Abstract
This study develops a synergistic optimization framework for planning inter-regional water resources management system under shared socioeconomic pathways; this framework integrates multi-level and robust flexible programs. The upper-level model determines minimum social loss induced by water exploitation, the middle-level one focuses exclusively on pollutant emissions, and the lower-level one aims to achieve maximum economic benefits. An improved multi-level interactive algorithm is proposed to balance the satisfaction degree of constraints and goals to achieve optimal. The effectiveness of the developed multi-level model is illustrated through a real-world case in Wuhan City Circle. Results indicate that the overall water resources performance in Wuhan City Circle is satisfactory, especially in Xianning and Huanggang, whereas some water footprint deficits exist in Wuhan, Xiaogan, and Tianmen. Climate scenarios have a remarkable effect on social loss but only slightly affect water supply strategies, pollutant emissions, and economic benefits. A high satisfactory degree results in a low risk of insufficient water supply and excessive pollutant emissions. Thus, satisfactory degree can be used as an evaluation indicator for identifying the amount of credible and reliable risk on final decisions. The findings of this study can enable stakeholders to grasp the inherent conflicts and trade-offs between environmental and economic interests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alamanos A, Latinopoulos D, Loukas A, Mylopoulos N (2020) Comparing two hydro-economic approaches for multi-objective agricultural water resources planning. Water Resour Manag 34:4511–4526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02690-6
Al-Jawad JY, Alsaffar HM, Bertram D, Kalin RM (2019) A comprehensive optimum integrated water resources management approach for multidisciplinary water resources management problems. J Environ Manag 239:211–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.045
Calvin K, Bond-Lamberty B, Clarke L, Edmonds J, Eom J, Hartin C, Kim S, Kyle P, Link R, Moss R, McJeon H, Patel P, Smith S, Waldhoff S, Wise M (2017) The SSP4: a world of deepening inequality. Glob Environ Chang 42:284–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.010
Carayannis EG, Grigoroudis E, Goletsis Y (2016) A multilevel and multistage efficiency evaluation of innovation systems: a multiobjective DEA approach. Expert Syst Appl 62:63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.017
Chen Y, Lu H, Li J, Ren L, He L (2017a) A leader-follower-interactive method for regional water resources management with considering multiple water demands and eco-environmental constraints. J Hydrol 548:121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.015
Chen Y, He L, Guan Y, Lu H, Li J (2017b) Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and water-energy optimization for shale gas supply chain planning based on multi-level approach: Case study in Barnett, Marcellus, Fayetteville, and Haynesville shales. Energ Convers Manage 134:382–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.019
Chen Y, He L, Lu H, Li J, Ren L (2018) Planning for regional water system sustainability through water resources security assessment under uncertainties. Water Resour Manag 32:3135–3153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1981-x
Ek K, Persson L (2020) Priorities and preferences in water quality management - a case study of the Alsterån River basin. Water Resour Manag 34:155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02430-5
Fricko O, Havlik P, Rogelj J, Klimont Z, Gusti M, Johnson N, Kolp P, Strubegger M, Valin H, Amann M, Ermolieva T, Forsell N, Herrero M, Heyes C, Kindermann G, Krey V, McCollum DL, Obersteiner M, Pachauri S, Rao S, Schmid E, Schoepp W, Riahi K (2017) The marker quantification of the shared socioeconomic pathway 2: a middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. Glob Environ Chang 42:251–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004
Fujimori S, Hasegawa T, Masui T, Takahashi K, Herran DS, Dai H, Hijioka Y, Kainuma M (2017) SSP3: AIM implementation of shared socioeconomic pathways. Glob Environ Chang 42:268–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009
Galli A, Weinzettel J, Cranston G, Ercin E (2013) A footprint family extended MRIO model to support Europe's transition to a one planet economy. Sci Total Environ 461:813–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.071
Jin SW, Li YP, Huang GH, Nie S (2018) Analyzing the performance of clean development mechanism for electric power systems under uncertain environment. Renew Energ 123:382–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.066
Karimlou K, Hassani N, Mehrabadi AR, Nazari MR (2020) Correction to: developing a model for decision-makers in dynamic modeling of urban water system management. Water Resour Manag 34:2621–2623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02478-3
Kriegler E, Bauer N, Popp A, Humpenöder F, Leimbach M, Strefler J, Baumstark L, Bodirsky BL, Hilaire J, Klein D, Mouratiadou I, Weindl I, Bertram C, Dietrich JP, Luderer G, Pehl M, Pietzcker R, Piontek F, Lotze-Campen H, Biewald A, Bonsch M, Giannousakis A, Kreidenweis U, Müller C, Rolinski S, Schultes A, Schwanitz J, Stevanovic M, Calvin K, Emmerling J, Fujimori S, Edenhofer O (2017) Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): an energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. Glob Environ Chang 42:297–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015
Kumar P, Liu W, Chu X, Zhang Y, Li Z (2019) Integrated water resources management for an inland river basin in China. Watershed Ecology and the Environment 1:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsee.2019.10.002
Kundzewicz ZW, Krysanova V, Benestad RE, Hov Ø, Piniewski M, Otto IM (2018) Uncertainty in climate change impacts on water resources. Environ Sci Policy 79:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.008
Li C, Cai Y, Qian J (2018) A multi-stage fuzzy stochastic programming method for water resources management with the consideration of ecological water demand. Ecol Indic 95:930–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.029
Li JX, Su SL (2003) Calculation model of water pollution induced economic loss for river basin (in Chinses). J Hydraul Eng 10:68–74. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2003.10.011
Li XM, Lu HW, Li J, Du P, Xu M, He L (2015) A modified fuzzy credibility constrained programming approach for agricultural water resources management—a case study in Urumqi, China. Agr Water Manage 156:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.005
Lin P, You J, Gan H, Jia L (2020) Rule-based object-oriented water resource system simulation model for water allocation. Water Resour Manag 34:3183–3197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02607-3
Matrosov E, Huskova I, Kasprzyk JR, Harou JJ, Lambert C, Reed PM (2015) Many-objective optimization and visual analytics reveal key trade-offs for London’s water supply. J Hydrol 531:1040–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.003
McDonough KR, Hutchinson SL, Hutchinson JMS, Case JL, Rahmani V (2018) Validation and assessment of SPoRT-LIS surface soil moisture estimates for water resources management applications. J Hydrol 566:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.007
Mouratiadou I, Biewald A, Pehl M, Bonsch M, Baumstark L, Klein D, Popp A, Luderer G, Kriegler E (2016) The impact of climate change mitigation on water demand for energy and food: An integrated analysis based on the shared socioeconomic pathways. Environ Sci Pol 64:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.007
Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F, Mocholí-Arce M, Sala-Garrido R (2014) A management and optimisation model for water supply planning in water deficit areas. J Hydrol 515:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.054
Mianabadi A, Derakhshan H, Davary K, Hasheminia SM, Hrachowitz M (2020) Correction to: a novel idea for groundwater resource management during megadrought events. Water Resour Manag 34:4305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02686-2
Nematian J, Movahhed SR (2019) An extended multi-objective mixed integer programming for water resources management through possibility theory. Ecol Inform 54:100992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.100992
Peidro D, Mula J, Poler R, Verdegay JL (2009) Fuzzy optimization for supply chain planning under supply, demand and process uncertainties. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160(18):2640–2657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2009.02.021
Pishvaee MS, Khalaf MF (2016) Novel robust fuzzy mathematical programming methods. Appl Math Model 40(1):407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.04.054
Roach T, Kapelan Z, Ledbetter R (2018) Resilience-based performance metrics for water resources management under uncertainty. Adv Water Resour 116:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.03.016
Rong Q, Cai Y, Su M, Yue W, Yang Z, Dang Z (2019) A simulation-based bi-level multi-objective programming model for watershed water quality management under interval and stochastic uncertainties. J Environ Manag 245:418–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.125
Ryu J (2005) A multi-level programming optimization approach to enterprise-wide supply chain planning. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering 20:571–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-7946(05)80217-2
Tan QL, Liu Y, Zhang XP (2020) Stochastic optimization framework of the energy-water-emissions nexus for regional power system planning considering multiple uncertainty. J Clean Prod 124470:124470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124470
Uprety M, Ochoa-Tocachi BF, Paul JD, Regmi S, Buytaert W (2019) Improving water resources management using participatory monitoring in a remote mountainous region of Nepal. J Hydrol-Reg Stud 23:100604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100604
Van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, Gernaat DEHJ et al (2017) Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. Glob Environ Chang 42:237–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008
Wang C, Hou Y, Xue Y (2017) Water resources carrying capacity of wetlands in Beijing: analysis of policy optimization for urban wetland water resources management. J Clean Prod 161:1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.204
Wang C, Wang R, Hertwich E, Liu Y, Tong F (2019) Water scarcity risks mitigated or aggravated by the inter-regional electricity transmission across China. Appl Energ 238:413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.120
Xu X, Meng Z, Shen R (2013) A tri-level programming model based on conditional value-at-risk for three-stage supply chain management. Comput Ind Eng 66(2):470–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.07.012
Xu X, Zhang Y, Chen Y (2020) Projecting China's future water footprint under the shared socio-economic pathways. J Environ Manag 260:110102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110102
Yager RR (1981) A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval. Inform Sciences 24(2):143–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/00200255(81)90017-7
Yang P, Yao YF, Mi Z, Cao YF, Liao H, Yu BY, Liang QM, Coffman D'M, Wei YM (2018) Social cost of carbon under shared socioeconomic pathways. Glob Environ Chang 53:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.001
Yu L, Li YP, Huang GH, An CJ (2017a) A robust flexible-probabilistic programming method for planning municipal energy system with considering peak-electricity price and electric vehicle. Energ Convers Manage 137:97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.028
Yu L, Li YP, Huang GH, Shan BG (2017b) An interval-possibilistic basic-flexible programming method for air quality management of municipal energy system through introducing electric vehicles. Sci Total Environ 593-594:418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.175
Zhao F, Wu Y, Yao Y, Sun K, Zhang X, Winowiecki L, Vågen TG, Xu J, Qiu L, Sun P, Sun Y (2020) Predicting the climate change impacts on water-carbon coupling cycles for a loess hilly-gully watershed. J Hydrol 581:124388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124388
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41890824), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2020202117), Science and Technology Project of Hebei Education Department (BJ2020019), Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) (2019QZKK1003), Science Foundation of Hebei Normal University (L2019B36), Scientific and Technological Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Hebei Province (QN2019054), Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei collaborative innovation project of Tianjin Science and technology plan (19YFHBQY00050), Fundamental Research Funds of Hebei University of Technology and Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. WL2018003).
Availability of Data and Materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41890824), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2020202117), Science and Technology Project of Hebei Education Department (BJ2020019), Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) (2019QZKK1003), Science Foundation of Hebei Normal University (L2019B36), Scientific and Technological Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Hebei Province (QN2019054), Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei collaborative innovation project of Tianjin Science and technology plan (19YFHBQY00050), Fundamental Research Funds of Hebei University of Technology and Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. WL2018003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yizhong Chen: Methodology, Data curation, Writing – original draft; Hongwei Lu: Project administration, Project administration; Jing Li: Conceptualization, Supervision; Pengdong Yan: Data curation, Investigation; He Peng: Data curation, Writing – review & editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent to Publish
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Conflict of Interest
None
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOC 891 kb)
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Sets
- j :
-
the type of water sources (j = 1for surface water; 2 represents groundwater);
- i :
-
administrative region (i = 1 for Wuhan, 2 for Huangshi, 3 for Ezhou, 4 for Huanggang, 5 for Xiaogan, 6 for Xianning, 7 for Xiantao, 8 for Qianjiang, 9 for Tianmen);
- k :
-
represents the index for planning horizon (k = 1 for 2020, 2 for 2025);
- m :
-
the index for capacity expansion;
- g:
-
the type of pollutant; g = 1 for COD and 2 for ammonia nitrogen;
1.2 Parameters and decision variables
- BZ :
-
a ratio of production water consumption to total water consumption;
- CM :
-
the wastewater emission coefficient of the primary industries;
- CN :
-
the wastewater emission coefficient of the secondary industries;
- CO :
-
the wastewater emission coefficient of the tertiary industries;
- CP :
-
the wastewater emission coefficient of the domestic;
- EB :
-
the system economic benefit (RMB ¥);
- EM :
-
the benefit coefficient of water use in terms of the primary industries (RMB ¥/m3);
- EN :
-
the benefit coefficient of water use in terms of the secondary industries (RMB ¥/ m3);
- EO :
-
the benefit coefficient of water use in terms of the tertiary industries (RMB ¥/ m3);
- EP :
-
the benefit coefficient of water use in terms of the domestic (RMB ¥/ m3);
- f :
-
the agent equation of water footprint and water consumption at different sectors;
- FQ :
-
the minimum amount of grain yield (ton);
- GDWL :
-
the minimum water use for per unit gross domestic product (m3/104 RMB ¥);
- GDWU :
-
the maximum water use for per unit gross domestic product (m3/104 RMB ¥);
- GM :
-
gross domestic product of the primary industries (RMB ¥);
- GML :
-
the lower-bound economic indicators;
- GMU :
-
the upper-bound economic indicators;
- GN :
-
gross domestic product of the secondary industries (RMB ¥);
- GNL :
-
the lower-bound economic indicators;
- GNU :
-
the upper-bound economic indicators;
- GO :
-
gross domestic product of the tertiary industries (RMB ¥);
- GOL :
-
the lower-bound economic indicators;
- GOU :
-
the upper-bound economic indicators;
- K :
-
the loss rate of maximum economic impact of water pollution on each calculation sub-item (where K1, K2, K3, and K4 correspond to the domestic, primary, secondary, and tertiary industries, respectively);
- L :
-
the length of the planning horizon (day);
- PCM :
-
pollutant concentration of wastewater from the primary industries (mg/L);
- PCN :
-
pollutant concentration of wastewater from the secondary industries (mg/L);
- PCO :
-
pollutant concentration of wastewater from the tertiary industries (mg/L);
- PCP :
-
pollutant concentration of wastewater from the domestic (mg/L);
- PDWL :
-
the minimum per capita water consumption (m3/person);
- PDWU :
-
the maximum per capita water consumption (m3/person);
- PE :
-
the system pollutant emissions (104 tones);
- PN :
-
the population scale of each region;
- PNL :
-
the lower-bound demographic indicators;
- PNU :
-
the upper-bound demographic indicators;
- Q :
-
the availabilities of different water resources (m3);
- SB :
-
the system social benefits (RMB ¥);
- TPP :
-
the amount of available pollutant emissions (104 tones);
- TWP :
-
the amount of available wastewater emissions (104 m3);
- UCW :
-
the treatment cost for per wastewater (RMB ¥/ m3), which is related to the regional water quality;
- UEC :
-
the cost for unit expansion (RMB ¥/ m3);
- UFP :
-
the amount of grain yield per unit of water use (ton/ m3);
- VM :
-
the cost coefficient with regard to the primary industries (RMB ¥/ m3);
- VN :
-
the cost coefficient with regard to the secondary industries (RMB ¥/ m3);
- VO :
-
the cost coefficient with regard to the tertiary industries (RMB ¥/ m3);
- VP :
-
the cost coefficient with regard to the domestic sector (RMB ¥/ m3);
- WCP :
-
the wastewater treatment capacity (m3/day);
- WF :
-
largest per capita water footprint in different regions and periods, which equals to 2 in this study.
- WMAX :
-
the variation range of average water quality of lakes in the region;
- WMIN :
-
the variation range of average water quality of rivers in the region;
- xm :
-
the optimal amount of water allocation to the primary industries (m3);
- XMMAX :
-
the maximum amount of water demand in terms of the primary industries (m3);
- XMMIN :
-
the minimum amount of water demand in terms of the primary industries (m3);
- xn :
-
the optimal amount of water allocation to the secondary industries (m3);
- XNMAX :
-
the maximum amount of water demand in terms of the secondary industries (m3);
- XNMIN :
-
the minimum amount of water demand in terms of the secondary industries (m3);
- xo:
-
the optimal amount of water allocation to the tertiary industries (m3);
- XOMAX :
-
the maximum amount of water demand in terms of the tertiary industries (m3);
- XOMIN :
-
the minimum amount of water demand in terms of the tertiary industries (m3);
- xp :
-
the optimal amount of water allocation to the domestic (m3);
- XPMAX :
-
the maximum amount of water demand in terms of the domestic (m3);
- XPMIN :
-
the minimum amount of water demand in terms of the domestic (m3);
- y :
-
the binary variable with a value of 0 (no expansion) or 1 (expansion);
- αm :
-
the fairness coefficient of the primary industries water use;
- αn :
-
the fairness coefficient of the secondary industries water use;
- αo :
-
the fairness coefficient of the tertiary industries water use;
- αp :
-
the fairness coefficient of the domestic water use;
- η :
-
the removal rate of pollutants;
- λm :
-
economic loss rate caused by pollution from the primary industries (%);
- λn :
-
economic loss rate caused by pollution from the secondary industries (%);
- λo :
-
economic loss rate caused by pollution from the tertiary industries (%);
- λp :
-
the individual economic losses caused by domestic water pollution (RMB ¥).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Lu, H., Li, J. et al. Multi-Level Decision-Making for Inter-Regional Water Resources Management with Water Footprint Analysis and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Water Resour Manage 35, 481–503 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02727-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02727-w