Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of Water Management Scenarios Using Coupled Hydrological and System Dynamics Modeling

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The North China Plain (NCP) has been affected by severe water scarcity over the past several decades. To address this issue, several water management plans have already been launched. Among them, the new South-to-North Water Diversion Project (SNWDP) draws the most attention. However, the effectiveness of the SNWDP is yet to be evaluated. In the present study, we developed a coupled hydrological and system dynamics (SD) model to analyze water management scenarios for the NCP: S1: business as usual, S2: less agricultural water, S3: more domestic and industrial water reuse, S4: SNWDP, and S5: combined efforts. The impact of climate change has been accounted for in all scenarios. The SD model was based on VENSIM, and the hydrological model was based on the MIKE SHE code. The results indicated that the groundwater development in the NCP will not be sustainable without exploiting the full potential of the SNWDP resource. However, the SNWDP alone can only lessen the water crisis, it is not able to stop the groundwater storage from further declining. Solving the water scarcity problem in the NCP will require a combination of highly reduced water use and a continued water supply from the SNWDP. Our results also indicated that innovative water saving technologies are urgently needed in the restructuring of the industrial sector. Furthermore, the study illustrated an added challenge to water management since the uncertainty range on climate change impacts are shown to be of the same magnitude as the impacts of combined management measures. Therefore, it requires great caution when making the future water management strategies in the NCP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, Oconnell PE, Rasmussen J (1986a) An introduction to the european hydrological system - systeme hydrologique europeen, she .1. History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. J Hydrol 87(1–2):45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, Oconnell PE, Rasmussen J (1986b) An introduction to the european hydrological system - systeme hydrologique europeen, she .2. Structure of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. J Hydrol 87(1–2):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anandhi A, Frei A, Pierson DC, Schneiderman EM, Zion MS, Lounsbury D, Matonse AH (2011) Examination of change factor methodologies for climate change impact assessment. Water Resour Res 47

  • Camara AS, Viegas MG, Amaro A (1986) Interfacing system dynamics and multiobjective programming for regional water-resources planning. Ann Reg Sci 20(3):104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao G, Zheng C, Scanlon BR, Liu J, Li W (2013) Use of flow modeling to assess sustainability of groundwater resources in the North China plain. Water Resour Res 49(1):159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Zong L, Zhou J, Li P, Gao Y (2018) Bank of China report, outlook of China’s economy (in chinese). Beijing, Global Economic Research Institute, BOC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong CL, Schoups G, van de Giesen N (2013) Scenario development for water resource planning and management: a review. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 80(4):749–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durham B, Rinck-Pfeiffer S, Guendert D (2003) Integrated water resource management - through reuse and aquifer recharge. Desalination 152(1–3):333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1988) Principles of systems (system dynamics series). Productivity Press

  • Graham DN, Butts M (2005) Flexible integrated watershed modelling with mike she. Press, CRC

    Google Scholar 

  • Han DM, Cao GL (2018) Phase difference between groundwater storage changes and groundwater level fluctuations due to compaction of an aquifer-aquitard system. J Hydrol 566:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins E, Sutton R (2011) The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change. Clim Dyn 37(1–2):407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekema DJ, Sridhar V (2013) A system dynamics model for conjunctive management of water resources in the snake river basin. J Am Water Resour Assoc 49(6):1327–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojberg AL, Troldborg L, Stisen S, Christensen BBS, Henriksen HJ (2013) Stakeholder driven update and improvement of a national water resources model. Environ Model Softw 40:202–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Icekson-Tal N, Avraham O, Sack J, Cikurel H (2003) Water reuse in Israel - the dan region project: evaluation of water quality and reliability of plant’s operation. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 3(4):231–237

  • IPCC (2013) The physical science basis, contribution of working group to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P. M. Midgley. United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press

  • Jia YW, Wang H, Zhou ZH, Qiu YQ (2006) Development of the wep-l distributed hydrological model and dynamic assessment of water resources in the yellow river basin. J Hydrol 331(3–4):606–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Luo YF, Ahmad A (2009) Analysing complex behaviour of hydrological systems through a system dynamics approach. Environ Model Softw 24(12):1363–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ye SY, Wei AH, Zhou PP, Wang LH (2017) Modelling the response of shallow groundwater levels to combined climate and water-diversion scenarios in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei plain, China. Hydrogeol J 25(6):1733–1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald GM (2010) Water, climate change, and sustainability in the southwest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(50):21256–21262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirchi A, Madani K, Watkins D, Ahmad S (2012) Synthesis of system dynamics tools for holistic conceptualization of water resources problems. Water Resour Manag 26(9):2421–2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MWR (2008) Ministry of water resources report, water resources bulletin of china (in chinese)

  • NBS (2010) National bureau of statistics report, China statistical yearbook (in chinese). China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Oki T, Kanae S (2006) Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science 313(5790):1068–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin H, Sun A C-t, Liu J, Zheng C (2012) System dynamics analysis of water supply and demand in the North China plain. Water Policy 14(2):214–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin H, Cao G, Kristensen M, Refsgaard JC, Rasmussen MO, He X, Liu J, Shu Y, Zheng C (2013) Integrated hydrological modeling of the North China plain and implications for sustainable water management. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(10):3759–3778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard JC, Knudsen J (1996) Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resour Res 32(7):2189–2202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaby LP, Refsgaard JC, Sonnenborg TO, Stisen S, Christensen JH, Jensen KH (2013) Assessment of robustness and significance of climate change signals for an ensemble of distribution-based scaled climate projections. J Hydrol 486:479–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu YQ, Villholth KG, Jensen KH, Stisen S, Lei YP (2012) Integrated hydrological modeling of the North China plain: options for sustainable groundwater use in the alluvial plain of mt. Taihang. J Hydrol 464:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teutschbein C, Seibert J (2013) Is bias correction of regional climate model (rcm) simulations possible for non-stationary conditions? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(12):5061–5077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEF (2015) World economic forum report, global risks 2015. Geneva

  • Winz I, Brierley G, Trowsdale S (2009) The use of system dynamics simulation in water resources management. Water Resour Manag 23(7):1301–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Wang Q, Zhang X, Wang R, She DX (2018) Assessing the influence of climate change and inter-basin water diversion on haihe river basin, eastern China: a coupled model approach. Hydrogeol J 26(5):1455–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZX, Takeuchi K, Ishidaira H, Zhang XW (2002) Sustainability analysis for yellow river water resources using the system dynamics approach. Water Resour Manag 16(3):239–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YQ, Mo XG, Cai YL, Li XB (2005) Analysis on groundwater table drawdown by land use and the quest for sustainable water use in the Hebei plain in China. Agric Water Manag 75(1):38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao YY, Zheng CM, Andrews C, He X, Zhang AJ, Liu J (2019) Integration of groundwater into china's south-north water transfer strategy. Sci Total Environ 658:550–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Li GM (2014) Influence of south-to-north water diversion on major cones of depression in North China plain. Environ Earth Sci 71(9):3845–3853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C, Liu J, Cao G, Kendy E, Wang H, Jia Y (2010) Can China cope with its water crisis?-perspectives from the North China plain. Ground Water 48(3):350–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the National Key R&D Program of China, project number 2016YFC0401404; the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), grant numbers 41861124003, 41701042 and 41807179; the DANIDA fund, project File No. 17-M08-GEU. Skylor Steed is thanked for his help in the English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment, East China Institute of Technology, Nanchang, 330013, Jiangxi, China

    Huanhuan Qin

  2. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China

    Chunmiao Zheng

  3. Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, China

    Xin He

  4. Department of Hydrology, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Oester Voldgade 10, 1350, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Xin He & Jens Christian Refsgaard

Authors
  1. Huanhuan Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chunmiao Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jens Christian Refsgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunmiao Zheng or Xin He.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qin, H., Zheng, C., He, X. et al. Analysis of Water Management Scenarios Using Coupled Hydrological and System Dynamics Modeling. Water Resour Manage 33, 4849–4863 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02410-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02410-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation