Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 32, Issue 9, pp 2919–2936 | Cite as

Losses in Water Distribution Systems: A Complexity Theory Perspective

  • Bárbara Brzezinski Azevedo
  • Tarcísio Abreu Saurin
Article

Abstract

Water Distribution Systems (WDSs) have losses, which are difficult to be eliminated due to the complex socio-technical nature of these systems. This paper presents a systematic review of the literature on losses in WDSs, which addresses two questions: which are the factors that influence the complexity of WDSs, having an impact on the losses of water? How do the methods used to control losses in WDSs account for complexity? We assumed that to be compatible with the nature of WDSs, the loss control methods should account for five attributes of complexity. Twenty-one factors that influence these attributes were identified from 49 selected papers, based on a content analysis. Non-linear interactions were the attribute most frequently accounted by the methods (36.5%), and none of the methods simultaneously accounted for all the five attributes. The review also supported the development of a model of the relationships between the factors that influence the complexity attributes. This model is a basis for the analysis of the impacts of actions for tackling losses.

Keywords

Water distribution systems Losses Complex socio-technical systems 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11269_2018_1976_MOESM1_ESM.docx (62 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 62 kb)

References

  1. Abadia R, Rocamora C, Vera J (2012) Energy efficiency in irrigation distribution networks II: application. Biosyst Eng 111:398–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkasseh JMA, Adlan MN, Abustan I (2013) Applying minimum night flow to estimate water loss using statistical modeling : a case study in Kinta Valley. Water Resources Management 27:1439–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bengtsson M (2016) NursingPlus open how to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open 2:8–14. Available at.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Britton TC, Stewart RA, O’Halloran KR (2013) Smart metering: enabler for rapid and effective post meter leakage identification and water loss management. J Clean Prod 54:166–176. Available at:.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheong LC (2003) Unaccounted for water and the economics of leak detection. In Water supply. pp. 2–7Google Scholar
  6. Cilliers P (2002) Why we cannot know complex things completely. Emergence 4:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clegg C (2000) Socio-technical principles for system design. Appl Ergon 31:463–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Covelli C, Cozzolino L, Cimorelli L, Della Morte R, Pianese D (2016) Optimal location and setting of PRVs in WDS for leakage minimization. Water Resour Manag 30:1803–1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dekker S (2003). Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: contrasting models on procedures and safety. 34, pp. 233–238Google Scholar
  10. Dekker S, Bergström J, Amer-Wåhlin I, Cilliers P (2012) Complicated, complex, and compliant: best practice in obstetrics. Cogn Tech Work 15:189–195.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0211-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dey S, Lee S (2017) Reassure: requirements elicitation for adaptive socio-technical systems using repertory grid R. Inf Softw Technol 87:160–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dube E, Van Der Zaag P (2003) Analysing water use patterns for demand management : the case of the city of Masvingo, Zimbabwe. Phys Chem Earth 28:805–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farley M (2001). Leakage management and control. A best practice training manual. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/WHO_SDE_WSH_01.1_pp1-98.pdf
  14. Gomes R, Marques ASA, Sousa J (2013) District metered areas design under different decision makers ’ options : cost analysis. Water Resour Manag 27:4527–4543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grimmeisen F, Zemann M, Goeppert N, Goldscheider N (2016) Weekly variations of discharge and groundwater quality caused by intermittent water supply in an urbanized karst catchment. J Hydrol 537:157–170 Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169416301500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heracleous C, Kolios P, Panayiotou CG, Ellinas G, Polycarpou MM (2017) Hybrid systems modeling for critical infrastructures interdependency. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 165(March):89–101. Available at.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herrera M, Abraham E, Stoianov I (2016) A graph-theoretic framework for assessing the resilience of Sectorised water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 30:1685–1699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunaidi O, Chu W, Wang A (2000) Detecting leaks. American Water Works Association 92(2):82–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kanakoudis V, Muhammetoglu H, Network WD (2014) Review urban water pipe networks management towards non-revenue water reduction : two case studies from Greece and Turkey. Clean Soil Air Water 42(1):880–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim Y, Je S et al (2016) Robust leak detection and its localization using interval estimation for water distribution network. Computers and Chemical Engineering 92:1–17. Available at.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.04.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu J, Yu G (2014) Analysis of demand and leakage distributing uniformly along pipes. Procedia Engineering 89:603–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malm A, Moberg F, Rosén L, Pettersson TJR (2015) Cost-benefit analysis and uncertainty analysis of water loss reduction measures: case study of the Gothenburg drinking water distribution system. Water Resour Manag 29(15):5451–5468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moher D et al (2009) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annulas of Intern Med 151(4):264–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mutikanga HE, Sharma SK, Vairavamoorthy K (2011) Assessment of apparent losses in urban water systems. Water and Environment Journal 25:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicolini M, Patriarca A, A APS (2011). Model calibration and system simulation from real time monitoring of water distribution networks. IEEE, (978–1–61284–840–2/11/$2600 ©2011 IEEE), pp. 2–6Google Scholar
  26. Perrow C (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High-risk Technologies P. U. Press, ed., Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Prieto MA et al (2015) Mathematical model as a standard procedure to analyze small and large water distribution networks. Journal of Cleaner Production 106:541–554. Available at.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramasesh RV, Browning TR (2014) A conceptual framework for tackling knowable unknown unknowns in project management. Journal of Operations Management 32(4):190–204. Available at.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ríos JC, Santos-Tellez RU, Rodríguez PH, Leyva EA, Martínez VN (2014) Methodology for the identification of apparent losses in water distribution networks. Procedia Engineering 70:238–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saurin TA, Rooke J, Koskela L (2013) A complex systems theory perspective of lean production. Int J Prod Res 51(19):5824–5838 Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207543.2013.796420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith K, Liu S, Chang T (2015) Contribution of urban water supply to greenhouse gas emissions in China. Research and Analysis 20(4)Google Scholar
  32. Starczewska D, Collins R, Boxall J (2015) Occurrence of Transients in Water Distribution Networks. Procedia. Engineering 119:1473–1482 Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877705816000023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tanyimboh TT, Seyoum AG (2016) Multiobjective evolutionary optimization of water distribution systems: Exploiting diversity with infeasible solutions. Journal of Environmental Management 183:133–141. Available at.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thissen W, Kwakkel J, Mens M (2017) Dealing with uncertainties in fresh water supply: experiences in the Netherlands. Water Resour Manag 31:703–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trist EL, Bamforth KW (1951) Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method of coal-getting: an examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Human relations 4(1):3–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trojan F, Morais DC (2015) Maintenance management decision model for reduction of losses in water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 29:3459–3479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xin K, Tao T, Lu Y, Xiong X (2014) Apparent losses analysis in district metered areas of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 28:683–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu Q et al (2013) Optimal pipe replacement strategy based on break rate prediction through genetic programming for water distribution network. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research 7(2):134–140. Available at.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2013.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yuksel E, Eroglu V, Sarikaya HZ, Koyuncu I (2004) Current and future strategies for water and wastewater Management of Istanbul City. Environ Manag 33(2):186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zyoud SH, Kaufmann LG, Shaheen H, Samhan S, Fuchs-Hanusch D (2016) A framework for water loss management in developing countries under fuzzy environment: integration of fuzzy AHP with fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl 61:86–105 Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417416302342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations