Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid Constructed Wetland Selection as a Group Decision-Making Problem

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a framework based on the group analytic hierarchy process for identifying most desirable technologies for constructed wetland segmentation. A method is defined how to select decision makers whose evaluations should be included into the group decision by calculating different consistency and statistical conformity measures, and their aggregation into the new metrics. The consistency ratio, the total Euclidean distance, and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient are used to create the three two-dimensional metrics and the one three-dimensional metric to determine the distances of the decision makers from the reference points corresponding to full consistency and statistical conformity. The mapping the decision makers into the consistency/conformity scatter plots enables visualizing the outlier(s), that is, the decision makers who have different opinions about which technologies to apply in wetland segmentation than the decision makers on average. The scatter plots may guide the decision-making process towards grouping the decision makers into sub groups, thus heading towards consensus in both sub groups and global group. The approach is demonstrated on a numerical example application in which five decision makers are assessing six criteria of a constructed wetland segmentation selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Condon E, Golden B, Lele S, Raghavan S, Wasil E (2002) A visualization model based on adjacency data. Decis Support Syst 33:349–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condon E, Golden B, Wasil E (2003) Visualizing group decisions in the analytic hierarchy process. Comput Oper Res 30:1435–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou T, Troesch S, Petitjean A, Gábor PT, Esser D (2017) Wastewater and rainwater Management in Urban Areas: a role for constructed wetlands. Procedia Environ Sci 37:535–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2007) Aggregation of individual preference structures in Ahp-group decision making. Group Decis Negot 16:287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman E, Peniwati K (1998) Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operations Research 108:165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Z, Feng C, Wang X, Zhang J (2016) Seasonal applicability of three vegetation constructed floating treatment wetlands for nutrient removal and harvesting strategy in urban storm water retention ponds. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 112:80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons JD (1971) Nonparametric statistical inference. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gikas GD, Tsihrintzis VA (2014) Municipal wastewater treatment using constructed wetlands. Water Utility Journal 8:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Golany B, Kress M (1993) A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. Eur J Oper Res 69:210–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F (2001) Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations. European Journal of Operations Research 129:372–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land M, Granéli W, Grimvall A, Hoffmann CC, Mitsch WJ, Tonderski KS, Verhoeven JTA (2016) How effective are created or restored freshwater wetlands for nitrogen and phosphorus removal? A systematic review. Environ Evid 5:9–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0060-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Zhang, M., Liu, F., Chen, L., Wu, J. (2018). Seasonality distribution of the abundance and activity of nitrification and denitrification microorganisms in sediments of surface flow constructed wetlands planted with Myriophyllum elatinoides during swine wastewater treatment. Bioresource technology 248 (part B): 89-97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaevangelou V, Gikas GD, Tsihrintzis VA (2016) Effect of operational and design parameters on performance of pilot-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands Treating University campus wastewater. Water Resour Manag 30:5875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (2018) Global wetland outlook: state of the World's wetlands and their services to people. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. Available online at, Gland https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/flipbooks/ramsar_gwo_english_web.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha V, Manikandan NA, Pakshirajan K, Chaturvedi R (2017) Continuous removal of Cr(VI) from wastewater by phytoextraction using Tradescantia pallida plant based vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland system. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 119:96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic B (2005) Combining different prioritization methods in AHP synthesis. Comput Oper Res 25:1897–1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic B, Srdjevic Z, Suvocarev K (2017) Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment technologies in constructed wetlands. European Water 58:165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic B, Srdjevic Z, Lakicevic M (2018a) Validating the importance of criteria for assessing climate change scenarios. Water and Climate Change 09(3):570–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic B., Galambos L., Srdjevic Z. (2018b): What are preconditions and who are the actors in establishing FLOOD retentions on private lands: experience from Serbia. LAND4FLOOD workshop, Riga, Latvia

  • Sudarsan JS, Annadurai R, Mukhopadhyay M et al (2018) Sustainanable Water Resources Management 4:781–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsihrintzis VA (2017) The use of vertical flow constructed wetlands in wastewater treatment. Water Resour Manag 31:3245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven JTA, Meuleman AFM (1999) Wetlands for wastewater treatment: opportunities and limitations. Ecol Eng 12(1):5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2000) On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP. Eur J Oper Res 126:683–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zidan ARA, El-Gamal MM, Rashed AA, Eid MAAE (2015) Wastewater treatment in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands using different media (setup stage). Water Science 29:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia under the grant 174003 (2011-2019) - Theory and application of Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria decision making under conditions of risk and uncertainty (individual and group context).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zorica Srđević.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srđević, Z., Srđević, B., Suvočarev, K. et al. Hybrid Constructed Wetland Selection as a Group Decision-Making Problem. Water Resour Manage 34, 295–310 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02444-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02444-z

Keywords

Navigation