Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robule Lake, located in Eastern Serbia, near the city of Bor, is being influenced by waste materials from mining activities. For the purification of water from Robule Lake, contaminated with various metal ions (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Cd, Ni, etc.), acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment methods such as: passive treatment method, sequential neutralization, ion exchange, adsorption process based on low cost adsorbents, adsorption process based on natural zeolits, electrodialysis, filtration with nanofiltration membranes, and reverse osmosis, were evaluated by the following MCDM methods: TOPSIS, VIKOR, MOOSRA, WASPAS, and CoCoSo. Criteria used for the evaluation were: efficiency in the metal ions removal and the quality of the purified water, necessity of pre-treatment and / or post-treatment of treated water, possibility of using the generated waste, capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, needed area, and sensitivity of the method. The results of the MCDM analysis showed that sequential neutralization was the most appropriate method for this wastewater, while passive treatment system and ion exchange were ranked as second and third, respectively.

After the selection of AMD treatment method, neutralization tests with lime were carried out with the water sample from Robule Lake. The results of sequential neutralization testing showed that concentration of Fe ions could be lowered to 1 mg/L at pH 4. The values of Cu, Zn, and Ni ions concentration obtained at pH 7 were 0.04, 0.65, and 0.21 mg/L, respectively, while the values of Mn and Cd ions concentration of 0.01 and 0.0001 mg/L, were obtained at pH 10.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data will be available in article or upon request.

Notes

  1. Regulations 3/1968; 50/2012; 24/2014.

  2. Stevanović et al. 2013.

  3. Gardic et al. 2017.

  4. Petronijevic et al. 2020.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia for the financial support of scientific research at the University of Belgrade, Technical Faculty in Bor (contract number 451-03-9/2021-14/200131) and Mining and Metallurgy Institute Bor (contract number 451-03-9/2021-14/200052).

Funding

Research presented in this paper was funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia as it was mentioned in Acknowledgement section of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Zoran Štirbanović – conceptualization; methodology; writing – original draft preparation; data curation; editing of manuscript; project administrator. Vojka Gardić – methodology; writing – original draft preparation. Dragiša Stanujkić – methodology; writing – original draft preparation; software. Radmila Marković – data acquisition; investigation. Jovica Sokolović – visualization; validation; formal analysis. Zoran Stevanović – validation; supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoran Štirbanović.

Ethics declarations

Consent to Publish

Authors give their permission to publish.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Štirbanović, Z., Gardić, V., Stanujkić, D. et al. Comparative MCDM Analysis for AMD Treatment Method Selection. Water Resour Manage 35, 3737–3753 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02914-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02914-3

Keywords

Navigation