Skip to main content
Log in

Estimate of Suspended Sediment Concentration from Monitored Data of Turbidity and Water Level Using Artificial Neural Networks

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are promising alternatives for the estimation of suspended sediment concentration (SSC), but they are dependent on the availability data. This study investigates the use of an ANN model for forecasting SSC using turbidity and water level. It is used an original method, idealized to investigate the minimum complexity of the ANN that does not present, in relation to more complex networks, loss of efficiency when applied to other samples, and to perform its training avoiding the overfitting even when data availability is insufficient to use the cross-validation technique. The use of a validation procedure by resampling, the control of overfitting through a previously researched condition of training completion, as well as training repetitions to provide robustness are important aspects of the method. Turbidity and water level data, related to 59 SSC values, collected between June 2013 and October 2015, were used. The development of the proposed ANN was preceded by the training of an ANN, without the use of the new resources, which clearly showed the overfitting occurrence when resources were not used to avoid it, with Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NS) equals to 0.995 in the training and NS = 0.788 in the verification. The proposed method generated efficient models (NS = 0.953 for verification), with well distributed errors and with great capacity of generalization for future applications. The final obtained model enabled the SSC calculation, from water level and turbidity data, even when few samples were available for the training and verification procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abudu S, Cui C-l, King JP, Abudukadeer K (2010) Comparison of performance of statistical models in forecasting monthly streamflow of Kizil River, China. Water Sci Eng 3(3):269–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh MJ, Shahheydari H, Kavianpour MR, Shamloo H, Barati R (2017) Prediction of longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural rivers using a cluster-based Bayesian network. Environ Earth Sci 76(2):86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afan HA, El-Shafie A, Yaseen ZM, Hameed MM, Mohtar WHMW, Hussain A (2015) ANN based sediment prediction model utilizing different input scenarios. Water Resour Manag 29:1231–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE-Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts. J Hydrol Eng 5(2):115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barati R, Neyshabouri SS, Ahmadi G (2014) Development of empirical models with high accuracy for estimation of drag coefficient of flow around a smooth sphere: an evolutionary approach. Powder Technol 257:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayram A, Kankal M, Önsoy H (2012) Estimation of suspended sediment concentration from turbidity measurements using artificial neural networks. Environ Monit Assess 184:4355–4365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayram A, Kankal M, Tayfur G, Önsoy H (2014) Prediction of suspended sediment concentration from water quality variables. Neural Comput & Applic 24:1079–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura. Departamento Nacional de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Divisão de Pesquisa Pedológica (1973) Levantamento de reconhecimento dos solos do estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Boletim Técnico. Recife: convênio MA/DPP – SA/ DRNR

  • Buyukyildiz M, Kumcu SY (2017) An estimation of the suspended sediment load using adaptive network based fuzzy inference system, support vector machine and artificial neural network Models. Water Resour Res 31(4):1343–1359

  • Castro NMR, Auzet A-V, Chevallie P, LEprun J-C (1999) Land use change efects on runof and erosion from plot to catchment scale on the basaltic plateau of southern Brazil. Hydrol Process 13(11):1621–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards TK, Glysson GD (1999) Field methods for measurement of fluvial sediment. Techniques of water-resources investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey. In: Book 3 (applications of hydraulics). Chapter C2. USGS, Virgínia

    Google Scholar 

  • FTS - Forest Technology System (2013) DTS-12 SDI turbidity sensor: user manual. 700-DTS-12-Rev

  • Garg V (2015) Inductive group method of data handling neural network approach to model basin sediment yield. J Hydrol Eng 20:C6014002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao P, Josefson M (2012) Temporal variations of suspended sediment transport in Oneida Creek watershed, central New York. J Hydrol 426-427:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimann M, Liedermann M, Lalk P, Habersack H (2014) An integrated suspended sediment transport monitoring and analysis concept. Int J Sediment Res 29(2):135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington ST, Harrington JR (2013) An assessment of the suspended sediment rating curve approach for load estimation on the rivers Bandon and Owenabue, Ireland. Geomorphology 185:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J, Valeo C, Chu A, Neumann N (2011) Prediction of event-based stormwater runoff quantity and quality by ANNs developed using PMI-based input selection. J Hydrol 400:10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht-Nielsen R (1990) Neurocomputing. Addison - Wesely Publishing Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal Approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini K, Nodoushan EJ, Barati R, Shahheydari H (2016) Optimal design of labyrinth spillways using meta-heuristic algorithms. KSCE J Civ Eng 20(1):468–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafdani EK, Nia AM, Ahmadi A (2013) Daily suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. J Hydrol 478:50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefrancois J, Grimaldi C, Gascuel-Odoux C, Gilliet N (2007) Suspended sediment and discharge relationships to identify bank degradation as a main sediment source on small agricultural catchments. Hydrol Process 21(21):2923–2933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo TM, Pedrollo OC (2015) Artificial neural networks for estimating soil water retention curve using fitted and measured data. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2015:16 Article ID 535216

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosavi V, Talebi A, Hadian MR (2017) Development of a hybrid wavelet packet-group method of data handling (WPGMDH) model for runoff forecasting. Water Resour Manag 31(1):43–59

  • Mustafa MR, Rezaur RB, Saiedi S, Isa MH (2012) River suspended sediment prediction using various multilayer perceptron neural network training algorithms - a case study in Malaysia. Water Resour Manag 26:1879–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani V, Kalantari O (2010) Integrated artificial neural network for spatiotemporal modeling of rainfall–runoff–sediment processes. Environ Eng Sci 27(5):411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani V, Kalantari O, Baghanam AH (2012) Two Semidistributed ANN-based models for estimation of suspended sediment load. J Hydrol Eng 17:1368–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani V, Parhizkar M, Vousoughi FD, Amini B (2014) Capability of artificial neural network for detecting hysteresis phenomenon involved in hydrological processes. J Hydrol Eng 19:896–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaee T, Nourani T, Zounemat-Kermani M, Kisi O (2011) River suspended sediment load prediction: application of ANN and Wavelet conjunction model. J Hydrol Eng 16(8):613–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by backpropagating errors. Nature 323:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar A, Kumar R (2012) Artificial neural networks for event based rainfall-runoff modeling. J Water Resour Prot 4:891–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shellenbarger GG, Wright SA, Schoellhamer DH (2013) A sediment budget for the southern reach in San Francisco Bay, CA: implications for habitat restoration. Mar Geol 345:281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP, Frevert DK (2006) Watershed models. CRC Press, United States of America

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Imtiyaz M, Isaac RK, Denis DM (2012) Comparison of soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network for predicting sediment yield in the Nagwa agricultural watershed in Jharkhand, India. Agric Water Manag 104:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Imtiyaz M, Isaac RK, Denis DM (2013) Comparison of artificial neural network models for sediment yield prediction at single Gauging Station of watershed in eastern India. J Hydrol Eng 18:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su C-C, Lu J-Y, Hong J-H (2013) A field investigation of the sediment transport characteristics of a high sediment load intermittent river in Taiwan. Hydrol Process 27:4043–4056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebizadeh M, Seyyed SM, Ayyoubzadeh A, Ghasemzadeh M (2010) Uncertainty analysis in sediment load modeling using ANN and SWAT model. Water Resour Manag 24:1747–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tananaev NI, Debolskiy MV (2014) Turbidity observations in sediment flux studies: examples from Russian rivers in cold environments. Geomorphology 218:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tóth B, Bódis E (2015) Estimation of suspended loads in the Danube River at Göd (1668 river km), Hungary. J Hydrol 523:139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogl TP, Mangis JK, Rigler AK, Zink WT, Alkon DL (1988) Accelerating the convergence of the back-propagation method. Biol Cybern 59:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE (1977) Acessing the acuracy of suspended sediment rating curves for a small basin. Water Resour Res 13(3):531–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West D, Dellana S (2011) An empirical analysis of neural network memory structures for basin water quality forecasting. Int J Forecast 27:777–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani MR, Zolfaghari AA (2017) Monthly River forecasting using instance-based learning methods and climatic parameters. J Hydrol Eng 22(6):04017002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank CNPq for the first author’s doctorate scholarship and for the second author’s research production grant, and FINEP for the allocation of resources for the basin monitoring in the projects “Research Network in Monitoring and Modeling of Hydrosedimentological Processes in Rural and Urban Representative Basins of the Atlantic Forest Biome” and “Assessment of the Sediment Input in Reservoirs Aiming at Increasing Water Availability”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa Sari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sari, V., dos Reis Castro, N.M. & Pedrollo, O.C. Estimate of Suspended Sediment Concentration from Monitored Data of Turbidity and Water Level Using Artificial Neural Networks. Water Resour Manage 31, 4909–4923 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1785-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1785-4

Keywords

Navigation