Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrological Model of LID with Rainfall-Watershed-Bioretention System

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainable water management is crucial in the reduction of water pollution and floods. New techniques should be investigated in order to avoid present and future problems such as flood, drought, and water contamination. For this purpose, Low Impact Development-Best Management Practice (LID-BMP) has recently come into the stage in storm water management. Vegetative swales, green roofs, bioretentions, storm water wetlands, rain barrels, permeable asphalts and pavements are among LID-BMPs. Bioretention type of LID is implemented to diminish adverse effects of urbanization such as flood by reducing peak flows on surface and thus managing storm water runoff. The aim of this study is to investigate the hydrological performance of bioretentions by developing a hydrological model based on the data obtained using experimental setup called Rainfall-Watershed-Bioretention (RWB). The hydrological model of RWB (HM-RWB) consists of two main components: (i) rainfall-runoff model in which kinematic wave theory is used for simulation of surface runoff generated over the drainage area that reaches the bioretention as inflow; (ii) runoff-bioretention flow model in which Green-Ampt method under unsteady rainfall is employed and further improved by incorporating the effect of ponding depth on bioretention for the simulation of outflow at the exit of the bioretention. It is observed that the results of the hydrological model developed herein are in good agreement with the measured data obtained in the RWB experimental setup.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akan AO (2013) Preliminary design aid for bioretention filters. J Hydrol Eng 18(3):318–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelakis AN, Gikas P (2014) Water reuse: overview of current practices and trends in the world with emphasis on EU states. Water Utility Journal 8:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander KE, Owen KE, Potter KW (2004) Modeled impacts of development type on runoff volume and infiltration performance. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40(4):961–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RA, Skaggs RW, Hunt WF (2013) Calibration and validation of DRAINMOD to model bioretention hydrology. J Hydrol 486:430–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin DA (2017) Designing bioretention areas for stormwater management. Environmental Processes 4(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow V T, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied Hydrology. McGraw- Hill Book Co., New York, p 572

  • Chu ST (1978) Infiltration during an unsteady rain. Water Resour Res 14(3):461–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP, Hunt W, Traver R, Clarn M (2009) Bioretention technology: overview of current practice and future needs. J Environ Eng 135:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz M (2007) Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air Soil Pollut 186:351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleson PS (1970) Dynamic hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher TD, Andrieu H, Hamel P (2013) Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: a state of the art. Adv Water Resour 51:261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green WH, Ampt GA (1911) Studies on soil physics, 1, the flow of air and water through soils. J Agric Sci 4(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gülbaz S, Kazezyılmaz-Alhan CM (2014) Investigating effects of low impact development on surface runoff and TSS with a calibrated hydrodynamic model. Houille Blanche-Revue Internationale De L Eau 3:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gülbaz S, Kazezyılmaz-Alhan CM (2017) Experimental investigation on hydrologic performance of LID with rainfall-watershed-bioretention system. J Hydrol Eng 22(1):D4016003

  • Gülbaz S, Kazezyılmaz-Alhan CM, Copty NK (2015) Evaluation of heavy metal removal capacity of bioretention systems. Water Air Soil Pollut 226(11):376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo JCY, Luu TM (2015) Hydrologic model developed for stormwater ınfiltration practices. J Hydrol Eng 20(9):06015001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haifeng J, Yuwen L, Shaw LY, Yurong C (2012) Planning of LID–BMPs for urban runoff control: The case of Beijing Olympic Village. Sep Purif Technol 84(SI):112–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatt BE, Steinel A, Deletic A, Fletcher TD (2011) Retention of heavy metals by stormwater filtration systems: breakthrough analysis. Water Sci Technol 64:1913–1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heasom W, Traver RG, Welker A (2006) Hydrologic modeling of a bioinfiltration best management practice. J Am Water Resour Assoc 42(5):1329–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber WC, Dickinson RE (1988) Storm water management model, Version 4, User’s Manual. Athens, GA. Environmental research laboratory, office of research and development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

  • Hunt W, Jarrett A, Smith J, Sharkey L (2006) Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. J Irrig Drain Eng 132:600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MP, Hunt WF, Willits DH (2008) Modelling the temperature dynamics of a bioretention area. 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh International Conference Centre, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

  • Kaushal SS, Belt KT (2012) The urban watershed continuum: evolving spatial and temporal dimensions. Urban Ecosyst 15:409–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee RS, Traver RG, Welker AL (2013) Continuous modeling of bioinfiltration storm-water control measures using green and Ampt. J Irrig Drain Eng 139(12):1004–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Davis AP (2009) Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention. J Environ Eng 135:567–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Sample DJ, Bell C, Guan Y (2014) Review and research needs of bioretention used for the treatment of urban storm water. Water 6(4):1069–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas WC, Sample DJ (2015) Reducing combined sewer overflows by using outlet controls for green stormwater infrastructure: case study in Richmond, Virginia. J Hydrol 520:473–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meierdiercks KL, Smith JA, Baeck ML, Miller AJ (2010) Analyses of urban drainage network structure and its impact on hydrologic response. J Am Water Resour Assoc 46:932–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mein RG, Larson CL (1973) Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resour Res 9(2):384–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng YY, Wang HX, Chen JG, Zhang SH (2014) Modelling hydrology of a single bioretention system with HYDRUS-1D. Sci World J 2014 Article ID 521047, 10. doi:10.1155/2014/521047

  • Olszewski J, Davis A (2013) Comparing the hydrologic performance of a bioretention cell with predevelopment values. J Irrig Drain Eng 139(2):124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philip JR (1993) Variable-head ponded infiltration under constant or variable rainfall. Water Resour Res 29(7):2155–2165

  • Rodgers JL, Nicewander A (1988) Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. Am Stat 42(1):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman LA (2010) Storm water management model, User’s manual, Version 5. Water supply and water resources division national risk management research laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-05/040

  • Temprano J, Arango O, Cagiao J, Suarez J, Tejero I (2006) Stormwater quality calibration by SWMM: a case study in northern Spain. Water SA 32(1):55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinh DH, Chui TFM (2013) Assessing the hydrologic restoration of an urbanized area via an integrated distributed hydrological model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(12):4789–4801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowsdale SA, Simcock R (2011) Urban stormwater treatment using bioretention. J Hydrol 397(3–4):167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2000) Low impact development (LID), A literature review. EPA-841-B-00-005. USEPA Office of Water: Washington, D.C

  • Yang G, Bowling LC, Cherkauer KA, Pijanowski BC (2011) The impact of urban development on hydrologic regime from catchment to basin scales. Landsc. Urban Plan 103:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Guo Y (2014) Stormwater capture efficiency of bioretention systems. Water Resour Manag 28(1):149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University, Project Number 33099. The authors would like to thank the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University for their support in undertaking this work. The authors also would like to thank to the anonymous reviewers, the associate editor, and the editor for their excellent suggestions, which strengthened the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cevza Melek Kazezyılmaz-Alhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gülbaz, S., Kazezyılmaz-Alhan, C.M. Hydrological Model of LID with Rainfall-Watershed-Bioretention System. Water Resour Manage 31, 1931–1946 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1622-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1622-9

Keywords

Navigation