An accurate prediction of pipes failure rate plays a substantial role in the management of Water Distribution Networks (WDNs). In this study, a field study was conducted to register pipes break and relevant causes in the WDN of Yazd City, Iran. In this way, 851 water pipes were incepted and localized by the Global Positioning System (GPS) apparatus. Then, 1033 failure cases were reported in the eight zones of understudy WDN during March-December 2014. Pipes break rate (BRP) was calculated using the depth of pipe installation (hP), number of failures (NP), the pressure of water pipes in operation (P), and age of pipe (AP). After completing a pipe break database, robust Artificial Intelligence models, namely Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS), Gene-Expression Programming (GEP), and M5 Model Tree were employed to extract precise formulation for the pipes break rate estimation. Results of the proposed relationships demonstrated that the MARS model with Coefficient of Correlation (R) of 0.981 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.544 provided more satisfying efficiency than the M5 model (R = 0.888 and RMSE = 1.096). Furthermore, statistical results indicated that MARS and GEP models had comparatively at the same accuracy level. Explicit equations by Artificial Intelligence (AI) models were satisfactorily comparable with those obtained by literature review in terms of various conditions: physical, operational, and environmental factors and complexity of AI models. Through a probabilistic framework for the pipes break rate, the results of first-order reliability analysis indicated that the MARS technique had a highly satisfying performance when MARS-extracted-equation was assigned as a limit state function.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The data are not publicly available due to restrictions such their containing information that.
Aydogdu M, Firat M (2015) Estimation of Failure Rate in Water Distribution Network Using Fuzzy Clustering and LS-SVM Methods. Water Resour Manage 29:1575–1590
Berardi L, Kapelan Z, Giustolisi O, Savic DA (2008) Development of pipe deterioration models for water distribution systems using EPR. J Hydroinf 10(2):113–126
Berardi L, Giustolisi O (2021) Calibration of Design Models for Leakage Management of Water Distribution Networks. Water Resour Manage 35:2537–2551
Clair AMS, Sinha S (2012) State-of-the-technology review on water pipe condition, deterioration and failure rate prediction models! Urban Water Journal 9(2):85–112
Clark RM, Stafford CL, Goodrich JA (1982) Water distribution systems: A spatial and cost evaluation. J Water Resour Plng Mgmt Div 108(3):243–256
Friedman JH (1991) Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. Ann Stat 19(1):1–67
Ferreira C (2006) Gene Expression Programming: Mathematical Modeling by an Artificial Intelligence. Springer
Homaei F, Najafzadeh MA (2020) Reliability-based probabilistic evaluation of the wave-induced scour depth around marine structure piles. Ocean Eng 19:106818
Jowitt PW, Xu C (1993) Predicting Pipe Failure Effects in Water Distribution Networks. J Water Resour Plann Manage 119(1):18–31
Keshtkar B, Kisi O (2018) RM5Tree: Radial basis M5 model tree for accurate structural reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 180:49–61
Kettler AJ, Goulter IC (1985) An analysis of pipe breakage in urban water distribution networks. Can J Civ Eng 12:286–293
Moslehi I, Jalili-Ghazizadeh M (2020) Pressure-Pipe Breaks Relationship in Water Distribution Networks: A Statistical Analysis. Water Resour Manage 34:2851–2868
Quinlan JR (1992) Learning with Continuous Classes In Proceedings of AI’92 (Adams & Sterling, Eds), Singapore. World Sci 343–348
Rezaie-Balf M, Fani-Nowbandegani S, Samadi SZ, Fallah H, Alaghmand S (2019) An Ensemble Decomposition-Based Artificial Intelligence Approach for Daily Streamflow Prediction. Water 11:709
Robles-Velasco, Cortes P, Munuzuri J, Oniev L (2020) Prediction of pipe failures in water supply networks using logistic regression and support vector classification. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 196:106754
Rezaei H, Ryanb B, Stoianovc I (2015) Pipe failure analysis and impact of dynamic hydraulic conditions in water supply networks. 13th Com Control Water Industry Confer, CCWI 2015. Leicester, UK
Silinis PG, Franks SW (2007) Understanding failure rates in cast iron pipes using temporal stratification. Urban Water Journal 4(1):1–7
Shirzad A, Tabesh M, Atayikia B (2017) Multiobjective Optimization of Pressure Dependent Dynamic Design for Water Distribution Networks. Water Resour Manage 31:2561–2578
Savic DA, Giustolisi O, Berardi L, Shepherd W, Djordjevic S, Saul A (2006) Modelling sewers failure using evolutionary computing. Pro ICE Wat Manage 159(2):111–118
Seifollahi-Aghmiuni S, Bozorg Haddad O, Omid MH, Marino MA (2013) Effects of Pipe Roughness Uncertainty on Water Distribution Network Performance During its Operational Period. Water Resour Manage 27:1581–1599
Shi WZ, Zhang AS, Ho OK (2013) Spatial analysis of water mains failure clusters and factors: a Hong Kong case study. Ann GIS 19(2):89–97
Shende S, Chau W-W (2019) Design of water distribution systems using an intelligent simple benchmarking algorithm with respect to cost optimization and computational efficiency. Water Supply 19(7):1892–1898
Stephens M, Gong J, Zhang C, Marchi A, Dix L, Lambert MF (2020) Leak-Before-Break Main Failure Prevention for Water Distribution Pipes Using Acoustic Smart Water Technologies: Case Study in Adelaide. J Water Resour Plann Manage 146(10):05020020
Sattari MT, Falsafian K, Irvem A, Qasem SSSN (2020) Potential of kernel and tree-based machine-learning models for estimating missing data of rainfall. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 14(1):1078–1094
Shamshirband S, Hashemi S, Salimi H, Samadianfard S, Asadi E, Shadkani S, Kargar K, Mosavi A, Nabipour N, Chau K-W (2020) Predicting Standardized Streamflow Index for Hydrological Drought Using Machine Learning Models. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 14(1):339–350
Sarıdemir M (2010) Genetic programming approach for prediction of compressive strength of concretes containing rice husk ash. Constr Build Mater 24:1911–1919
Tang K, Parsons DJ, Jude S (2019) Comparison of automatic and guided learning for Bayesian networks to analyse pipe failures in the water distribution system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 186:24–36
Taormina R, Chau W-W (2015) ANN-based interval forecasting of streamflow discharges using the LUBE method and MOFIPS. Eng Appl Artif Intell 45:429–440
Wang Y, Zayed T, Moselhi O (2009) Prediction models for annual break rates of water mains. J Perform Constr Facil 23(1):47–54
Wols B, Moerman A, Horst P, Laarhoven KV (2018) Prediction of Pipe Failure in Drinking Water Distribution Networks by Comsima. Proceedings 2(11):589. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2110589
Xu Q, Chen Q, Li W (2011a) Application of genetic programming to modeling pipe failures in water distribution systems. J Hydroinf 13(3):419–428
Xu Q, Chen Q, Li W, Ma J (2011b) Pipe break prediction based on evolutionary data-driven methods with brief recorded data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(8):942–948
Xu Q, Chen Q, Ma J, Blanckaert K (2013) Optimal pipe replacement strategy based on break rate prediction through genetic programming for water distribution network. J Hydro-Environ Res 7(2):134–140
Yazdekhasti S, Vladeanu G, Daly C (2020) Evaluation of artificial intelligence tool performance for predicting water pipe failures. Pipelines Conference, August 9–12, San Antonio, Texas
Yilmaz B, Egemen Aras E, Nacar S, Kankal M (2018) Estimating suspended sediment load with multivariate adaptive regression spline, teaching-learning based optimization, and artificial bee colony models. Sci Total Environ 639:826–840
Zampieri P, Zanini MA, Faleschini F (2016) Influence of damage on the seismic failure analysis of masonry arches. Constr Build Mater 119:343–355
No funds, grants, or other supports were received.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964. Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to Publish
All the authors give the Publisher the permission of the authors to publish the research work.
There is no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Amiri-Ardakani, Y., Najafzadeh, M. Pipe Break Rate Assessment While Considering Physical and Operational Factors: A Methodology based on Global Positioning System and Data-Driven Techniques. Water Resour Manage 35, 3703–3720 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02911-6
- Break rate
- Reliability evaluation
- Water distribution network
- Field Investigation
- Artificial intelligence approaches
- Available predictive techniques