Abstract
The study investigates accuracy of a new modeling scheme, subset adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (subset ANFIS), in estimating the daily reference evapotranspiration (ET0). Daily weather data of relative humidity, solar radiation, air temperature, and wind speed from three stations in Central Anatolian Region of Turkey were utilized as input to the applied models. The input data set for modeling the ET0 was divided to several subsets to calibrate the local data using a local modeling-based ANFIS. The estimates obtained from subset ANFIS models were compared with those of the M5 model tree (M5Tree), ANFIS models and ANN. Mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and model efficiency factor criteria were applied for analysis of models. The accuracy of M5Tree (from 15.3% to 32.5% in RMSE, from 14.4% to 24.2% in MAE), ANN (from 24.3% to 65.3% in RMSE, from 34.1% to 47% in MAE) and ANFIS (from 17.4% to 35.4% in RMSE, from 10.8% to 28.3% in MAE) models was significantly increased using subset ANFIS for estimating da ily ET0.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah SS, Malek MA (2016) Empirical Penman-Monteith equation and artificial intelligence techniques in predicting reference evapotranspiration: a review. Int J Water 10(1):55–66. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJW.2016.073741
Abdulshahed AM, Longstaff AP, Fletcher S, Myers A (2015) Thermal error modelling of machine tools based on ANFIS with fuzzy c-means clustering using a thermal imaging camera. Appl Math Model 39(7):1837–1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.016
Aghajanloo M-B, Sabziparvar A-A, Talaee PH (2013) Artificial neural network–genetic algorithm for estimation of crop evapotranspiration in a semi-arid region of Iran. Neural Comput & Applic 23(5):1387–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1087-y
Akkemik Ü, Aras A (2005) Reconstruction (1689–1994 AD) of April–August precipitation in the southern part of central Turkey. Int J Climatol 25(4):537–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1145
Cigizoglu HK, Kisi Ö (2006) Methods to improve the neural network performance in suspended sediment estimation. J Hydrol 317(3-4):221–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.019
Citakoglu H, Cobaner M, Haktanir T, Kisi O (2014) Estimation of monthly mean reference evapotranspiration in Turkey. Water Resour Manag 28(1):99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0474-1
Cobaner M (2011) Evapotranspiration estimation by two different neuro-fuzzy inference systems. J Hydrol 398(3-4):292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.030
Dogan E (2009) Reference evapotranspiration estimation using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Irrig Drain 58(5):617–628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ird.445
Esfahanipour A, Aghamiri W (2010) Adapted neuro-fuzzy inference system on indirect approach TSK fuzzy rule base for stock market analysis. Expert Syst Appl 37(7):4742–4748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.020
Etemad-Shahidi A, Mahjoobi J (2009) Comparison between M5′ model tree and neural networks for prediction of significant wave height in Lake Superior. Ocean Eng 36(15-16):1175–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.08.008
Etemad-Shahidi A, Taghipour M (2012) Predicting longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams using M5′ model tree. J Hydraul Eng 138(6):542–554. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000550
Gardner MW, Dorling S (1998) Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmos Environ 32(14-15):2627–2636. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00447-0
Graupe D (2013) Principles of artificial neural networks, vol 7, 3rd edn. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte, Lte., Singapore, p 506224
Guven A, Aytek A, Yuce MI, Aksoy H (2008) Genetic programming-based empirical model for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation. Clean–Soil, Air, Water 36(10-11):905–912. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.200800009
Kahya E, Çağatay Karabörk M (2001) The analysis of El Nino and La Nina signals in streamflows of Turkey. Int J Climatol 21(10):1231–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.663
Keshtegar B, Allawi MF, Afan HA, El-Shafie A (2016a) Optimized river stream-flow forecasting model utilizing high-order response surface method. Water Resour Manag 30(11):3899–3914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1397-4
Keshtegar B, Piri J, Kisi O (2016b) A nonlinear mathematical modeling of daily pan evaporation based on conjugate gradient method. Comput Electron Agric 127:120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.05.018
Keshtegar B, Sadeghian P, Gholampour A, Ozbakkaloglu T (2017) Nonlinear modeling of ultimate strength and strain of FRP-confined concrete using chaos control method. Compos Struct 163:423–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.023
Kisi O (2008) The potential of different ANN techniques in evapotranspiration modelling. Hydrol Process 22(14):2449–2460. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6837
Kisi O (2016) Modeling reference evapotranspiration using three different heuristic regression approaches. Agric Water Manag 169:162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.02.026
Kisi O, Zounemat-Kermani M (2014) Comparison of two different adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems in modelling daily reference evapotranspiration. Water Resour Manag 28(9):2655–2675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0632-0
Kumar M, Raghuwanshi N, Singh R, Wallender W, Pruitt W (2002) Estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural network. J Irrig Drain Eng 128(4):224–233. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2002)128:4(224)
Kumar M, Bandyopadhyay A, Raghuwanshi N, Singh R (2008) Comparative study of conventional and artificial neural network-based ETo estimation models. Irrig Sci 26(6):531–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0114-3
Landeras G, Ortiz-Barredo A, López JJ (2008) Comparison of artificial neural network models and empirical and semi-empirical equations for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation in the Basque Country (Northern Spain). Agric Water Manag 95(5):553–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.12.011
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
Pal M, Deswal S (2009) M5 model tree based modelling of reference evapotranspiration. Hydrol Process 23(10):1437–1443. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7266
Petković D, Gocic M, Trajkovic S, Shamshirband S, Motamedi S, Hashim R, Bonakdari H (2015) Determination of the most influential weather parameters on reference evapotranspiration by adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology. Comput Electron Agric 114:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.04.012
Pour-Ali Baba A, Shiri J, Kisi O, Fard AF, Kim S, Amini R (2013) Estimating daily reference evapotranspiration using available and estimated climatic data by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and artificial neural network (ANN). Hydrol Res 44(1):131–146. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2012.074
Rahimikhoob A (2014) Comparison between M5 model tree and neural networks for estimating reference evapotranspiration in an arid environment. Water Resour Manag 28(3):657–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0506-x
Rahimikhoob A (2016) Comparison of M5 model tree and artificial neural network’s methodologies in modelling daily reference evapotranspiration from NOAA satellite images. Water Resour Manag 30(9):3063–3075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1331-9
Solomatine DP, Xue Y (2004) M5 model trees and neural networks: application to flood forecasting in the upper reach of the Huai River in China. J Hydrol Eng 9(6):491–501. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:6(491)
Traore S, Luo Y, Fipps G (2016) Deployment of artificial neural network for short-term forecasting of evapotranspiration using public weather forecast restricted messages. Agric Water Manag 163:363–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.009
Wen X, Si J, He Z, Wu J, Shao H, Yu H (2015) Support-vector-machine-based models for modeling daily reference evapotranspiration with limited climatic data in extreme arid regions. Water Resour Manag 29(9):3195–3209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0990-2
Willmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Phys Geogr 2:184–194
Yin Z, Wen X, Feng Q, He Z, Zou S, Yang L (2017) Integrating genetic algorithm and support vector machine for modeling daily reference evapotranspiration in a semi-arid mountain area. Hydrol Res 48(5):1177–1191. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.205
Zanetti S, Sousa E, Oliveira V, Almeida F, Bernardo S (2007) Estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural network and minimum climatological data. J Irrig Drain Eng 133(2):83–89. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:2(83)
Zounemat-Kermani M (2012) Hourly predictive Levenberg–Marquardt ANN and multi linear regression models for predicting of dew point temperature. Meteorog Atmos Phys 117(3-4):181–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-012-0192-x
Zounemat-Kermani M, Teshnehlab M (2008) Using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for hydrological time series prediction. Appl Soft Comput 8(2):928–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2007.07.011
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by University of Zabol under Grant No. UOZ-GR-9517-3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keshtegar, B., Kisi, O., Ghohani Arab, H. et al. Subset Modeling Basis ANFIS for Prediction of the Reference Evapotranspiration. Water Resour Manage 32, 1101–1116 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1857-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1857-5