Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Institutional Dynamics of Stability and Practice Change: The Urban Water Management Sector of Australia (1970–2015)

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even though traditional urban water management practices have been deemed as unsustainable, lacking resilience and ill-equipped to deal with the challenges of the twenty-first century, they continue to dominate urban water management sectors worldwide. This lock-in is rooted in the institutional building blocks of urban water management sectors which represent higher order principles, such as widely shared rules, norms and values that weave around old and new ways of doing. To reveal the institutional foundations of this lock-in and to demonstrate how opportunities for practice change emerge, this paper explores the institutional dynamic of the urban water management sector in Australia with a novel mixed methods and multiple case study approach. The paper identifies six distinct institutional logics, charts their development from 1970 to 2015 and characterises them in their ideal-typical form. The findings demonstrate that logics evolve and co-evolve continuously over time, gradually changing the way they manifest themselves. It is through these processes that stability and practice change as well as wholesale sectoral institutional transformations can be explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Ashworth R, Ferlie E, Hammerschmid G, Moon MJ, Reay T (2013) Theorizing contemporary public management: international and comparative perspectives. Brit J Manage 24:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Productivity Comission (2011) Australia’s urban water sector, vol 55 Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes OM, Kriwoken L (2006) Changing perspectives - changing paradigms: Taking the “soft path” to water sustainability in the Okanagan Basin. Can Water Resour J 3:75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown R, Ashley R, Farrelly M (2011) Political and professional agency entrapment: an agenda for urban water research. Water Resour Manag 25:4037–4050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Statistics Australia (2014) Capital cities: past, present and future. [online] URL: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Previousproducts/3218.0Feature Article22012–13?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=3218.0&issue=2012–13&num=&view=

  • Byrnes J (2013) A short institutional and regulatory history of the Australian urban water sector. Util Policy 24:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colebatch HK (2006) Governing the use of water: the institutional context. Desalination 187:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell J, Plano Clark V, Gutmann M, Hanson W (2003) Advanced mixed methods research design. In: Tahakkori A, Teddlie C (eds) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 209–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Daudigeos T, Boutinot A, Jaumier S (2013) Taking stock of institutional complexity: anchoring a pool of institutional logics into the interinstitutional system with a descendent hierachical analysis. Res Sociol Organ 39:319–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio P, Mullen AL (2000) Enacting community in progressive America: civic rituals in national music week, 1924. Poetics 27:135–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn MB, Jones C (2010) Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: the contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967-2005. Adm Sci Q 55:114–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson B, Brown R, de Haan F, Deletic A (2014) Analysis of institutional work in innovation trajectories in water infrastructure systems of Melbourne, Australia. Environ Innov Soc Transit 15:42–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland R, Alford R (1991) Bringing society back in: symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In: Powell W, DiMaggio P (eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenfschilling L, Truffer B (2014) The structuration of socio-technical regimes - conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Res Policy 43:772–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuenfschilling L, Truffer B (2016) The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems - an analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector. Technol Forecast Soc 103:298–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrick E, Reay T (2011) Constellations of institutional logics: changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work Occup 38:372–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton Q, Daniell K, Nauges C, Rinaudo JD, Wai Wah Chan N (2015) Understanding and managing urban water in transition. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Diaz M, Li SX, Lorente JC (2010) The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ Sci 21:521–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta ER, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad Manag Ann 5:317–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman AJ (1999) Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Acad Manag J 42:351–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C, Livne-Tarandach R, Balachandra L (2010) Rhetoric that wins clients: entrepreneurial firms use of institutional logics when competing for resources. Res Sociol Work 21:183–218

  • Langfield-Smith K (1992) Exploring the need for a shared cognitive map. J Manag Stud 29:349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: competing logics and pratice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad Manag J 50:289–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury M, Boxenbaum E (2013) Institutional logics in action. Res Sociol Organ 39A:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlow DR, Moglia M, Cook S, Beale DJ (2013) Towards sustainable urban water management: a critical reassessment. Water Res 47:7150–7161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83:340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Zbigniew W, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr J (1998) Measuring meaning structures. Annu Rev Sociol 24:345–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigam A, Ocasio W (2010) Event attention, environmental sensemaking and change in institutional logics: an inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organ Sci 21:823–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio W, Loewenstein J, Nigam A (2015) How streams of communication reproduce and change institutional logics: the role of categories. Acad Manag Rev 40:28–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache A, Santos F (2013) Embedded in hybrid contexts: how individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. Res Sociol Organ 39B:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manag 21:49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Jeffrey P, Isendahl N, Brugnach M (2011) Maturing the new water management paradigm: progressing from aspiration to practice. Water Resour Manag 25:837–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Möltgen J (2008) Adaptive and integrated water management: coping with complexity and uncertainty. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips N, Lawrence TB, Hardy C (2004) Discourse and institutions. Acad Manag Rev 29:635–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips N, Malhotra N (2008) Taking social construction seriously: extending the discursive approach in institutional theory. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R (eds) The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell W, Dimaggio P (1991) Introduction. In: Powell W, Dimaggio P (eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in toque Ville: nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Am J Sociol 108:795–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott R (1995) Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott R, Ruef A, Mendel P, Caronna C (2000) Institutional change and healthcare organizations: from professional dominance to managed care. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck W, Thelen K (2005) Introduction: institutional change in advanced capitalist economies. In: Streeck W, Thelen K (eds) Beyond continuity. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby R (2010) Challenges for institutional theory. J Manag Inq 19:14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan J (1997) Using cognitive mapping in management research: decisions about technical innovation. Brit J Manage 8:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton P, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Am J Sociol 105:801–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton P, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The institutional logics perspective - a new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Troy P (ed) (2008) Troubled waters - confronting the water crisis in Australias cities. ANU Press, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Meene SJ, Brown R (2009) Delving into the "institutional black box": revealing the attributes of sustainable urban water management regimes. J Am Water Resour As 45:1448–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gestel N, Hillebrand B (2011) Explaining stability and change: the rise and fall of logics in pluralistic fields. Organ Stud 32:231–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventresca M, Mohr J (2002) Archival research methods. In: Baum J (ed) Companion to organizations. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldorff SB, Reay T, Goodrick E (2013) A tale of two countries: how different constellations of logics impact action. Res Sociol Organ 39:99–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werbeloff L, Brown R (2016) Using policy and regulatory frameworks to facilitate water transitions. Water Resour Manag 30:3653–3669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong T, Brown R (2009) The water sensitive city: principles for practice. Water Sci Technol 60:673–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilber TB (2013) Institutional logics and institutional work: should they be agreed? Res Sociol Organ 39:77–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Commonwealth of Australia through the Cooperative Research Centre Program. We also thank the Australian Research Council for providing support (DP120102791) for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia

    Christoph Brodnik

  2. School of Social Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia

    Christoph Brodnik

  3. Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia

    Rebekah Brown

  4. James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, Australia

    Chris Cocklin

  5. Office of the Senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia

    Chris Cocklin

Authors
  1. Christoph Brodnik
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebekah Brown
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chris Cocklin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Brodnik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brodnik, C., Brown, R. & Cocklin, C. The Institutional Dynamics of Stability and Practice Change: The Urban Water Management Sector of Australia (1970–2015). Water Resour Manage 31, 2299–2314 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1645-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1645-2

Keywords