Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stream Flow Forecasting of Poorly Gauged Mountainous Watershed by Least Square Support Vector Machine, Fuzzy Genetic Algorithm and M5 Model Tree Using Climatic Data from Nearby Station

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forecasting stream flow is a very importance issue in water resources planning and management. The ability of three soft computing methods, least square support vector machine (LSSVM), fuzzy genetic algorithm (FGA) and M5 model tree (M5T), in forecasting daily and monthly stream flows of poorly gauged mountainous watershed using nearby hydro-meteorological data is investigated in the current study. In the first application, monthly stream flows of Hunza river are forecasted using local stream flow data of Hunza and precipitation and temperature data of nearby station. LSSVM provides slightly better forecasts than the FGA and M5T models. Stream flow and temperature inputs generally give better forecasts compared to other inputs. In the second application, daily stream flows of Hunza river are forecasted using local stream flow data of Hunza and precipitation and temperature data of nearby station. Better results are obtained from the models comprising only stream flow inputs. In general, a better accuracy is obtained from LSSVM models in relative to the FGA and M5T. The results indicate that the monthly and daily stream flows of Hunza can be accurately forecasted by using only nearby climatic data. In the third application, daily stream flows of Hunza river are forecasted using local stream flow and climatic data and the models’ accuracy is slightly increased in relative to the previous applications. LSSVM generally performs superior to the FGA and M5T in forecasting daily stream flow of Hunza river using local stream flow and climatic inputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed JA, Sarma AK (2005) Genetic algorithm for optimal operating policy of a multipurpose reservoir. Water Resour Manag 19(2):145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altunkaynak A, Özger M, Çakmakci M (2005) Water consumption prediction of Istanbul city by using fuzzy logic approach. Water Resour Manag 19(5):641–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awchi TA (2014) River discharges forecasting in northern Iraq using different ANN techniques. Water Resour Manag 28(3):801–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya B, Solomatine DP (2005) Neural networks and M5 model trees in modelling water level–discharge relationship. Neurocomputing 63:381–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocchiola D, Diolaiuti G, Soncini A, Mihalcea C, D'agata C, Mayer C et al (2011) Prediction of future hydrological regimes in poorly gauged high altitude basins: the case study of the upper Indus, Pakistan. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(7):2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CL, Lo SL, Yu SL (2005) Applying fuzzy theory and genetic algorithm to interpolate precipitation. J Hydrol 314(1-4):92–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CT, Ou CP, Chau KW (2002) Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective rainfall–runoff model calibration. J Hydrol 268(1-4):72–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang XIE, Deshan T (2010) Forecasting irrigation water requirement based on least squares support vector machine [J]. J Anhui Agric Sci 19:128

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal MK (2014) Modeling of sediment yield prediction using M5 model tree algorithm and wavelet regression. Water Resour Manag 28(7):1991–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Sun X, Ma J (2011) Prediction of daily crop reference evapotranspiration (ET0) values through a least-squares support vector machine model. Hydrol Res 42(4):268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang SH, Ham DH, Kim JH (2012) Forecasting performance of LS-SVM for nonlinear hydrological time series. KSCE J Civ Eng 16(5):870–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O (2012) Modeling discharge-suspended sediment relationship using least square support vector machine. J Hydrol 456:110–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O, Parmar KS (2016) Application of least square support vector machine and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in long term prediction of river water pollution. J Hydrol 534:104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kişi Ö, Tombul M (2013) Modeling monthly pan evaporations using fuzzy genetic approach. J Hydrol 477:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Salinas D, Chaos D, Besada-Portas E, López-Orozco JA, de la Cruz JM, Aranda J (2013) Semiphysical modelling of the nonlinear dynamics of a surface craft with LS-SVM. Math Probl Eng 2013

  • Muhammetoglu A, Yardimci A (2006) A fuzzy logic approach to assess groundwater pollution levels below agricultural fields. Environ Monit Assess 118(1-3):337–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller KR, Mika S, Ratsch G, Tsuda K, Scholkopf B (2001) An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 12(2):181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal M (2006) M5 model tree for land cover classification. Int J Remote Sens 27(4):825–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin LT, Liu SS, Liu HL, Zhang YH (2010) Support vector regression and least squares support vector regression for hormetic dose–response curves fitting. Chemosphere 78(3):327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan JR (1992) Learning with continuous classes. In 5th Australian joint conference on artificial intelligence. Vol 92, pp 343–348

  • Rahimikhoob A (2014) Comparison between M5 model tree and neural networks for estimating reference evapotranspiration in an arid environment. Water Resour Manag 28(3):657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Dugas WA, Srinivasan R, Hauck LM (2001) Validation of the swat model on a large rwer basin with point and nonpoint sources. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(5):1169–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattari MT, Pal M, Apaydin H, Ozturk F (2013) M5 model tree application in daily river flow forecasting in Sohu stream, Turkey. Water Res 40(3):233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şen Z (1998) Fuzzy algorithm for estimation of solar irradiation from sunshine duration. Sol Energy 63(1):39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şen Z, Altunkaynak A (2004) Fuzzy awakening in rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrol Res 35(1):31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KK, Pal M, Singh VP (2010) Estimation of mean annual flood in Indian catchments using backpropagation neural network and M5 model tree. Water Resour Manag 24(10):2007–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Štravs L, Brilly M (2007) Development of a low-flow forecasting model using the M5 machine learning method. Hydrol Sci J 52(3):466–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suykens JA, Vandewalle J (1999) Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9(3):293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang QJ (1991) The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour Res 27(9):2467–2471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu SM, Huang GH, Guo HC (1997) An interactive inexact-fuzzy approach for multiobjective planning of water resource systems. Water Sci Technol 36(5):235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu PS, Yang TC (2000) Fuzzy multi-objective function for rainfall-runoff model calibration. J Hydrol 238(1-2):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Information and control. Fuzzy Sets 8(3):338–353

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the WAPDA for providing the stream flow and meteorological data. Conflict of Interest - None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozgur Kisi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adnan, R.M., Yuan, X., Kisi, O. et al. Stream Flow Forecasting of Poorly Gauged Mountainous Watershed by Least Square Support Vector Machine, Fuzzy Genetic Algorithm and M5 Model Tree Using Climatic Data from Nearby Station. Water Resour Manage 32, 4469–4486 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2033-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2033-2

Keywords

Navigation