Skip to main content
Log in

A Spatial Non-Stationary Based Site Selection of Artificial Groundwater Recharge: a Case Study for Semi-Arid Regions

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a methodology was developed for AGR assessment, including site selection, non-stationary kriging, numerical modeling, and the long-term supply and demand sustainability. To achieve this, spatial variations maps of effective parameters were prepared using kriging techniques along with the Fuzzy logic method and GIS analytical functions for AGR site selection. To estimate how AGR is changing the water balance in the region, the Soil Water Assessment Tools (SWAT) hydrological model was coupled with an in house 2-D finite difference groundwater model. Based on the SWAT model results, by applying AGR, infiltration increased dramatically from 101 to 146 mm. In order to improve the model’s accuracy, transmissivity was regionalized through non-stationary kriging by splitting the region into sub-regions where the characteristics of each variogram are different. By using non-stationary kriging, the statistic R2 from single variogram to multiple variograms increased from 0.27 to 0.95, and the groundwater level was improved by 15%. Furthermore, for evaluating the sustainability of water resources, an index called Planning for Sustainable Index (PSUI) was utilized to measure AGR effects. PSUI, after applying AGR without changing in water withdrawal, was increased from 0.11 to 0.17 during 27-years time horizon. The case study is the aquifer in Qorveh Dehgolan sub-basin in Kordestan province, Iran. The results indicate that by applying AGR to the region, the rate of groundwater level reduction would decrease significantly for about 30%. However, for preventing the groundwater depletion, AGR should be accompanied by 50% reduction in withdrawals/pumping. The results show the significant value of utilizing a platform to assess the attributes and benefits of AGR. The proposed algorithm can be used for other geographical settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

References

  • Abbaspour KC, Johnson CA, Van Genuchten MT (2004) Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadose Zone J 3(4):1340–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahirwar S, Malik MS, Ahirwar R, Shukla JP (2020) Identification of suitable sites and structures for artificial groundwater recharge for sustainable groundwater resource development and management. Groundw Sustain Dev 100388

  • Akter A, Uddin AMH, Wahid KB, Ahmed S (2020) Predicting groundwater recharge potential zones using geospatial technique. Sustain Water Resour Manag 6(2):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Allen PM, Bernhardt G (1993) A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. J Hydrol 142(1–4):47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW, Abbaspour KC, White MJ, Srinivasan R et al (2012) SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE 55(4):1491–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson PM, Lloyd CD (2007) Non-stationary variogram models for geostatistical sampling optimisation: an empirical investigation using elevation data. Comput Geosci 33(10):1285–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekar H, Lokesh KV, Sameena M, Ranganna G (2015) GIS–based morphometric analysis of two reservoir catchments of Arkavati River, Ramanagaram District, Karnataka. Aquatic Procedia 4:1345–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung IM, Kim NW, Lee J, Sophocleous M (2010) Assessing distributed groundwater recharge rate using integrated surface water-groundwater modelling: application to Mihocheon watershed, South Korea. Hydrogeol J 18(5):1253–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N., (1993), Statistics for spatial data, Wiley Interscience

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Das B, Pal SC (2019) Combination of GIS and fuzzy-AHP for delineating groundwater recharge potential zones in the critical Goghat-II block of West Bengal, India. HydroResearch 2:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Winnaar G, Jewitt GPW, Horan M (2007) A GIS-based approach for identifying potential runoff harvesting sites in the Thukela River basin, South Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 32(15–18):1058–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon P, Stuyfzand P, Grischek T, Lluria M, Pyne RDG, Jain RC, Bear J, Schwarz J, Wang W, Fernandez E, Stefan C, Pettenati M, van der Gun J, Sprenger C, Massmann G, Scanlon BR, Xanke J, Jokela P, Zheng Y, Rossetto R, Shamrukh M, Pavelic P, Murray E, Ross A, Bonilla Valverde JP, Palma Nava A, Ansems N, Posavec K, Ha K, Martin R, Sapiano M (2019) Sixty years of global progress in managed aquifer recharge. Hydrogeol J 27(1):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gascó G, Hermosilla D, Gascó A, Naredo JM (2005) Application of a physical input–output table to evaluate the development and sustainability of continental water resources in Spain. Environ Manag 36(1):59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavahi, M., Nafooti, M. H., & Jamali, A. (2018) Combination of fuzzy and Boolean logic and MCDM methods for investigating suitable areas for artificial groundwater recharge (case study: Chenaran watershed in Razavi Khorasan Province). Journal of desert ecosystem engineering journal. DEEj (2018) 7(1)-1-10

  • Ghazavi R, Babaei S, Erfanian M (2018) Recharge Wells site selection for artificial groundwater recharge in an urban area using fuzzy logic technique. Water Resour Manag 32(12):3821–3834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogate NG, Rawal PM (2015) Identification of potential stormwater recharge zones in dense urban context: a case study from Pune city. International Journal of Environmental Research 9(4):1259–1268

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammouri N, Al-Amoush H, Al-Raggad M, Harahsheh H (2013) Groundwater recharge zones mapping using GIS: a case study in southern part of Jordan valley. Jordan Arabian Journal of Geosciences: Saudi Society for Geosciencesi 7(7):2815–2829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iran Geological Survey (2016) Report. No 5560. (available at: gis.ir/fa/map/77 (In Farsi)

  • Iran water balance report (2016), Report of "Updating water balance data for Sefid-Rood Basin" (available at http://wrs.wrm.ir/amar) (In Farsi)

  • Jenifer MA, Jha MK (2017) Comparison of analytic hierarchy process, catastrophe and entropy techniques for evaluating groundwater prospect of hard-rock aquifer systems. J Hydrol 548:605–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Fereshtehpour M (2019) Modeling DEM errors in coastal flood inundation and damages: a spatial non-stationary approach. Water Resour Res 55(8):6606–6624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Teymori J, Rahimi R, Olyaei MA, Mohammadpour P (2018, May) The impact of artificial groundwater recharge on water resources sustainability. In: World environmental and water resources congress 2018. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 92–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz, M., Ahmadi, A., & Akhbari, M. (2020). 2nd Ed., groundwater hydrology: engineering, planning, and management. CRC press. Boca Raton, FL, p780

  • Kheirkhah Zarkesh M (2005) DSS for floodwater site selection in Iran. Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands, Doctoral dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolanuvada SR, Ponpandian KL, Sankar S (2019) Multi-criteria-based approach for optimal siting of artificial recharge structures through hydrological modeling. Arab J Geosci 12(6):190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Heap A (2008) A review of spatial interpolation methods for environmental scientists. Geoscience Australia: Record 2008/23, 137

  • Loucks DP (1997) Quantifying trends in system sustainability. Hydrol Sci J 42(4):513–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massuel S, Perrin J, Mascre C, Mohamed W, Boisson A, Ahmed S (2014) Managed aquifer recharge in South India: what to expect from small percolation tanks in hard rock? J Hydrol 512:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R., & Williams, J. R. (2005). Soil and water assessment tool input/output file documentation, version 2005, USDA. ARS grassland. Soil and water research laboratory, Temple, TX. Available at: www. Brc. Tamus. Edu/swat/doc. Html ()

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1990) Environmental indicators: basic concepts and terminology. Background paper No. 1. OECD, Paris

  • Pikounis M, Varanou E, Baltas E, Dassaklis A, Mimikou M (2003) Application of the SWAT model in the Pinios river basin under different land-use scenarios. Global Nest: the Int J 5(2):71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajasekhar M, Raju GS, Sreenivasulu Y, Raju RS (2019) Delineation of groundwater potential zones in semi-arid region of Jilledubanderu river basin, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India using fuzzy logic, AHP and integrated fuzzy-AHP approaches. HydroResearch 2:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan D, Durga Rao KHV, Tiwari KC (2008) Delineation of potential sites for water harvesting structures through remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study of Kali watershed, Gujarat, India. Geocarto International 23(2):95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. P. (1998). GS+ geostatistics for environmental science user manual. Gamma Design Software. Version, 3

  • Safavi HR, Golmohammadi MH, Sandoval-Solis S (2016) Scenario analysis for integrated water resources planning and management under uncertainty in the Zayandehrud river basin. J Hydrol 539:625–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval JA, Tiburan CL Jr (2019) Identification of potential artificial groundwater recharge sites in mount Makiling Forest reserve, Philippines using GIS and analytical hierarchy process. Appl Geogr 105:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval-Solis S, McKinney DC (2011) Water planning and management for large scale river basins: case of study of the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo transboundary basin. In: Doctoral dissertation, Center for Research in water resources. University of, Texas at Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuol J, Abbaspour KC, Srinivasan R, Yang H (2008) Estimation of freshwater availability in the west African sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model. J Hydrol 352(1–2):30–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Cornish PS (2005) Estimating shallow groundwater recharge in the headwaters of the Liverpool Plains using SWAT. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal 19(3):795–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebi A, Zahedi E, Hassan MA, Lesani MT (2019) Locating suitable sites for the construction of underground dams using the subsurface flow simulation (SWAT model) and analytical network process (ANP). Sustain Water Resour Manag 5(3):1369–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Lin HS (2010) Comparing ordinary kriging and regression kriging for soil properties in contrasting landscapes. Pedosphere 20(5):594–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of this paper about AGR site selection (the first step) is presented at the ASCE World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2018. Special thanks to Ms. Z. Heydari and Mr. A. Zoghi for their text editing and for making the paper more readable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.Karamouz: Development of original concept, scope of the work and modeling setup; SI framework, spatial nonstationarity application; writing, review and editing. J.Teymoori: data and GIS maps preparation, code writing and model calibration; data acquisition and preparation, variogram/kriging analysis, writing- Initial draft preparation, Software application. M.A.Olyaei: Conceptualization, program debugging, and validation; site selection and kriging analysis, Text editing; subsequent draft preparations.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Karamouz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 871 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karamouz, M., Teymoori, J. & Olyaei, M.A. A Spatial Non-Stationary Based Site Selection of Artificial Groundwater Recharge: a Case Study for Semi-Arid Regions. Water Resour Manage 35, 963–978 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02762-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02762-7

Keywords

Navigation