Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization of Osmotic Desalination Plants for Water Supply Networks

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water scarcity and the poor quality of water resources are leading to a wider diffusion of desalination plants using the Reverse Osmosis (RO) process. Unfortunately, the cost of a cubic meter of fresh water produced by an RO plants is still high and many efforts are in progress to increase the efficiency of the membranes used in osmotic plants and to limit the energy required by the process. A further reduction of the energy cost could be obtained by an optimal operation of the desalination plant so reducing the hourly energy cost, or by coupling the RO plant with an energy production plant based on direct osmosis (Pressure Retarded Osmosis PRO).

The economic viability of the desalination process has been analyzed until now without accounting for the integration of the RO plant with the existing water network. This analysis is developed in the present paper with reference to a hypothetical change of water supply in a real network, where a desalination plant is used to satisfy the fresh water demand. Several scenarios will be analyzed to assess the minimum cost of fresh water production and water supply to the network, including the use of energy recovery systems, such as an integrated use of RO and PRO processes, or the regulation of pressure at the network intake by a micro hydro power plant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

RO:

Reverse Osmosis

PRO:

Pressure Retarded Osmosis

WSN:

Water Supply Network

PRV:

Pressure Reduction Valve

PAT:

Pump as Turbine

ERD:

Energy Recovery Device

HPP:

Hydro Power Plant

VOS:

Variable Operating Strategy

PES:

Pressure Exchange System

S & P:

Store and Pump

P & S:

Pump and Store

DS:

Direct Supply

SPS:

Seawater Pumping System

References

  • Akgul D, Çakmakcı M, Kayaalp N, Koyuncu I (2008) Cost analysis of seawater desalination with reverse osmosis in Turkey. Desalination 220(1–3):123–131. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altaee A, Sharif A (2015) Pressure retarded osmosis: advancement in the process applications for power generation and desalination. Desalination 356:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo LS, Ramos H, Coelho ST (2006) Pressure control for leakage minimisation in water distribution systems management. Water Resour Manag 20(1):133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carravetta A, Del Giudice G, Fecarotta O, Ramos HM (2012) Energy production in water distribution networks: a PAT design strategy. Water Resour Manag 26(13):3947–3959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carravetta A, Fecarotta O, Del Giudice G, Ramos H (2014a) Energy recovery in water systems by PATs: a comparisons among the different installation schemes. Procedia Eng 70:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carravetta A, Fecarotta O, Martino R, Antipodi L (2014b) PAT efficiency variation with design parameters. Procedia Eng 70:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carravetta A, Fecarotta O, Sinagra M, Tucciarelli T (2014c) Cost-benefit analysis for hydropower production in water distribution networks by a pump as turbine. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(6):04014002. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charcosset C (2009) A review on membrane processes and renewable energies for desalination. Desalination 245:214–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai PD, Li P (2016) Optimal Pressure Regulation in Water Distribution Systems Based on an Extended Model for Pressure Reducing Valves. Water Resources Management, 1–16

  • De Marchis M, Fontanazza C, Freni G, La Loggia G, Napoli E, Notaro V (2011) Analysis of the impact of intermittent distribution by modelling the network-filling process. J Hydroinf 13(3):358–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fecarotta O, Aricò C, Carravetta A, Martino R, Ramos HM (2014) Hydropower potential in water distribution networks: pressure control by PATs. Water Resour Manag 29(3):699–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fecarotta O, Carravetta A, Ramos HM, Martino R (2016) An improved affinity model to enhance variable operating strategy for pumps used as turbines. J Hydraul Res 54(3):332–341. doi:10.1080/00221686.2016.1141804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaius-obaseki T (2010) Hydropower opportunities in the water industry. Int J Environ Sci 1(3):392–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghobeity A, Mitsos A (2010) Optimal time-dependent operation of seawater reverse osmosis. Desalination 263(1–3):76–88. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Jeong K, Park MJ, Shon HK, Kim JH (2015) Recent advances in osmotic energy generation via pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO): a review. Energies 8:11821–11845. doi:10.3390/en81011821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura S, Sourirajan S (1967) Analysis of data in reverse osmosis with porous cellulose acetate membranes. AICHE J 13(3):497–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb S (1998) Energy production at the Dead Sea by pressure-retarded osmosis: challenge or chimera? Desalination 120(3):247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu YY, Hu YD, Zhang XL, Wu LY, Liu QZ (2007) Optimum design of reverse osmosis system under different feed concentration and product specification. J Membr Sci 287(2):219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcovecchio MG, Mussati SF, Aguirre PA, Scenna NJ (2005) Optimization of hybrid desalination processes including multi stage flash and reverse osmosis systems. Desalination 182(1–3):111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCool BC, Rahardianto A, Faria J, Kovac K, Lara D, Cohen Y (2010) Feasibility of reverse osmosis desalination of brackish agricultural drainage water in the San Joaquin Valley. Desalination 261(3):240–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNabola A, Coughlan P, Williams A (2011) The Technical and Economic Feasibility of Energy Recovery in Water Supply Networks. Proceedings of International Conference on Renewable Energy and Power Quality, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. Vol. 1315

  • Prante JL, Ruskowitz JA, Childress AE, Achilli A (2014) RO-PRO desalination: an integrated low-energy approach to seawater desalination. Appl Energy 120:104–114. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott S, Ulanicki B (2008) Improved control of pressure reducing valves in water distribution networks. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 134(1):56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punys P, Dumbrauskas A, Kvaraciejus A, Vyciene G (2011) Tools for small hydropower plant resource planning and development: a review of technology and applications. Energies 4:1258–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos HM, Mello M, De P (2010) Clean power in water supply systems as a sustainable solution: from planning to practical implementation. Water Sci Technol 10(1):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimund KK, McCutcheon JR, Wilson AD (2015) Thermodynamic analysis of energy density in pressure retarded osmosis: the impact of solution volumes and costs. J Membr Sci 487:240–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, L.A. (2000) EPANET 2 User’s manual. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, U.S.A

  • Thompson J, Rahardianto A, Gu H, Uchymiak M, Bartman A, Hedrick M, Lara D, Cooper J, Faria J, Christofides PD, Cohen Y (2013) Rapid field assessment of RO desalination of brackish agricultural drainage water. Water Res 47(8):2649–2660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorsen T, Holt T (2009) The potential for power production from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. J Membr Sci Vol 335(1–2):103–110. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivas E, Maia R (2013) Economic valuation of drought impacts on urban water supply systems. Application to a Portuguese drought prone area. EWRA 8th International Conference on Water Resources Management in an Interdisciplinary and Changing Context, 26th–29th June

  • Walsky T, Bezts W, Posluzny E, Weir M, Withman B (2006) Modeling leakage reduction through pressure control. J Am Water Works Assoc 98(4):147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilf M (2005) RO, NF and membrane filtration technology for potable water applications. Seminar (February 14–17), L’Aquila, Italy, European Desalination Society

  • Xu Q, Chen Q, Ma J, Blanckaert K, Wan Z (2014) Water saving and energy reduction through pressure management in urban water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 28(11):3715–3726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu A, Christofides PD, Cohen Y (2009) Minimization of energy consumption for a two-pass membrane desalination: effect of energy recovery, membrane rejection and retentate recycling. J Membr Sci 339(1–2):126–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziolkowska JR (2015) Is desalination affordable? – regional cost and price analysis. Water Resour Manag 29(5):1385–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziolkowska JR, Ziolkowski B (2016) Effectiveness of water Management in Europe in the twenty-first century. Water Resour Manag 30:2261–2274

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Martino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carravetta, A., Fecarotta, O., Golia, U.M. et al. Optimization of Osmotic Desalination Plants for Water Supply Networks. Water Resour Manage 30, 3965–3978 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1404-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1404-9

Keywords

Navigation