Abstract
Sustainable water management is crucial in the reduction of water pollution and floods. New techniques should be investigated in order to avoid present and future problems such as flood, drought, and water contamination. For this purpose, Low Impact Development-Best Management Practice (LID-BMP) has recently come into the stage in storm water management. Vegetative swales, green roofs, bioretentions, storm water wetlands, rain barrels, permeable asphalts and pavements are among LID-BMPs. Bioretention type of LID is implemented to diminish adverse effects of urbanization such as flood by reducing peak flows on surface and thus managing storm water runoff. The aim of this study is to investigate the hydrological performance of bioretentions by developing a hydrological model based on the data obtained using experimental setup called Rainfall-Watershed-Bioretention (RWB). The hydrological model of RWB (HM-RWB) consists of two main components: (i) rainfall-runoff model in which kinematic wave theory is used for simulation of surface runoff generated over the drainage area that reaches the bioretention as inflow; (ii) runoff-bioretention flow model in which Green-Ampt method under unsteady rainfall is employed and further improved by incorporating the effect of ponding depth on bioretention for the simulation of outflow at the exit of the bioretention. It is observed that the results of the hydrological model developed herein are in good agreement with the measured data obtained in the RWB experimental setup.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akan AO (2013) Preliminary design aid for bioretention filters. J Hydrol Eng 18(3):318–323
Angelakis AN, Gikas P (2014) Water reuse: overview of current practices and trends in the world with emphasis on EU states. Water Utility Journal 8:67–78
Brander KE, Owen KE, Potter KW (2004) Modeled impacts of development type on runoff volume and infiltration performance. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40(4):961–969
Brown RA, Skaggs RW, Hunt WF (2013) Calibration and validation of DRAINMOD to model bioretention hydrology. J Hydrol 486:430–442
Chin DA (2017) Designing bioretention areas for stormwater management. Environmental Processes 4(1):1–13
Chow V T, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied Hydrology. McGraw- Hill Book Co., New York, p 572
Chu ST (1978) Infiltration during an unsteady rain. Water Resour Res 14(3):461–466
Davis AP, Hunt W, Traver R, Clarn M (2009) Bioretention technology: overview of current practice and future needs. J Environ Eng 135:109–117
Dietz M (2007) Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air Soil Pollut 186:351–363
Eagleson PS (1970) Dynamic hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York
Fletcher TD, Andrieu H, Hamel P (2013) Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: a state of the art. Adv Water Resour 51:261–279
Green WH, Ampt GA (1911) Studies on soil physics, 1, the flow of air and water through soils. J Agric Sci 4(1):1–24
Gülbaz S, Kazezyılmaz-Alhan CM (2014) Investigating effects of low impact development on surface runoff and TSS with a calibrated hydrodynamic model. Houille Blanche-Revue Internationale De L Eau 3:77–84
Gülbaz S, Kazezyılmaz-Alhan CM (2017) Experimental investigation on hydrologic performance of LID with rainfall-watershed-bioretention system. J Hydrol Eng 22(1):D4016003
Gülbaz S, Kazezyılmaz-Alhan CM, Copty NK (2015) Evaluation of heavy metal removal capacity of bioretention systems. Water Air Soil Pollut 226(11):376
Guo JCY, Luu TM (2015) Hydrologic model developed for stormwater ınfiltration practices. J Hydrol Eng 20(9):06015001
Haifeng J, Yuwen L, Shaw LY, Yurong C (2012) Planning of LID–BMPs for urban runoff control: The case of Beijing Olympic Village. Sep Purif Technol 84(SI):112–119
Hatt BE, Steinel A, Deletic A, Fletcher TD (2011) Retention of heavy metals by stormwater filtration systems: breakthrough analysis. Water Sci Technol 64:1913–1919
Heasom W, Traver RG, Welker A (2006) Hydrologic modeling of a bioinfiltration best management practice. J Am Water Resour Assoc 42(5):1329–1347
Huber WC, Dickinson RE (1988) Storm water management model, Version 4, User’s Manual. Athens, GA. Environmental research laboratory, office of research and development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Hunt W, Jarrett A, Smith J, Sharkey L (2006) Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. J Irrig Drain Eng 132:600–608
Jones MP, Hunt WF, Willits DH (2008) Modelling the temperature dynamics of a bioretention area. 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh International Conference Centre, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Kaushal SS, Belt KT (2012) The urban watershed continuum: evolving spatial and temporal dimensions. Urban Ecosyst 15:409–435
Lee RS, Traver RG, Welker AL (2013) Continuous modeling of bioinfiltration storm-water control measures using green and Ampt. J Irrig Drain Eng 139(12):1004–1010
Li H, Davis AP (2009) Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention. J Environ Eng 135:567–576
Liu J, Sample DJ, Bell C, Guan Y (2014) Review and research needs of bioretention used for the treatment of urban storm water. Water 6(4):1069–1099
Lucas WC, Sample DJ (2015) Reducing combined sewer overflows by using outlet controls for green stormwater infrastructure: case study in Richmond, Virginia. J Hydrol 520:473–488
Meierdiercks KL, Smith JA, Baeck ML, Miller AJ (2010) Analyses of urban drainage network structure and its impact on hydrologic response. J Am Water Resour Assoc 46:932–943
Mein RG, Larson CL (1973) Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resour Res 9(2):384–394
Meng YY, Wang HX, Chen JG, Zhang SH (2014) Modelling hydrology of a single bioretention system with HYDRUS-1D. Sci World J 2014 Article ID 521047, 10. doi:10.1155/2014/521047
Olszewski J, Davis A (2013) Comparing the hydrologic performance of a bioretention cell with predevelopment values. J Irrig Drain Eng 139(2):124–130
Philip JR (1993) Variable-head ponded infiltration under constant or variable rainfall. Water Resour Res 29(7):2155–2165
Rodgers JL, Nicewander A (1988) Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. Am Stat 42(1):59–66
Rossman LA (2010) Storm water management model, User’s manual, Version 5. Water supply and water resources division national risk management research laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-05/040
Temprano J, Arango O, Cagiao J, Suarez J, Tejero I (2006) Stormwater quality calibration by SWMM: a case study in northern Spain. Water SA 32(1):55–63
Trinh DH, Chui TFM (2013) Assessing the hydrologic restoration of an urbanized area via an integrated distributed hydrological model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(12):4789–4801
Trowsdale SA, Simcock R (2011) Urban stormwater treatment using bioretention. J Hydrol 397(3–4):167–174
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2000) Low impact development (LID), A literature review. EPA-841-B-00-005. USEPA Office of Water: Washington, D.C
Yang G, Bowling LC, Cherkauer KA, Pijanowski BC (2011) The impact of urban development on hydrologic regime from catchment to basin scales. Landsc. Urban Plan 103:237–247
Zhang S, Guo Y (2014) Stormwater capture efficiency of bioretention systems. Water Resour Manag 28(1):149–168
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University, Project Number 33099. The authors would like to thank the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University for their support in undertaking this work. The authors also would like to thank to the anonymous reviewers, the associate editor, and the editor for their excellent suggestions, which strengthened the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gülbaz, S., Kazezyılmaz-Alhan, C.M. Hydrological Model of LID with Rainfall-Watershed-Bioretention System. Water Resour Manage 31, 1931–1946 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1622-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1622-9