Skip to main content
Log in

Hydraulic Analysis of Water Distribution Systems Based on Fixed Point Iteration Method

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water distribution systems with complex configurations are important urban facilities and the hydraulic analysis is essential for system design, optimization and management. Hydraulic analysis involves the procedure of calculating the hydraulic parameters of nodal pressure heads and pipe flow rates under steady-state condition. The equations governing the heads and flows are nonlinear and the most popular method for solving the equations is the Newton-Raphson method, which is the basis of existing hydraulic simulator (EPANET 2). In this paper, fixed point iteration method is proposed for hydraulic analysis after transformation of the original nonlinear equations. Compared to EPANET 2, the proposed method can analyze a water distribution system without differentiation for the convergence for some problems which cannot be solved by EPANET 2. Three test networks were analyzed by the proposed method and EPANET 2. It is proved that the proposed method could get the convergence after a series of iterations, even in cases that EPANET 2 fail. And the initial values of nodal pressure heads and the specified calculation accuracy are considered to have influences on the calculation procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdy Sayyed MAH, Gupta R, Tanyimboh TT (2015) Noniterative application of EPANET for pressure dependent modelling of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 29:3227–3242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramov NN (1972) Theory and calculation technique for water supply systems. Stroizdat, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman T, Boulos P (1995) Solving flow constrained networks: inverse problem. J Hydraul Eng 121:427–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez R, Gorev NB, Kodzhespirova IF, Kovalenko Y, Negrete S, Ramos A, Rivera JJ (2008) Pseudotransient continuation method in extended period simulation of water distribution systems. J Hydraul Eng 134:1473–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez R, Gorev NB, Kodzhespirova IF, Kovalenko Y, Prokhorov E, Ramos A (2011) Pseudotransient continuation-based steady state solver: extension to zero flow rates. J Hydraul Eng 137:393–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zahrani MA (2014) Modeling and simulation of water distribution system: a case study. Arab J Sci Eng 39:1621–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhave PR (1988) Extended period simulation of water systems-direct solution. J Environ Eng 114:1146–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhave PR (1990) Rules for solvability of pipe networks. J Indian Water Works Assoc 22:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross H (1936) Analysis of flow in network of conduits or conductors. University of Illinois Bulletin, Engineering Experiment Station 34(286):11–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Divenot A (1980) A new method for computation of looped networks. La Houille Blanche 6:365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dokkyun Y, Do-Hyung K, Eunyoun K, Sung-Dae Y (2009) Convergence of a fixed point iteration method for the OSV model. Appl Math Comput 215:1780–1790

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhay S, Simpson AR (2011) Dealing with zero flows in solving the nonlinear equations for water distribution systems. J Hydraul Eng 137:1216–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giustolisi O, Laucelli D, Colombo AF (2009) Deterministic versus stochastic design of water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayuti MH, Burrows R, Naga D (2007) Modelling water distribution systems with deficient pressure. Proc Inst Civil Engineers: Water Manag 160:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • He P, Tao T, Xin KL, Li SP, Yan HX (2016) Modelling water distribution systems with deficient pressure: an improved iterative methodology. Water Resour Manag 30:593–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MS, Sadiq R, Rodriguez MJ, Najjaran H, Francisque A, Hoorfar M (2014) Water distribution system failure: a framework for forensic analysis. Environment Systems and Decisions 34:168–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koung HL, George P, Fermín S, Viloche B (2010) Fixed-point iterations in determining a Tikhonov regularization parameter in Kirsch’s factorization method. Appl Math Comput 216:3747–3753

    Google Scholar 

  • Krope J, Dobersek D, Goricanec D (2006) Flow pressure analysis of pipe networks with linear theory method, proceedings of the WSEAS/IASME Int. Conference on Fluid Mechanics, Miami, Florida, USA, January 18-20:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang T (1971) Design conduit system by dynamic programming. J Hydraul Div 97:383–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Yu G (2013) Iterative methodology of pressure-dependent demand based on EPANET for pressure deficient water distribution analysis. J Water Resour Plan Manag 139:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariam ASA, Khuri AS (2015) A novel fixed point iteration method for the solution of third order boundary value problems. Appl Math Comput 271:131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi M, Haghighi A (2015) A graph portioning approach for hydraulic analysis-design of looped pipe networks. Water Resour Manag 29:5339–5352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman LA (2002) EPANET 2 User’s manual. Water supply and water resources division. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbu I (1987) Computational model of hydraulic state in complex water distribution networks. Hydrotechnics 8:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbu I (2014) Nodal analysis of urban water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 28:3143–3159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabesh M, Shirzad A, Arefkhani V, Mani A (2014) A comparative study between the modified and available demand driven based models for head driven analysis of water distribution networks. Urban Water J 11:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todini E, Pilati S (1988) A gradient algorithm for the analysis of pipe networks. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris G, Spiliotis M (2014) A Newton-Raphson analysis of urban water systems based on nodal head-driven outflow. Eur J Environ Civil Eng 18:882–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood D, Rayes A (1981) Reliability of algorithms for pipe network analyses. J Hydraul Div 107:982–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZY, Wang RH, Walski TM, Yang SY, Bowdler D, Baggett CC (2009) Extended global-gradient algorithm for pressure-dependent water distribution analysis. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang KP, Liang T, Wu IP (1975) Design of conduit system with diverging branches. J Hydraul Div 101:167–188

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51508452 and No. 51378413), Teaching reform project of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology (JG021510), Research team on enhanced purification of drinking water and water quality assurance of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Cheng, X., Huang, T. et al. Hydraulic Analysis of Water Distribution Systems Based on Fixed Point Iteration Method. Water Resour Manage 31, 1605–1618 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1601-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1601-1

Keywords

Navigation