Future projections of climate variables are the key for the development of mitigation and adaptation strategy to changing climate. However, such projections are often subjected to large uncertainties which make implementation of climate change strategies on water resources system a challenging job. Major uncertainty sources are General Circulation models (GCMs), post-processing and climate heterogeneity based on catchment characteristics (e.g. scares data and high-altitude). Here we presents the comparisons between different GCMs, statistical downscaling and bias correction approaches and finally climate projections, with the integration of gridded and converted (monthly to daily) data for a high-altitude, scarcely-gauged Jhelum River basin, Pakistan. Current study relies on climate projections obtained from factorial combination of 5-GCMs, 2 statistical downscaling and 2 bias correction methods. In addition, we applied bias corrected APHRODITE, converted daily data using MODAWEC model and observed data. Further, five GCMs (CGCM3, HadCM3, CCSM3, ECHAM5 and CSIRO-MK3.5) were tested to scrutinize two suitable GCMs integrated with Statistical Downscaling Model (SDSM) and Smooth Support Vector Machine (SSVM). Results illustrate that the CGCM3 and HadCM3 were suitable GCMs for selected study basin. Both downscaling techniques are able to simulate precipitation, however, SSVM performed slightly better than SDSM. We found that the integration of CGCM3 with SSVM (SSVM-CGCM3) generates precipitation and temperature better than the CGCM3 (SDSM-CGCM3) and HadCM3 (SDSM-HadCM3) with SDSM. Furthermore, the low elevation stations were influenced by monsoon, significantly prone to rise in precipitation and temperature, while high-altitude stations were influenced by westerlies circulations, less prone to climate change. The projections indicated rise in basin-wide annual precipitation by 25.51, 36.76 and 45.52 mm and temperature by 0.64, 1.47 and 2.79 °C, during 2030s, 2060s and 2090s, respectively. The methods and results of this study can be adopted to evaluate climate change implications in the catchments of characteristics similar to Jhelum River basin.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors would like to special thanks Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for providing financial support under National Research Program for Universities (NRPU) (grant number NRPU#6003) and Start-up Research Grant Program (SRGP) (grant number: SRGP #1239).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Addor N, Rössler O, Köplin N, Huss M, Weingartner R, Seibert J (2014) Robust changes and sources of uncertainty in the projected hydrological regimes of Swiss catchments. Water Resour Res 50:7541–7562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemann S, Chen C, Clark DB, Folwell S, Gosling SN, Haddeland I, Hanasaki N, Heinke J, Ludwig F, Voss F, Wiltshire AJ (2013) Climate change impact on available water resources obtained using multiple global climate and hydrology models. Earth Syst Dynam 4:129–144. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-129-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang J, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Xu C, Wang B, Yao J (2011) Estimation of future precipitation change in the Yangtze River basin by using statistical downscaling method. Stoch Env Res Risk A 25:781–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar R, Singh S, Kumar R, Singh A, Bhardwaj A, Sam L, Randhawa SS, Gupta A (2016) Development of a Glacio-hydrological model for discharge and mass balance reconstruction. Water Resour Manag 30:3475–3492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najafi R, Kermani MRH (2017) Uncertainty modeling of statistical downscaling to assess climate change impacts on temperature and precipitation. Water Resour Manag 31:1843–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson CW (1981) Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation. Water Resour Res 17:182–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teutschbein C, Seibert J (2012) Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: review and evaluation of different methods. J Hydrol 456:12–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vapnik VN (1998) Statistical learning theory vol 1. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Wang X, Huang G, Lin Q, Nie X, Cheng G, Fan Y, Li Z, Yao Y, Suo M (2013) A stepwise cluster analysis approach for downscaled climate projection–a Canadian case study. Environ Model Softw 49:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilby RL, Dawson CW (2013) The statistical downscaling model: insights from one decade of application. Int J Climatol 33:1707–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar