A New Approach for Trend Assessment of Annual Streamflows: a Case Study of Hydropower Plants in Serbia
The authors propose a new approach for trend assessment that takes into account long-term periodicity of annual flows. In particular, analysis is performed of annual flows recorded at the locations of 30 operating and designed hydropower plants (HPPs) in Serbia, in order to assess the current and future water availability for hydropower generation. The composite annual trend is determined by sliding a fixed time window of 30 years along the observed time series with a one-year time step. Such a linear moving window (LMW) approach enables the identification of the flow trend as a median of all values for each time step. Significant trend harmonics are determined using discrete spectral analysis. The results show an alternation of upward and downward trend phases of different durations, namely: 67–87, 33–43 and 21–29 years. On the other hand, the results of the Mann-Kendall test indicate a monotonic downward trend at the studied sites in the Drina River Basin, while statistically insignificant trends are noted at other river basins. The Mann-Kendall test with the Theil-Sen estimator also implies a downward and statistically insignificant flow trend after the observed period, whereas the LMW approach indicates a probable trend increase at all the examined sites. The proposed approach can be used to predict annual flows in order to establish long-term water management plans at hydropower plants.
KeywordsAnnual flow trend Long-term periodicity Hydropower plant Water management plans South-east European rivers
This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological development of the Republic of Serbia as a part of the project TR 37013 "System development to support optimal sustainability of the high dams in Serbia, 2010-2016".
- Eurostat (2016) Electricity prices by type of user. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=ten00117&plugin=1. 20 Dec 2016
- Gurbuz A (2006) The role of hydropower in sustainable development. Eur Water 13(14):63–70Google Scholar
- Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (2002) Statistical Methods in Water Resources Techniques of Water Resources Investigations. Book 4. chapter A3. U.S. Geological Survey. USAGoogle Scholar
- Karpouzos DK, Kavalieratou S, Babajimopoulos C (2010) Trend analysis of precipitation data in Pieria region (Greece). Eur Water 30:31–40Google Scholar
- Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods, 4th edition. Charles Griffin, London, p 202Google Scholar
- Labat D (2006) Oscillations in land surface hydrological cycle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 242(1–2):143–154Google Scholar
- Sale MJ, Kao SC, Ashfaq M, Kaiser, DP, Martinez R, Webb C, Wei Y (2012) Assessment of the Effects of Climate Change on Federal Hydropower. Technical Manual 2011/251. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
- Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Non-parametric statistics for the Behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Stojković M, Prohaska S, Plavšić J (2015) Stochastic structure of annual discharges of large European rivers. J Hydrosci Hydraul Eng 63:63–70Google Scholar
- WMO (2016) World Meteorological Organisation http://public.wmo.int/en/our-mandate/climate. Accessed 30 Oct 2016
- Yevjevich V (1972) Stochastic processes in hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
- Yue S, Wang CY (2002) Applicability of pre-whitening to eliminate the influence of serial correlation on the MannKendall test. Water Resour Manag 38:611–624Google Scholar