Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation of a New Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Performance in the Optimal Operation of Multi-Reservoir Benchmark Systems

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reservoirs’ optimal operation is a critical issue in the management of surface water resources. In the present study, after combining the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) with genetic algorithm (GA), which is called hybrid whale-genetic algorithm (HWGA), the precision and convergence rate of HWGA is evaluated in the optimal operation of continuous-time four-reservoir benchmark system (FRBS) and ten-reservoir benchmark system (TRBS). This combination benefits from the GA high precision and the WOA high convergence rate. The precision and convergence rate of HWGA, GA, and WOA are compared to the absolute optimum solution, obtained using Lingo software. Results indicated that the absolute optimal solution was 308.292 in the FRBS and 1194.441 in the TRBS. The best optimal solutions using the HWGA, GA and WOA were 96.08%, 95.76%, and 85.19% of the absolute optimal in the FRBS, respectively, and 97.24%, 89.54%, and 84.42% of the absolute optimal in the TRBS, respectively. So, the precision of HWGA, GA and WOA ranked first to third, respectively. Also, the variation coefficient of HWGA solutions (0.006 in the FRBS and 0.011 in the TRBS) had the lowest value in both benchmark systems. The variation coefficients of GA and WOA solutions were 1.24 and 3.57 times the variation coefficient of HWGA in the FRBS, respectively, and 1.55 and 5.32 times the variation coefficient of HWGA in the TRBS, respectively. Therefore, it could be concluded that in the current study the HWGA solutions variation range was narrower than other algorithms’ solutions. According to four criteria of the objective function average, standard deviation, number of population, and maximum number of iterations, the performance of the algorithms in the present study is compared to the performance of some algorithms in other literatures using Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The results of TOPSIS indicated that HWGA ranked first and WOA ranked last in both benchmark systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadianfar I, Adib A, Salarijazi M (2015) Optimizing multireservoir operation: hybrid of bat algorithm and differential evolution. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142(2):05015010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorg-Haddad O, Moravej M, Loáiciga HA (2014) Application of the water cycle algorithm to the optimal operation of reservoir systems. J Irrig Drain Eng 141(5):04014064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, V. T. and Cortes-Rivera, G. (1974). Application of DDDP in water resources planning. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, water resources center, Hydrosystems laboratory, Urbana, Illinois, final report, project no. B-060-ILL

  • Dehghani, M. J., Montazeri, Z., Dehghani, A. and Seifi, A. (2017). Spring search algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization algorithm inspired by Hooke's law. In: IEEE 4th international conference on knowledge-based engineering and innovation (KBEI), pp. 210–214

  • Ehteram M, Karami H, Mousavi SF, El-Shafie A, Amini Z (2017) Optimizing dam and reservoirs operation based model utilizing shark algorithm approach. Knowl-Based Syst 122:26–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garousi-Nejad I, Bozorg-Haddad O, Loáiciga HA, Mariño MA (2016) Application of the firefly algorithm to optimal operation of reservoirs with the purpose of irrigation supply and hydropower production. J Irrig Drain Eng 142(10):04016041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini-Moghari SM, Morovati R, Moghadas M, Araghinejad S (2015) Optimum operation of reservoir using two evolutionary algorithms: imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) and cuckoo optimization algorithm (COA). Water Resour Manag 29(10):3749–3769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 58–191

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Lai YJ, Liu TY (1993) A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput Oper Res 20(8):889–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jadhav AN, Gomathi N (2018) WGC: hybridization of exponential grey wolf optimizer with whale optimization for data clustering. Alexandria Eng J 57(3):1569–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jothiprakash V, Shanthi G, Arunkumar R (2011) Development of operational policy for a multi-reservoir system in India using genetic algorithm. Water Resour Manag 25(10):2405–2423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karami, H., Ehteram, M., Mousavi, S. F., Farzin, S., Kisi, O. and El-Shafie, A. (2018). Optimization of energy management and conversion in the water systems based on evolutionary algorithms. Neural computing and applications, 1-14

  • Kaveh A, Ghazaan MI (2017) Enhanced whale optimization algorithm for sizing optimization of skeletal structures. Mech-Based Design Struct Mach 45(3):345–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan B, Singh P (2017) Selecting a meta-heuristic technique for smart micro-grid optimization problem: a comprehensive analysis. IEEE Access 5:13951–13977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Yadav SM (2018) Optimization of reservoir operation with a new approach in evolutionary computation using TLBO algorithm and Jaya algorithm. Water Resour Manag 32(13):4375–4391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madani K (2014) Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? J Environ Stud Sci 4(4):315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri A, Aminnejad B, Ahmadi H (2018) Introducing modified version of penguins search optimization algorithm (PeSOA) and its application in optimal operation of reservoir systems. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 18(4):1484–1496

  • Mirjalili, S. (2019). Genetic Algorithm. PP. 43–55. In: Mirjalili, S. (Ed.), Evolutionary Algorithms and Neural Networks: Theory and Applications, Springer

  • Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravej M, Hosseini-Moghari SM (2016) Large scale reservoirs system operation optimization: the interior search algorithm (ISA) approach. Water Resour Manag 30(10):3389–3407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray DM, Yakowitz SJ (1979) Constrained differential dynamic programming and its application to multireservoir control. Water Resour Res 15(5):1017–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliva D, El Aziz MA, Hassanien AE (2017) Parameter estimation of photovoltaic cells using an improved chaotic whale optimization algorithm. Appl Energy 200:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poe, W. and Mokhatab, S. (2017). Modeling, control, and optimization of natural gas processing plants. 1st edition, gulf professional publishing, pp. 173-213

  • Qaderi K, Akbarifard S, Madadi MR, Bakhtiari B (2018) Optimal operation of multi-reservoirs by water cycle algorithm. Proc Inst Civ Eng- Water Manag 171(4):179–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabiei MH, Aalami MT, Talatahari S (2018) Reservoir operation optimization using CBO, ECBO and VPS algorithms. Int J Optimiz Civ Eng 8(3):489–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy PDP, Reddy VV, Manohar TG (2017) Whale optimization algorithm for optimal sizing of renewable resources for loss reduction in distribution systems. Renewables: Wind, Water, and Solar 4(1):3

  • Solgi M, Bozorg-Haddad O, Loáiciga HA (2017) The enhanced honey-bee mating optimization algorithm for water resources optimization. Water Resour Manag 31(3):885–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun P, Jiang ZQ, Wang TT, Zhang YK (2016) Research and application of parallel normal cloud mutation shuffled frog leaping algorithm in cascade reservoirs optimal operation. Water Resour Manag 30(3):1019–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touma HJ (2016) Study of the economic dispatch problem on IEEE 30-bus system using whale optimization algorithm. Int J Eng Tech Sci (IJETS) 5(1):11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaseen ZM, Allawi MF, Karami H, Ehteram M, Farzin S, Ahmed AN, Binti Koting S, Syuhadaa Mohd N, Binti Jaafar WZ, Afan HA, El-Shafie A (2019) A hybrid bat-swarm algorithm for optimizing dam and reservoir operation. Neural Comput & Applic:1–15

  • Yoon K (1987) A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions. J Oper Res Soc 38(3):277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction. SAGE publications, California

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas EK, Zakarevicius A, Antucheviciene J (2006) Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions. Informatica 17(4):601–618

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Farzin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest with any person or institution.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadi, M., Farzin, S., Mousavi, SF. et al. Investigation of a New Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Performance in the Optimal Operation of Multi-Reservoir Benchmark Systems. Water Resour Manage 33, 4767–4782 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02393-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02393-7

Keywords

Navigation