Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the Sensitivity of Projected Reservoir Reliability to the Choice of Climate Projection: A Case Study of Bull Run Watershed, Portland, Oregon

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change has the potential to alter the quantity and timing of runoff, which may pose significant challenges for reservoir management. One challenge is developing operating policies for an unknown and uncertain future. Here, we develop a suite of ‘optimal’ operating policies for the reservoir system of Portland, Oregon. We assess the sensitivity of projected reservoir reliability to the choice of GCMs and time periods used to develop each of our policies. Results indicate that, while different GCMs and fitting periods produce different optimal operating policies, when those policies are applied across all the other GCM scenarios, the overall projected reliability does not change due to the great variability between simulations. Across the simulations, we note a trend of decreasing reliability in the future which is not sensitive to the choice of GCM or fitting period. This indicates that the projected reliability is dominated by uncertainty in climate projections that cannot be mitigated by tuning operating policies to projected changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya A, Piechota TC, Tootle G (2011) Quantitative assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology of the North Platte River watershed, Wyoming. J Hydrol Eng 17(10):1071–1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguado E, Cayan D, Riddle L, Roos M (1992) Climatic fluctuations and the timing of West Coast streamflow. J Clim 5(12):1468–1483

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekke L, Thrasher BL, Maurer EP, Pruitt T (2013) Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate and hydrology projections: Release of downscaled CMIP5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs. US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Services Center, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang H, Praskievicz S, Parandvash H (2014) Sensitivity of urban water consumption to weather and climate variability at multiple temporal scales: The case of Portland Oregon. Int J Geospatial Environ Res 1(1):7

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Leconte R (2011) Uncertainty of downscaling method in quantifying the impact of climate change on hydrology. J Hydrol 401:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Chaumont D, Braun M (2013) Finding appropriate bias correction methods in downscaling precipitation for hydrologic impact studies over North America. Water Resour Res 49(7):4187–4205

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Leon AS, Engle SP, Fuentes C, Chen Q (2017) Offline training for improving online performance of a genetic algorithm based optimization model for hourly multi-reservoir operation. Environ Model Softw 96:46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen ns, Wood AW, Voisin N, Lettenmaier DP, Palmer RN (2004) The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin. Clim Change 62(1–3):337–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung F, Anderson J, Arora S, Ejeta M, Galef J, Kadir T, Kao K, Olson A, Quan C, Reyes E, Roos M, Seneviratne S, Wang J, Yin H, Blomquist N (2009) Using Future Climate Projections to Support Water Resources Decision Making in California. PIER Research Report, California Energy Commission

  • Das T, Hidalgo HG, Pierce DW, Barnett TP, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR, Bonfils C, Bala G, Mirin A (2009) Structure and detectability of trends in hydrological measures over the western United States. J Hydrometeorol 10(4):871–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettinger MD, Cayan DR (1995) Large-scale atmospheric forcing of recent trends toward early snowmelt runoff in California. J Clim 8(3):606–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettinger MD, Cayan DR, Meyer MK, Jeton AE (2004) Simulated hydrologic responses to climate variations and change in the Merced, Carson, and American River basins, Sierra Nevada, California, 1900–2099. Climatic Change 62(1–3):283–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson-Lange SE, Mitchell R (2014) "Modeling the effects of climate change projections on streamflow in the Nooksack River basin. Northwest Washington” Hydrological Processes 28(20):5236–5250

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisel LM (1972) “Chance constrained reservoir model”. Water Resour Res 8(2):339–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HJ, Ekström M (2009) Multi-model ensemble estimates of climate change impacts on UK seasonal precipitation extremes. Int J Climatol 29(3):385–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritze H, Stewart IT, Pebesma E (2011) Shifts in western North American snowmelt runoff regimes for the recent warm decades. J Hydrometeorol 12(5):989–1006

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuntoli I, Villarini G, Prudhomme C, Hannah DM (2018) Uncertainties in projected runoff over the conterminous United States. Clim Change 150:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlet AF (2011) Assessing water resources adaptive capacity to climate change impacts in the Pacific Northwest Region of North America. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(5):1427

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlet AF, Lettenmaier DP (2007) Effects of 20th century warming and climate variability on flood risk in the western US. Water Resour Res 43:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding BL, Wood AW, Prairie JR (2012) The implications of climate change scenario selection for future streamflow projection in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(11):3989–4007

    Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Virkkala R, Toivonen H (2009) Climate change and freshwater biodiversity: detected patterns, future trends and adaptations in northern regions. Biol Rev 84(1):39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman JD, Giuliani M (2018) Policy tree optimization for threshold-based water resources management over multiple timescales. Environ Model Softw 99:39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton P, Schaefli B, Mezghani A, Hingray B, Musy A (2006) Assessment of climate-change impacts on alpine discharge regimes with climate model uncertainty. Hydrol Process 20(10):2091–2109

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington TG, Billmire M (2014) Trends in precipitation, runoff, and evapotranspiration for rivers draining to the Gulf of Maine in the United States. J Hydrometeorol 15(2):726–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Houck MH (1982) Annual and monthly reservoir operating rules generated by deterministic optimization. Water Resour Res 18(5):1337–1344

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay AL, Davies HN, Bell VA, Jones RG (2009) Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England. Clim Change 92:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakew HB, Moges SA, Asfaw DH (2017) Hydrological evaluation of satellite and reanalysis precipitation products in the Upper Blue Nile Basin: A case study of Gilgel Abbay. Hydrology 4(3):39

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S-Y, Hamlet AF, Fitzgerald CJ, Burges SJ (2009) Optimized flood control in the Columbia River Basin for a global warming scenario. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135(6):440–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Xu, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Burges SJ (1994) A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J Geophys Res Atmos 99(D7):14415–14428

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez A, Fung F, New M, Watts G, Weston A, Wilby RL (2009) From climate model ensembles to climate change impacts and adaptation: A case study of water resource management in the southwest of England. Water Resour Res 45:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP (1970) Some comments on linear decision rules and chance constraints. Water Resour Res 6(2):668–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce CH, Holden ZA (2009) Declining annual streamflow distributions in the Pacific Northwest United States, 1948–2006. Geophys Res Lett 36(16):L16401

  • Lundquist JD, Dettinger MD, IT Stewart, DR Cayan (2009) Variability and trends in spring runoff in the western United States. Climate warming in western North America: evidence and environmental effects. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 63–76

  • Maurer EP, Wood AW, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP, Nijssen B (2002) A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. J Clim 15(22):3237–3251

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer EP, Brekke L, Pruitt T, Duffy PB (2007) Fine-resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies. Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union 88(47):504–504

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe GJ, Clark MP (2005) Trends and variability in snowmelt runoff in the western United States. J Hydrometeorol 6(4):476–482

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon TA, Adeloye AJ, Zhou Sen-Lin (2006) Understanding performance measures of reservoirs. J Hydrol 324:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Mereu S, Sušnik J, Trabucco A, Daccache A, Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia L, Renoldi S, Virdis A, Savić D, Assimacopoulos D (2016) Operational resilience of reservoirs to climate change, agricultural demand, and tourism: a case study from Sardinia. Sci Total Environ 543:1028–1038

    Google Scholar 

  • Mote PW (2006) Climate-driven variability and trends in mountain snowpack in western North America. J Clim 19(23):6209–6220

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak A, Marks D, Chandler DG, Seyfried M (2010) Long-term snow, climate, and streamflow trends at the Reynolds Creek experimental watershed, Owyhee Mountains, Idaho, United States. Water Resour Res 46(6):W06519

  • Nover DM, Witt JW, Butcher JB, Johnson TE, Weaver CP (2016) The effects of downscaling method on the variability of simulated watershed response to climate change in five us basins. Earth Interact 20(11):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 151

  • Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Das T, Maurer EP, Miller NL, Bao Y, Kanamitsu M et al (2013) The key role of heavy precipitation events in climate model disagreements of future annual precipitation changes in California. J Clim 26(16):5879–5896

    Google Scholar 

  • Polade SD, Gershunov A, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD, Pierce DW (2017) Precipitation in a warming world: Assessing projected hydro-climate changes in California and other Mediterranean climate regions. Sci Rep 7(1):10783

    Google Scholar 

  • Prudhomme C, Davies H (2009) Assessing uncertainties in climate change impact analyses on the river flow regimes in the UK. Part 2: future climate. Clim Change 93:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Regonda S, Kumar B, Rajagopalan M, Clark (2005) and John Pitlick. “Seasonal cycle shifts in hydroclimatology over the western United States. J Clim 18(2):372–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell DP (2006) A demonstration of the uncertainty in projections of UK climate change resulting from regional model formulation. Clim Change 79:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Stagge JH, Glenn E, Moglen (2017) Water Resources Adaptation to Climate and Demand Change in the Potomac River. J Hydrol Eng 22(11):04017050

    Google Scholar 

  • Stakhiv EZ, Werick W, Robert W, Brumbaugh RW (2016) Evolution of drought management policies and practices in the United States. Water Policy 18:122–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart IT, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2004) Changes in snowmelt runoff timing in western North America under abusiness as usual’climate change scenario. Clim Change 62:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart IT, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2005) Changes toward earlier streamflow timing across western North America. J Clim 18(8):1136–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, working group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5). New York

  • Teutschbein C, Wetterhall F, Seibert J (2011) Evaluation of different downscaling techniques for hydrological climate-change impact studies at the catchment scale. Clim Dyn 37:9–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Xiao-jun, Zhang Jian-yun, Shahid S, Guan En-hong, Wu Yong-xiang, Juan Gao J, He Rui-min (2016) Adaptation to climate change impacts on water demand. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 21(1):81–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Harris I (2006) A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK. Water Resour Res 42(2):W02419

  • Woldemeskel FM, Sharma A, Sivakumar B, Mehrotra R (2016) Quantification of precipitation and temperature uncertainties simulated by CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 121(1):3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood AW, Maurer EP, Kumar A, Lettenmaier DP (2002) Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States. J Geophys Res Atmos 107:D20

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Guo S, Liu P, Xu Chong-yu, Zhao X (2016) “Derivation of water and power operating rules for multi-reservoirs”. Hydrol Sci J 61(2):359–370

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was sponsored by the Urban Resilience to Extremes Sustainability Research Network (UREx SRN) under National Science Foundation (NSF) grant AGS‐1444755.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA

    Nima Fayaz & David G. Chandler

  2. Department of Hydrology & Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Laura E. Condon

Authors
  1. Nima Fayaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura E. Condon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David G. Chandler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nima Fayaz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fayaz, N., Condon, L.E. & Chandler, D.G. Evaluating the Sensitivity of Projected Reservoir Reliability to the Choice of Climate Projection: A Case Study of Bull Run Watershed, Portland, Oregon. Water Resour Manage 34, 1991–2009 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02542-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02542-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation