Abstract
Aiming at trading off several conflicting criteria in practical maintenance in a deteriorating water distribution network, a life cycle oriented multi-objective optimization model of water distribution network maintenance is developed, which is composed of seven interrelated sub-models with different functions. This model can provide decision support for preventive maintenance decision, including identifying the pipeline that needs to be maintained, judging the time point for maintenance, determining the type of maintenance technology, calculating the economic cost of maintenance, and presenting the impact under different maintenance strategies. Based on the life cycle of each pipeline, multiple effects in the water distribution can be dynamically evaluated, such as pipeline age, failure rate, hydraulic reliability health level etc. Based on special design of chromosome gene encoding, the algorithm of elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) is incorporated to achieve multi-objective optimization solution effectively. With application of a county in Zhejiang province in China, three strategies including empirical decision single-objective optimization decision and multi-objective optimization decision are evaluated and compared to the baseline systematically. Although the annual maintenance cost of strategy III is not the lowest among those three strategies, the pipeline age, failure rate, hydraulic reliability, and health level of the water distribution network under the strategy are at the best level. With multiple objectives considered simultaneously, the results of strategy III are recommended as the optimal maintenance implementation arrangements. This model can promote to find an optimal maintenance strategy, and provide a technical support for the planning, design and implementation of maintenance arrangements of water distribution network in a long-term period.
Similar content being viewed by others
Code Availability
The authors announce that there is no problem for sharing the used model and codes by make request to corresponding author.
References
Alvisi S, Franchini M (2006) Near-optimal rehabilitation scheduling of water distribution systems based on a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Civ Eng Environ Syst 23(3):143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286600600789300
American Water Works Association (AWWA) (2014) Manual M28: Rehabilitation of water mains, 3rd edn. AWWA, Denver CO
Aşchilean I, Badea G, Giurca I, Naghiu GS, Iloaie FG (2017) Choosing the optimal technology to rehabilitate the pipes in water distribution systems using the AHP method. Energy Procedia 112:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1109
Buldyrev SV, Parshani R, Paul G, Stanley HE, Havlin S (2010) Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 464(7291):1025–1028
Chu JY, Wang C, Chen JN, Wang H (2009) Agent-based residential water use behavior simulation and policy implications: a case-study in Beijing City. Water Resour Manage 23(15):3267–3295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9433-2
Chu JY, Wang H, Shao Y, Yu TC (2022) Analysis on theory and technical framework of optimal maintenance of water distribution network. Water Resources Protection 38(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2022.01.009
Chu JY, Zhou ZH, Tian ZY, Liu JJ (2021) Analysis of system framework and progressive selection mode of water distribution network maintenance technology. Water & Wastewater Engineering 47(8):138–144. https://doi.org/10.13789/j.cnki.wwe1964.2021.08.024
Dandy GC, Engelhardt M (2001) The optimal scheduling of water pipe replacement using genetic algorithms. J Water Resour Plan Manag 127(4):214–223. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:4(214)
Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan, T (2000). A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: , et al. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI. PPSN 2000. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Lect Notes Comput Sci 1917. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45356-3_83
Ding XY, Liu SR, Liu JH, Chu JY, Guo XL (2019) Review on Health Assessment of Urban water distribution network, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 227: 042012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/227/4/042012
Ding XY, Liu SR, Shi XL, Chu JY, Guo XL (2020) Health evaluation of urban water supply pipe network using the Bayesian method based on triangular fuzzy number optimization. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 467:012124.https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/467/1/012124
Giustolisi O, Berardi L (2009) Prioritizing pipe replacement: from multiobjective genetic algorithms to operational decision support. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135(6):484–492. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:6(484)
Giustolisi O, Laucelli D, Savic DA (2006) Development of rehabilitation plans for water mains replacement considering risk and cost-benefit assessment. Civ Eng Environ Syst 23(3):175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286600600789375
Kleiner Y, Adams BJ, Rogers JS (1998) Selection and scheduling of rehabilitation alternatives for water distribution systems. Water Resour Res 34(8):2053–2061. https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR01281
Koutiva I, Makropoulos C (2016) Modelling domestic water demand: An agent based approach. Environ Model Softw 79:35–54
Lansey KE, Basnet C, Mays LW, Woodburn J (1992) Optimal maintenance scheduling for water distribution systems. Civ Eng Syst 9:211–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02630259208970650
Marzouk M, Hamid SA (2017) Budget allocation for water mains rehabilitation projects using Simos’ procedure. HBRC J 13:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.04.003
Muhammed K, Farmani R, Behzadian K, Diao KG, Butler D (2017).Optimal rehabilitation of water distribution systems using a cluster-based technique. J Water Res Plan Manag 143(7): 04017022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000770
Schneiter CR, Haimes YY, Li D, Lambert JH (1996) Capacity reliability of water distribution networks and optimum rehabilitation decision making. Water Resour Res 32(7):2271–2278. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR00357
Scholten L, Scheidegger A, Reichert P, Mauer M, Lienert J (2014) Strategic rehabilitation planning of piped water networks using multi-criteria decision analysis. Water Res 14:124–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.017
Shamir U, Howard CDD (May 1979) An analytic approach to scheduling pipe replacement. J Am Water Works Assoc 71(5):248–258. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41270297
Wagner JM, Shamir U, Marks DH (March 1988) Water distribution reliability: simulation methods. J Water Resour Plan Manag 114(3):276–294. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1988)114:3(276)
Walski TM, Pelliccia A (1982) Economic analysis of water main breaks. J Am Water Works Assoc 74 (3):140–147. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41271245
Zheng FF, Qi ZX, Bi WW, Zhang TQ, Yu TC, Shao Y (2017) Improved understanding on the searching behavior of NSGA-II Operators using run-time measure metrics with application to water distribution system design problems. Water Resour Manag 31:1121–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1564-7
Funding
This research is supported by the national key research and development program of China (2016YFC0400605; 2021YFC3000205), and technology and hydrology joint plan project of Jiangxi (2022KSG01007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Chu, Zhou; Methodology: Chu, Zhou, Ding; Formal analysis; Investigation: Chu, Ding; Writing: Chu, Tian; Supervision: Zhou, Ding.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chu, J., Zhou, Z., Ding, X. et al. A Life Cycle Oriented Multi‑objective Optimal Maintenance of Water Distribution: Model and Application. Water Resour Manage 36, 4161–4182 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03246-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03246-6