Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement of Two-Dimensional Flow-Depth Prediction Based on Neural Network Models By Preprocessing Hydrological and Geomorphological Data

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stability and efficiency of a rainfall–runoff model are of concern for establishing a flood early warning system. To tackle any problems associated with the numerical instability or computational cost of conducting a real-time runoff prediction, the neural network (NN) method has emerged as an alternative to calculate the overland-flow depths in a watershed. Therefore, instead of developing a new algorithm of machine learning to improve the predicted accuracy, this study focuses on thoroughly exploring the influence of input data that are highly related to the flow responses in space, and then establishing a procedure to process all the input data for the NN training. The novelty of this study is as follows: (1) To improve the overall accuracy of the 2D flood prediction, geomorphological factors, such as the hydrologic length (L), the flow accumulation value (FAV), and the bed slope (S) at the location of each element extracted from the topographic dataset were considered together and were classified into multiple zones for separate trainings. (2) An optimal length of the effective rainfall condition (To) was proposed by conducting a correlation analysis to determine the most informative precipitation data. In this study, the outcomes of four types of NN models were examined and compared with one another. The results show that the simplest structure of the NN methods could achieve satisfactory predictions of flow depth, as long as the approaches of data preprocessing and model training proposed in this study were implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Anderberg MR (1973) Cluster Analysis for Application. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H (1928) On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics. IBM J Res Dev 11(2):215–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang H-T, Jhong B-C, Tan Y-C, Ke K-Y, Chuang M-H (2019) A two-stage approach integrating SOM- and MOGA-SVM-based algorithms to forecast spatial-temporal groundwater level with meteorological factors. Water Resour Manage 33:797–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haykin S (2009) Neural networks and learning machines, 3rd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu K, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S (1995) Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resour Res 31(10):2517–2530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang P-C, Lee KT (2016) Distinctions of geomorphologic properties caused by different flow-direction predictions from digital elevation models. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 30(2):168–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang P-C, Lee KT (2017) Efficient DEM-based overland flow routing using integrated recursive algorithms. Hydrol Process 31:1007–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter NM, Bates PD, Neelz S, Pender G, Villanueva I, Wright NG, Liang D, Falconer RA, Lin B, Waller S, Crossley AJ, Mason D (2008) Benchmarking 2D hydraulic models for urban flood simulations. Proc Inst Civ Eng Water Manag 161(1):13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jhong B-C, Wang J-H, Lin G-F (2017) An integrated two-stage support vector machine approach to forecast inundation maps during typhoons. J Hydrol 547:236–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirpich ZP (1940) Time of concentration of small agricultural watersheds. Civ Eng 10(6):362

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar DN, Raju KS, Sathish T (2004) River flow forecasting using recurrent neural networks. Water Resour Manag 18(2):143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KT, Chen NC, Gartsman B (2009) Impact of stream network structure on the transition break of peak flows. J Hydrol 367(3):283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liong S-Y, Lim W-H, Paudyal GN (2000) River stage forecasting in Bangladesh: neural network approach. J Comput Civ Eng 14(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCormack RW (1982) A numerical method for solving the equations of compressible viscous flow. AIAA J 20(9):1275–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK, Desai VR (2006) Drought forecasting using feedforward recursive neural network. Ecol Model 198(1–2):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modaresi F, Araghinejad S, Ebrahimi K (2018) A comparative assessment of artificial neural network, generalized regression neural network, least-square support vector regression, and K-nearest neighbor regression for monthly streamflow forecasting in linear and nonlinear conditions. Water Resour Manag 32:243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razavi S, Karamouz M (2007) Adaptive neural networks for flood routing in river systems. Water Int 32(3):360–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roshni T, Jha MK, Deo RC, Vandana A (2019) Development and evaluation of hybrid artificial neural network architectures for modeling spatio-temporal groundwater fluctuations in a complex aquifer system. Water Resour Manag 33:2381–2397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavazoie S, Hughes JD, Campbell MJ, Cho RJ, Church GM (1999) Systematic determination of genetic network architecture. Nat Genet 22:281–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Hjelmfelt AT (1998) DEM based overland flow routing modeling. J Hydrol Eng 3(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani MR, Saghafian B, Mahdian MH, Soltani S (2009) Monthly runoff estimation using artificial neural networks. J Agric Sci Technol 11(3):355–362

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan under grant MOST 109-2625-M-019-003-MY2 is sincerely acknowledged.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan under grant MOST 109–2625-M-019–003-MY2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Pin-Chun Huang; Methodology: Pin-Chun Huang; Formal analysis and investigation: Pin-Chun Huang; Writing—original draft preparation: Pin-Chun Huang; Writing—review and editing: Pin-Chun Huang; Funding acquisition: Kwan Tun Lee; Resources: Kwan Tun Lee; Supervision: Kwan Tun Lee, Kuo-Lin Hsu.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pin-Chun Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Informed consent.

Consent to Participate

The authors declare that they participate in this research.

Consent for Publication

The authors declare that they consent to publish this research article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, PC., Hsu, KL. & Lee, K.T. Improvement of Two-Dimensional Flow-Depth Prediction Based on Neural Network Models By Preprocessing Hydrological and Geomorphological Data. Water Resour Manage 35, 1079–1100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02776-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02776-9

Keywords

Navigation