With a service area population exceeding four million people and with close to 90 % of the water supply being imported from sources outside the city, the Los Angeles water system is subject to multiple stressors, including climate change and population growth. The influence of various factors on water demand in Los Angeles was evaluated through development and application of multiple linear regression models for residential, commercial, industrial, and governmental water demand categories from 1970 to 2014 in the service area of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Performance of the models in describing historical water demand was compared using the coefficient of determination, mean average percent error, and normalized root mean square error. Overall, the results of the linear regression models demonstrated that each water demand category is affected by different parameters. However, price and population were found to have the most significant impact on all categories. The seasonality of residential water demand was well described with the model based on monthly data, with precipitation and temperature being highly significant factors. Fitting of the residential data furthermore revealed that price and conservation have significantly counteracted the impact of population growth on water demand.
Urban water demand Water management Water conservation Regression analysis
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors would like to thank Simon Hsu, Chris Repp, and Priscilla Gonzalez of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power for providing information used in this study. Support for this work was provided by a Carnegie Mellon University College of Engineering Dean’s Fellowship and a Steinbrenner Institute U.S. Environmental Sustainability Fellowship to Negin Ashoori. The Fellowship was supported by a grant from the Colcom Foundation, and by the Steinbrenner Institute for Environmental Education and Research. The work was also supported by the Hamerschlag University Professorship of David Dzombak, and the H. John Heinz Professorship of Mitchell Small.
Chang H, Praskievicz S, Parandvash H (2014) Sensitivity of urban water consumption to weather climate variability at multiple temporal scales: the case of Portland. Int J Geospatial Environ Res 1:7Google Scholar
Dahal V, Shakya NM, Bhattarai R (2016) Estimating the impact of climate change on water availability in Bagmati Basin, Nepal. Environ Process 3:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House-Peters L, Pratt B, Chang H (2011) Effects of urban spatial structure, sociodemographics, and climate on residential water consumption in Hillsboro, Oregon. J Am Water Works Assoc 46(3):461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain A, Varshney AK, Joshi UC (2002) Short-term water demand forecast modelling at IIT Kanpur using artificial neural networks. Water Resour Manag 15:299–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy SB, Chen L, Girvetz EH, Maurer EP, Mills WB, Grieb TM (2012) Projecting water withdrawal and supply for future decades in the U.S. Under climate change scenarios. Environ Sci Technol 46:2545–2556. doi:10.1021/es2030774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruth M, Bernier C, Jollands N, Golubiewski N (2007) Adaptation of urban water supply infrastructure to impacts from climate and socioeconomic changes: the case of Hamilton, New Zealand. Water Resour Manag 21:1031–1045. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9071-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamouris M, Kapsis K, Korres D, Livada I, Pavlou C, Assimakopoulos MN (2007) On the relation between the energy and social characteristics of the residential sector. Energy Build 39:893–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar