Abstract
A decision-making method for water resource regulation that considers the multi-objective time-varying competition relationship is proposed, given the dynamic time-varying characteristics of the mutual feedback relationship and its strength as the main targets in the water resources scheduling cycle. With a focus on different dispatching periods, a time-varying multi-objective model of annual generation, annual ecology, period ecology is constructed. Dynamic decision weights are built using a method that combines entropy weight and FAHP, and then selects the dynamic preference scheme from the frontier cluster by weighted TOPSIS based on the weights. In this study the lower reaches of the Jinsha River are used as an example. The spatiotemporal variation relationship of the multi-objective is analyzed, the entire year is divided into three operation periods, and the Pareto frontier cluster is solved with a time-varying process. The results show that power generation is competitive with ecology on an annual scale. However, the relationship varies slightly in each period, being weakly cooperative in the flood period, not significant in the storage period, and competitive in the routine period. The decision method of focusing on the key period, considering time-varying demands and dynamic preferences, can obtain better annual power generation and ecological protection benefits than the traditional unified annual regulation method, and can improve the degree of guarantee of ecological demand in key areas during critical periods. Focusing on ecological protection during the routine period can achieve the best balance between power generation and ecological protection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Readers can contact authors for availability of data and materials.
References
Afshar MH, Hajiabadi R (2018) A novel parallel cellular automata algorithm for multi-objective reservoir operation optimization. Water Resour Manage 32:785–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1839-7
Bai T, Wei J, Chang FJ et al (2019) Optimize multi-objective transformation rules of water-sediment regulation for cascade reservoirs in the Upper Yellow River of China. J Hydrol 577:123987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123987
Behzadian M, Khanmohammadi Otaghsara S, Yazdani M, Ignatius J (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst App 39:13051–13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
Chen H, Wang W, Chen X, Qiu L (2020) Multi-objective reservoir operation using particle swarm optimization with adaptive random inertia weights. Water Sci Eng 13:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2020.06.005
Cruz Courtois OA, de la, Arganis Juárez ML, Guichard Romero D, (2021) Simulated Optimal Operation Policies of a Reservoir System Obtained with Continuous Functions Using Synthetic Inflows. Water Resour Manage 35:2249–2263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02841-3
Feng Z, Niu W, Cheng C (2018) Optimization of hydropower reservoirs operation balancing generation benefit and ecological requirement with parallel multi-objective genetic algorithm. Energy 153:706–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.075
Guo, Y., Xu, Y.-P., Yu, X., Chen, H., Gu, H., and Xie, J (2020) AI-based techniques for multi-step streamflow forecasts: Application for multi-objective reservoir operation optimization and performance assessment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-617, in review
Hojjati A, Monadi M, Faridhosseini A, Mohammadi M (2018) Application and comparison of NSGA-II and MOPSO in multi-objective optimization of water resources systems. J Hydrol Hydromechan 66:323–329. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2018-0006
Jiang Z, Liu P, Ji C et al (2019) Ecological flow considered multi-objective storage energy operation chart optimization of large-scale mixed reservoirs. J Hydrol 577:123949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123949
Malekmohammadi B, Zahraie B, Kerachian R (2011) Ranking solutions of multi-objective reservoir operation optimization models using multi-criteria decision analysis. Expert Syst Appl 38:7851–7863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.119
Moosavian N, Lence BJ (2017) Nondominated sorting differential evolution algorithms for multiobjective optimization of water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 143:04016082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000741
Ni X, Dong Z, Xie W et al (2019) Research on the Multi-Objective Cooperative Competition Mechanism of Jinsha River Downstream Cascade Reservoirs during the Flood Season Based on Optimized NSGA-III. Water 11:849. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040849
Qiu H, Chen L, Zhou J et al (2021) Risk analysis of water supply-hydropower generation-environment nexus in the cascade reservoir operation. J Clean Product 283:124239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124239
Reed PM, Hadka D, Herman JD et al (2013) Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: The past, present, and future. Adv Water Resourc 51:438–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.005
Ren J, Peng Q, Lin J et al (2014) The fish reproduction ecological requirements of the National Nature Reserve for the rare and endemic fishes in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Freshwater Fisheries 44:18–23. https://doi.org/10.13721/j.cnki.dsyy.2014.06.002 (in Chinese)
Ren L, Song C, Wu W et al (2020) Reservoir effects on the variations of the water temperature in the upper Yellow River, China, using principal component analysis. J Environ Manag 262:110339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110339
Ren S, Zhang B, Wang WJ et al (2021) Sedimentation and its response to management strategies of the Three Gorges Reservoir, Yangtze River. China CATENA 199:105096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.105096
Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP (1996) A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems. Conserv Biol 10:1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041163.x
Si Y, Li X, Yin D et al (2019) Revealing the water-energy-food nexus in the Upper Yellow River Basin through multi-objective optimization for reservoir system. Scie Total Environ 682:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.427
Song H, Deng Y (2013) Related control indexes in Comprehensive Planning of Yangtze River Basin and their applications. Yangtze River 44:37–39. https://doi.org/10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2013.10.020 (in Chinese)
Suwal N, Huang X, Kuriqi A et al (2020) Optimisation of cascade reservoir operation considering environmental flows for different environmental management classes. Renew Energy 158:453–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.161
Wang H, Wang X, Lei X et al (2019) The development and prospect of key techniques in the cascade reservoir operation. J Hydraulic Eng (Shuili Xuebao) 50:25–37. https://doi.org/10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.20180795 (in Chinese)
Wang X, Dong Z, Ai X et al (2020) Multi-objective model and decision-making method for coordinating the ecological benefits of the Three Gorger Reservoir. J Clean Prod 270:122066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122066
Yang T, Liu X, Wang L et al (2020a) Simulating hydropower discharge using multiple decision tree methods and a dynamical model merging technique. J Water Resour Plan Manag 146:04019072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001146
Yang Z, Yang K, Hu H, Su L (2019a) The cascade reservoirs multi-objective ecological operation optimization considering different ecological flow demand. Water Resour Manage 33:207–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2097-z
Yang Z, Yang K, Wang Y et al (2019b) The improved multi-criteria decision-making model for multi-objective operation in a complex reservoir system. J Hydroinformatics 21:851–874. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2019.150
Yang Z, Yang K, Wang Y et al (2020b) Multi-objective short-term hydropower generation operation for cascade reservoirs and stochastic decision making under multiple uncertainties. J Clean Product 276:122995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122995
Zeng X, Hu T, Cai X et al (2019) Improved dynamic programming for parallel reservoir system operation optimization. Adva Water Resourc 131:103373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.07.003
Zhang Z, Qin H, Yao L et al (2020) Improved multi-objective moth-flame optimization algorithm based on r-domination for cascade reservoirs operation. J Hydrol 581:124431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124431
Zhao W, Cao H, Huang Z, Wang Z (2015) Assessment of physical integrity of national nature reserve for rare and endemic fishes in upstream yangtze river before and after xiangjiaba dam impoundment. J Yangtze River Scientif Res Ins 32:76–80. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2015.06.014. (in Chinese)
Funding
This research was funded by the National Key Research & Development Project of China, grant number 2016YFC0402209.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors state that they participated in the design of the article prepared in the following way: Z.D.: Conceptualization, Data, Project Administration. X.N.: Writing—Original Draft, Simulation, Validation. M.C.: Methodology. H.Y.: Investigation, Simulation Code. W.J.: Writing—Review & Editing. J.Z.: Visualization. L.R.: Formal Analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
The authors express their ethical approval of the contents of the submitted work.
Consent to Participate
The authors express their consent to have participated in the submitted work.
Consent to Publish
The authors state that the data used is in the public domain and may be published.
Competing Interests
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dong, Z., Ni, X., Chen, M. et al. Time-varying Decision-making Method for Multi-objective Regulation of Water Resources. Water Resour Manage 35, 3411–3430 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02901-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02901-8