Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Non-Stationary Frequency Analysis of Extreme Water Level: Application of Annual Maximum Series and Peak-over Threshold Approaches

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A great challenge has been appeared on if the assumption of data stationary for flood frequency analysis is justifiable. Results for frequency analysis (FA) could be substantially different if non-stationarity is incorporated in the data analysis. In this study, extreme water levels (annual maximum and daily instantaneous maximum) in a coastal part of New York City were considered for FA. Annual maximum series (AMS) and peak-over threshold (POT) approaches were applied to build data timeseries. The resulted timeseries were checked for potential trend and stationarity using statistical tests including Man-Kendall, Augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) and Kwiatkowski–Phillips–Schmidt–Shin (KPSS). Akaike information criterion (AIC) was utilized to select the most appropriate probability distribution models. Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution and Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) were then applied as the probability distribution functions on the selected data based on AMS and POT methods under non-stationary assumption. Two methods of maximum likelihood and penalized maximum likelihood were applied and compared for the estimation of the distributions’ parameters. Results showed that by incorporating non-stationarity in FA, design values of extreme water levels were significantly different from those obtained under the assumption of stationarity. Moreover, in the non-stationary FA, consideration of time-dependency for the distribution parameters resulted in a range of variation for design floods. The findings of this study emphasize on the importance of FA under the assumptions of data stationarity and non-stationarity, and taking into account the worst case flooding scenarios for future planning of the watershed against the probable flood events. There is a need to update models developed for stationary flood risk assessment for more robust and resilient hydrologic predictions. Applying non-stationary FA provides an advanced method to extrapolate return levels up to the desired future time perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AghaKouchak A, Nasrollahi N (2010) Semi-parametric and parametric inference of extreme value models for rainfall data. Water Resour Manag 24:1229–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aissaoui-Fqayeh I, El-Adlouni S, Ouarda TBMJ, St-Hilaire A (2009) Développement du modèle log-normal non-stationnaireetcomparaison avec le modèle GEV non-stationnaire. Hydrol Sci J 54:1141–1156 (In French)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(6):716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayazit M (2015) Nonstationarity of hydrological records and recent trends in trend analysis: a state-of-the-art review. Environmental Processes 2(3):527–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon AJ (2010) A flexible nonlinear modelling framework for nonstationary generalized extreme value analysis in hydroclimatology. Hydrol Process 24:673–685. doi:10.1002/hyp.7506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X (2014) Extreme value distribution and peak factor of crosswind response of flexible structures with nonlinear aeroelastic effect. J Struct Eng :04014091. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001017

  • Coles S (2001) An introduction to statistical modelling of extreme values. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer Verlag, London, p 208

  • El Adlouni S, Ouarda TBMJ, Zhang X, Roy R, Bobee B (2007) Generalized maximum likelihood estimators for the non-stationary generalized extreme value model. Water Resour Res 43:W03410. doi:10.1029/2005WR004545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eregno FE, Nilsen V, Seidu R, Heistad A (2014) Evaluating the trend and extreme values of faecal indicator organisms in a raw water source: a potential approach for watershed management and optimizing water treatment practice. Environmental Processes 1(3):287–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilleland E, Katz RW (2011) New software to analyze how extremes change over time. Eos 92(2):13–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilleland E, Ribatet M, Stephenson AG (2013) A software review for extreme value analysis. Extremes 16(1):103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy KL, McCuen RH (2012) A non-stationary flood frequency analysis method to adjust for future climate change and urbanization. J Hydrol 414:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goharian E, Burian S, Bardsley T, Strong C (2015) Incorporating potential severity into vulnerability assessment of water supply systems under climate change conditions. J Water Resour Plann Manage:04015051. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943–5452.0000579

  • Hawkes PJ, Gonzalez-Marco D, Sánchez-Arcilla A, Prinos P (2008) Best practice for the estimation of extremes: Areview. J Hydraul Res 46:324–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan JE, Tawn JA (2004) A conditional approach for multivariate extreme values (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 66:497–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill BM (1975) A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution. Ann Statist 3:1163–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking JRM, Wallis JR, Wood EF (1985) Estimation of the generalized extreme-value distribution by the method of probability-weighted moments. Technometrics 27:251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal RK, Lohani AK, Tiwari HL (2015) Statistical analysis for change detection and trend assessment in climatological parameters. Environmental Processes 2(4):729–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Zahmatkesh Z, Nazif S, Razmi A (2014) An evaluation of climate change impacts on Extreme Sea level variability: coastal area of New York City. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0698-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Ahmadvand F, Fereshtehpour M (2015) Flood scenarios determination using nonstationary flood frequency analysis in coastal areas, 9th world congress, Water Resources Management in a Changing World

  • Katz RW, Parlang MB, Naveau P (2002) Statistics of extremes in hydrology. Adv Water Resour 25:1287–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG (1976) Rank correlation methods, 4th edn. Griffin

  • Ketterer F (2011) Penalized likelihood based tests for regime switching inautoregressive models. Ph.D. Thesis, MarburgUniversity, Germany

  • Khaliq MN, Ouarda TBMJ, Ondo J-C, Gachon P, Bobée B (2006) Frequency analysis of a sequence of dependent and/or non-stationary hydrometeorological observations: a review. J Hydrol 329:534–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kron W (2005) Flood risk = hazard exposure vulnerability. International Water Resources Association, Water International 30:58–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit Root. J Econ 54:159–178 North-Holland

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang M, Ouarda TBMJ, Bobeè B (1999) Towards operational guidelines for over-threshold modeling. J Hydrol 47:103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Bicknell C, Lowry R, Li Y (2012) A comparison of extreme wave analysis methods with 1994–2010 offshore Perth dataset. Coastal Engineering 69:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li LC, Zhang LP, Xia J, Gippel CJ, Wang RC, Zeng SD (2015) Implications of modelled climate and land cover changes on runoff in the middle route of the south to north water transfer project in China. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-0957-3

    Google Scholar 

  • López J, Francés F (2013) Non-stationary flood frequency analysis in continental Spanish rivers, using climate and reservoir indices as external covariates. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:3189–3203. doi:10.5194/hess-17-3189-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loretan M, Phillips P (1994) Testing the covariance stationarity of Heavytailed timeseries. J Empir Financ 1:211–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay EBL, Challenor PG, Bahaj AS (2001) A comparison of estimators for the generalised Pareto distribution. Ocean Eng 38:1338–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makarov M (2007) Applications of exact extreme value theorem. J Oper Risk :115–120

  • Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. J Econometric Soc Econometrica :245–259

  • Mendez FJ, Menendez M, Luceno A, Losada IJ (2007) Analyzing monthly extreme sea levels with a time dependent GEV model. J Atm Ocean Technol 24:894–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly P, Wetherald R, Dunne K, Delworth T (2002) Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature 415:514–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Dunne KA, Vecchia AV (2005) Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438(7066):347–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whiter water management? Science 319(5863):573–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudersbach C, Jensen J (2010) Non-stationary extreme value analysis of annual maximum water levels for designing coastal structures on the German North Sea coastline. Journalof Flood RiskManagement 3:52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeysekera J, Salas JD (2014) Quantifying the uncertainty of design floods under nonstationary conditions. J Hydrol Eng 19(7):1438–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey MD, Van Gelder PHAJM, Vrijling JK (2001) The estimation of extreme quantiles of wind velocity using Lmoments in the peaks-over-threshold approach. Struc Saf 23:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parent E, Bernier J (2003) Bayesian pot modeling for historical data. J Hydrol 274(1–4):95–108. doi:10.1016/S0022-1394(02)00396-7ISSN 0022-1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribatet M, Sauquet E, Grésillon J-M, Ouarda TBMJ (2007) A regional Bayesian POT model for flood frequency analysis. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21:327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribereau P, Guillou A, Naveau P (2008) Estimating return levels from maxima of non-stationary random sequences using the generalized PWM method. Nonlin Processes Geophys 15:1033–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said SE, Dickey DA (1984) Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika 71:599–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saf B (2008) Application of index procedures to flood frequency analysis in Turkey. Journal of the America Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 44(1):37–47. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00136.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas JD (1993) Analysis and modelling of hydrologic timeseries. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, pp 19.1–19.72

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas J, Obeysekera J (2013) Revisiting the concepts of return period and risk for non-stationary hydrologic extreme events. J Hydrol Eng. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584. 0000820

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas JD, Obeysekera J (2014) Revisiting the concepts of return period and risk for non-stationary hydrologic extreme events. J Hydrol Eng 19:554–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva AT, Portela MM, Naghettini M (2014) On peaks-over-threshold modeling of floods with zero-inflated poisson arrivals under stationarity and nonstationarity. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28(6):1587–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southworth H, Heffernan JE (2010) texmex: Threshold exceedences and multivariate extremes, R package version 1.0

  • Stephenson AG (2011) ismev: An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, Original S functions written by Janet E. Heffernan with R port and documentation provided by A. G. Stephenson. R package version 1.35 ed

  • Strupczewski WG, Kaczmarek Z (2001) Non-stationary approach to at-site flood frequency modeling II. Weighted least squares estimation. J Hydrol 248(1–4):143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strupczewski WG, Singh VP, Feluch W (2001a) Non-stationary approach to at-site flood frequency modeling I. maximum likelihood estimation. J Hydrol 248(1–4):123–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strupczewski WG, Singh VP, Mitosek HT (2001b) Non-stationary approach to at-site flood frequency modeling III. Flood analysis of polish rivers. J Hydrol 248(1–4):152–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syczewska, E. M. (2010). Empirical power of the Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-shin test (No. 45).

  • Tramblay Y, Neppel L, Carreau J, Kenza N (2013) Non-stationary frequency analysis of heavy rainfall events in southern France. Hydrol Sci J 58:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasiliades L, Galiatsatou P, Loukas A (2015) Non-stationary frequency analysis of annual maximum rainfall using climate covariates. Water Resour Manag 29(2):339–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villarini G, Serinaldi F, Smith JA, Krajewski WF (2009) On the stationarity of annual flood peaks in the continental United States during the 20th century. Water Resour Res 45(8):W08417. doi:10.1029/2008WR007645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong LH, Guo SL (2004) Trend test and change-point detection for the annual discharge series of the Yangtze River at the Yichang hydrological station. Hydrol Sci J 49(1):99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahmatkesh Z, Karamouz M, Goharian E, Burian S (2014) Analysis of the effects of climate change on urban storm water runoff using statistically downscaled precipitation data and a change factor approach. J Hydrol Eng :05014022. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001064

  • Zahmatkesh Z, Karamouz M, Nazif S (2015) Uncertainty based modeling of rainfall-runoff: combined differential evolution adaptive metropolis (DREAM) and K-means clustering. Adv Water Resour 83:405–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

    Ali Razmi & Saeed Golian

  2. Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

    Zahra Zahmatkesh

Authors
  1. Ali Razmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saeed Golian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zahra Zahmatkesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Golian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Razmi, A., Golian, S. & Zahmatkesh, Z. Non-Stationary Frequency Analysis of Extreme Water Level: Application of Annual Maximum Series and Peak-over Threshold Approaches. Water Resour Manage 31, 2065–2083 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1619-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1619-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation