Abstract
Entropy weight method (EWM) is a widely used weighting approach in water quality evaluation that assigns weights according to the discriminating degree of indicators. A higher discrete degree corresponds to a larger weight requirement, and vice versa. By using two water quality evaluation examples, this study proves that the weighting result of EWM cannot accurately reflect the information content and discriminability of indices in many conditions. For the EWM that uses the directly generating quotient (DGQ) in standardization, when the concentration dataset contains many zero values, the EWM results become prone to distortion. Similarly, for the EWM that utilizes the generating quotient after range pretreatment (GQARP) in standardization, when similar maximum values are present in the concentration dataset, the EWM results become prone to distortion. From the distortion weighting results of EWM, those indicators with high pollution degrees can be easily neglected, thereby leading to overoptimistic comprehensive water quality evaluation results. Although the source of distortion in the EWM results can be traced to the standardization and ranging processes, a solution to this problem is not yet available. In sum, the conventional EWM cannot correctly reflect the distinction of water quality indices; and it cannot be directly applied in water quality evaluation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Bereskie T, Haider H, Rodriguez MJ (2017) Framework for continuous performance improvement in small drinking water systems. Sci Total Environ 574:1405–1414
Chang J, Li Y, Wang Y, Yuan M (2016) Copula-based drought risk assessment combined with an integrated index in the Wei River basin, China. J Hydrol 540:824–834
Chen J, Zhang YL, Chen ZY, Nie ZL (2015) Improving assessment of groundwater sustainability with analytic hierarchy process and information entropy method: a case study of the Hohhot plain, China. Environ Earth Sci 73:2353–2363
Ding XW, Chong X, Bao ZF, Xue Y, Zhang SH (2017) Fuzzy comprehensive assessment method based on the entropy weight method and its application in the water environmental safety evaluation of the Heshangshan drinking water source area, three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Water 9:1–15
Dong GH, Shen JQ, Jia YZ, Sun FH (2018) Comprehensive evaluation of water resource security: case Study from Luoyang City, China. Water 10:119–129
Feng Y, Ling L, Yanfeng L (2015) A dynamic water quality index model based on functional data analysis. Ecol Indic 57:249–258
Feng Y, Bao Q, Xiao X, Ma L (2016) Geo-accumulation vector model for evaluating the heavy metal pollution in the sediments of Western Dongting Lake[J]. J Hydrol 2019(573):40–48
Feng Y, Fanghui Y, Li C (2019) Improved entropy weighting model in water quality evaluation. Water Resour Manag 33(6):2049–2056
Juwana I, Muttil N, Perera BJC (2012) Indicator-based water sustainability assessment — a review. Sci Total Environ 438:357–371
Kamrani S, Rezaei M, Amiri V, Saberinasr A (2016) Investigating the efficiency of information entropy and fuzzy theories to classification of groundwater samples for drinking purposes: Lenjanat plain, Central Iran. Environ Earth Sci 75:1370–1380
Li XG, Wei X, Huang Q (2012) Comprehensive entropy weight observability-controllability risk analysis and its application to water resource decision-making. Water SA 38:573–579
Li PY, Wu JH, Qian H, Lyu XS, Liu HW (2014) Origin and assessment of groundwater pollution and associated health risk: a case study in an industrial park, Northwest China. Environ Geochem Health 36:693–712
Li PY, Li XY, Meng XY, Li MN, Zhang YT (2016) Appraising groundwater quality and health risks from contamination in a semiarid region of Northwest China. Exposure Health 8:361–379
Men BH, Liu HL, Tian W, Liu HY (2017) Evaluation of sustainable use of water resources in Beijing based on rough set and fuzzy theory. Water 9:1–17
Sahoo MM, Patra KC, Swain JB, Khatua KK (2016) Evaluation of water quality with application of Bayes' rule and entropy weight method. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 21(6):1–23
Taheriyoun M, Karamouz M, Baghvand A (2010) Development of an entropy-based fuzzy eutrophication index for reservoir water quality evaluation. Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng 7:1–14
Wang D, Singh VP, Zhu YS (2007) Hybrid fuzzy and optimal modeling for water quality evaluation. Water Resour Res 43:10–17
Wang YK, Sheng D, Wang D, Ma HQ, Wu JC, Xu F (2014) Variable fuzzy set theory to assess water quality of the Meiliang Bay in Taihu Lake Basin. Water Resour Manag 28(3):867–880
Wang D, Zeng DB, Singh VP, Xu PC, Liu DF, Wang YK, Zeng XK, Wu JC, Wang LC (2016) A multidimension cloud model-based approach for water quality assessment. Environ Res 149:113–121
Yang J, Chang J, Wang Y, Li Y, Hu H, Chen Y (2017) Comprehensive drought characteristics analysis based on a nonlinear multivariate drought index. J Hydrol 557:651–667
Zou ZH, Yi Y, Sun JN (2006) Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. J Environ Sci 18:1020–1023
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under the contract No. 2017CFB312, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the contract No. 51709142, the Natural Science Foundation of Water Resource Department of Hunan Government (No. 201723041), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2017B20514).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bao, Q., Yuxin, Z., Yuxiao, W. et al. Can Entropy Weight Method Correctly Reflect the Distinction of Water Quality Indices?. Water Resour Manage 34, 3667–3674 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02641-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02641-1