Introducing Biological Indicators into CCME WQI Using Variable Fuzzy Set Method

  • Yan Feng
  • Qian Bao
  • Liu Chenglin
  • Wei Bowen
  • You Zhang
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The biological indicators are rarely used in CCME WQI, for the objective thresholds of most biological indicators are ambiguous. To solve this problem, this study establishes an improved CCME WQI model based on variable fuzzy set theory. The water quality of Wuli Lake is assessed as an illustration; and the result shows that its water quality condition is “fair”, and more measures should be adopted to control the internal phosphorus releasing and the reproduction of cyanobacteria in summer and autumn. Moreover, compared with the conventional CCME CQI, the improved CCME WQI is more comprehensive, for it not only takes the aquatic physic-chemical condition into consideration, but also introduces the biological indicators into evaluation.

Key Words

CCME WQI Biological indicators Variable fuzzy set Wuli Lake 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the contract No. 51409139 and No. 51709142, and Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under the contract No. 2017CFB312, and the Natural Science Foundation of Water Resources Department of Hunan Government under the contract No. 201723041.

References

  1. Cai LL, Zhu GW, Wang YP, Gao G, Qian BQ (2011) Influences of comprehensive treatment on water quality in Wuli Bay of Taihu Lake. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences) 39(5):482–488Google Scholar
  2. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2001a) Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: CCME water quality index 1.0. Technical report. In: Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 1999. WinnipegGoogle Scholar
  3. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2001b) Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: CCME water quality index 1.0. User's manual. In: Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 1999. WinnipegGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen SY (1998) Engineering fuzzy set theory and application. Natl Def Ind Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Chinese Environmental Protection Agency (2002a) National surface water environmental quality standards of China (GB3838-2002). China Standards Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Chinese Environmental Protection Agency (2002b) Water and exhausted water monitoring analysis method. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Douterelo I, Perona E, Mateo P (2004) Use of cyanobacteria to assess water quality in running waters. Environmental Pollution 127(3):377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferreira NC, Bonetti C, Seiffert WQ (2011) Hydrological and water quality indices as management tools in marine shrimp culture. Aquaculture 318(3):425–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hu HJ (2011) The biology of Water-blooms Blue-green Algae. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Mohebbi MR, Saeedi R, Montazeri A (2013) Assessment of water quality in groundwater resources of Iran using a modified drinking water quality index (DWQI). Ecological Indicators 30(30):28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. National Development and Reform Commission of China (2013) General plan for comprehensive treatment of the water environment in Taihu Basin. http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/201401/t20140114_575695.html
  12. Nikoo MR, Kerachian R, Malakpour-Estalaki S, Bashi-Azghadi SN, Azimi-Ghadikolaee MM (2011) A probabilistic water quality index for river water quality assessment: a case study. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment 181:465–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Passy SI, Bode RW (2004) Diatom model affinity (dma), a new index for water quality assessment. Hydrobiologia 524(1):241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ruley JE, Rusch KA (2002) An assessment of long-term post-restoration water quality trends in a shallow, subtropical, urban hypereutrophic lake. Ecological Engineering 19(4):265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Semiromi BF, Hassani AH, Torabian A, Karbassi AR, Lotfi HF (2011) Water quality index development using fuzzy logic: a case study of the Karoon river of Iran. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(50):10125–10133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Steven KE, Robert LN, Victor FM (2002) Use of macroinvertebrate and chemical indices to assess water quality of an irrigation wasteway. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 17(2):191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Terrado M, Borrell E, Campos S (2010) Surface-water-quality indices for the analysis of data generated by automated sampling networks. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 29(1):40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. The Environment Protection Bureau of Wuxi City (2012) The warning plan of water quality in 2012. http://www.wxbh.gov.cn/bhhb/a/201211/article_c4yourf7x119.shtml
  19. The Management Committee of Taihu Lake Basin (2012) The health status report of Taihu Lake. http://www.tba.gov.cn/tba/content/TBA/lygb/index.html
  20. Tyagi S, Sharma B, Singh P (2013) Water quality assessment in terms of water quality index. American Journal of Water Resources 1(3):34–38Google Scholar
  21. Vadiati M, Nakhaei M, Amiri AV, Mirarabi A (2013) An assessment of the Karoon river's water quality using the fuzzy inference model. Journal of Water Engineering 6(18):39–48Google Scholar
  22. Wan XY, Zhong PA, Emmanuel K (2014) Variable sets and fuzzy rating interval for water allocation options assessment. Water Resources Management 28:2833–2849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang XJ, Zhao RH, Hao YW (2011) Flood control operations based on the theory of variable fuzzy sets. Water Resources Management 25:777–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang YK, Sheng D, Wang D (2014) Variable fuzzy set theory to assess water quality of the Meiliang Bay in Taihu Lake basin. Water Resources Management 28:867–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yan F, Liu L, Zhang Y, Chen MS, Chen N (2016a) The research of dynamic variable fuzzy set assessment model in water quality evaluation. Water Resources Management 30(1):63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yan F, Qiao DY, Qian B, Ma L, Xing XG, Zhang Y, Wang XG (2016b) Improvement of ccme wqi using grey relational method. Journal of Hydrology 543:316–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ye C, Li CH, Yu HC, Song XF, Zou GY, Liu J (2011) Study on ecological restoration in near-shore zone of a eutrophic lake, wuli bay, taihu lake. Ecological Engineering 37(9):1434–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang H, Zhang J, Zhu Y (2009) Identification of microcystins in waters used for daily life by people who live on Tai Lake during a serious cyanobacteria dominated bloom with risk analysis to human health. Environmental Toxicology 24(1):82–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yan Feng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qian Bao
    • 3
  • Liu Chenglin
    • 1
  • Wei Bowen
    • 1
  • You Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureNanchang UniversityNanchangChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina
  3. 3.Hydrology Bureau of Changjiang Water Resources CommissionWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations