Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of hydraulic structures alternatives using promethee II complete ranking method

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydraulic structures have a direct, strong and long-lasting impact on the economy and society in general. Providing the proper structural solution implies finding a balance between economic, environmental and social requirements while decisions taken are associated with serious and irreversible consequences. Optimization techniques play a key role in finding the right solution. In this paper, for a selected stretch of a river, PROMETHEE complete ranking method was employed for selecting the appropriate solution for river training works. This study goal is to determine the level of agreement and to test the sensitivity of the results obtained by two techniques ELECTRE simplified and PROMETHEE method - subjective and objective approach to determining the criterion weight. Findings confirm the justification of implementing both optimization techniques, particularly in the pre-feasibility studies. These techniques still have important implementation and development possibilities, although they have not yet been largely accepted by the engineering community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Taleb MF, Mareschal B (1995) Water resources planning in the Middle East: application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method. Eur J Oper Res 81:500–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoko GA, Singh K, Balerea S, Kokot S (2007) Exploratory multivariate modeling and prediction of the physico-chemical properties of surface water and groundwater. J Hydrol 336:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behzadian M, Kazemzadeh RB, Albadvi A, Aghdasi M (2010) PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and application. Eur J Oper Res 200(1):198–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Mareschal B (1994a) The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid. Decis Support Syst 12:297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Mareschal B (1994b) The PROMETHEE GAIA decision support system for multicriteria investigations. Investigation Operativa 4(2):107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Vincke PH (1985) A preference ranking organization method. The PROMETHEE method for MCDM, Management Science 31:641–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou TY, Lin WT, Lin CY, Chou WC (2007) Application of fuzzy theory and PROMETHEE technique to evaluate suitable ecotechnology method: A case study in Shihmen Reservoir Watershed. Taiwan, Ecological Engineering 31:269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the CRITIC method. Comput Oper Res 22:763–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermatita SH, Retantyo W, Agus H (2011) Electre Methods in Solving Group Decision Support System Bioinformatics on Gene Mutation Detection Simulation. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology 3(1):40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flug M, Seitz HL (2000) Multicriteria decision analysis applied to Glen Canyon Dam. J Water Resour Plan Manag 126(5):270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Higgins A (2008) A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur J Oper Res 184(1):255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans CM, Erickson JD, Noordewier T, Sheldon A, Kline M (2007) Collaborative environmental planning in river management: An application of multicriteria decision analysis in the White River Watershed in Vermont. J Environ Manag 84:534–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostmann M (2005). Decision Support for River Rehabilitation. PhD Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich

  • Hyde KM, Maier HR, Colby CB (2005) Reliability-based approach to multicriteria decision analysis for water resources. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130(6):429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joubert A, Stewart TJ, Eberhard R (2003) Evaluation of water supply augmentation and water demand management options for the City of Cape Town. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 12(1):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khelifi O, Lodolo A, Vranes S, Centi G, Miertus S (2006) A web-based decision support tool for groundwater remediation technologies selection. J Hydroinf 8:91–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Macharis C, Springael J, De Brucker K, Verbeke A (2004) PROMETHEE and AHP: The design oh operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. Eur J Oper Res 153(2):307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud MR, Garcia LA (2000) Comparison of different multicriteria evaluation methods for the Red Bluff diversion dam. Environ Model Softw 15:471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markovic M (2012) Multi criteria Analysis of Hydraulic Structures for River Training Works. Water Resour Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0110-5

  • Nikolic DJ, Jovanovic I, Mihajlovic I, Zivkovic Z (2009) Multi-criteria ranking of copper concentrates according to their quality – An element of environmental management in the vicinity of copper –Smelting complex in Bor, Serbia. J Environ Manag 91:509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2007) Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res 178:514–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkovic S (2002) Savremeni pristup uređenju vodotoka. Vodoprivreda 2001(1-6):189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju KS, Duckstein L, Aronde C (2000) Multicriterion Analysis for Sustainable Water Resources Planning: A Case Study in Spain. Water Resour Manag 14:435–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju KS, Kumar DN (1999) Multicriterion decision making in irrigation planning. Agric Syst 62:117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju KS, Kumar DN (2006) Ranking Irrigation Planning Alternatives Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Water Resour Manag 20:553–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozbahani A, Zahraie B, Tabesh M (2012) PROMETHEE with Precedence Order in the Criteria (PPOC) as a New Group Decision Making Aid: An Application in Urban Water Supply Management. Water Resour Manag 26:3581–3599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousis K, Moustakas K, Malamis S, Papadopoulos A, Loizidou M (2008) Multi-criteria analysis for the determination of the best WEEE management scenario in Cyprus. Waste Manag 28(10):1941–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon U, Bruggemann R, Pudenz S (2004) Aspects of decision support in water management-example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) I - spatially differentiated evaluation. Water Res 38:1809–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subagadis YH, Schütze N, Grundmann J (2016) A Fuzzy-Stochastic Modeling Approach for Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis of Coupled Groundwater-Agricultural Systems. Water Resour Manag 30:2075–2095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny M (1982) Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhi-hong Z, Yi Y, Jing-nan S (2006) Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. J Environ Sci 18(5):1020–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors also feel indebted to the company Visual Decision Inc. Montreal, Canada; for software package Decision Lab 2000 provided to them free of charge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milica Markovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Markovic Brankovic, J., Markovic, M. & Nikolic, D. Comparative study of hydraulic structures alternatives using promethee II complete ranking method. Water Resour Manage 32, 3457–3471 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2001-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2001-x

Keywords

Navigation