Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-Objective Operating Rules for Danjiangkou Reservoir Under Climate Change

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The natural variations of climatic system, as well as the potential influence of human activity on global warming, have changed the hydrologic cycle and threatened current water resources management. And the conflicts between different objectives in reservoir operation may become more and more challenging because of the impact of climate change. This study aims at deriving multi-objective operating rules to adapt to climate change and alleviate the conflicts. By combining the reservoir operation function and operating rule curves, an adaptive multi-objective operation model was proposed and developed. The optimal operating rules derived both by dynamic programming and NSGA-II method were compared and discussed. The projection pursuit method was used to select the best operating rules. The results demonstrate that the reservoir operating rules obtained by NSGA-II can increase the power generation and water supply yield and reliability, and the rules focusing on water supply can significantly increase the reservoir annual water supply yield (by 18.7 %). It is shown that the proposed model would be effective in reservoir operation under climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afshar A, Shafii M, Bozorg Haddad O (2011) Optimizing multi-reservoir operating rules: an improved HBMO approach. J Hydroinf 13(1):121–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi M, Bozorg Haddad O, Loáiciga HA (2014a) Adaptive reservoir operating rules under climatic change. Water Resour Manag 29(4):1247–1266

  • Ahmadi M, Bozorg Haddad O, Mariño MA (2014b) Extraction of flexible multi-objective real-time reservoir operating rules. Water Resour Manag 28(1):131–147

  • Bellman R (1956) Dynamic programming and Lagrange multipliers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 42(10):767–769

  • Bozorg Haddad O, Marino MA (2007) Dynamic penalty function as a strategy in solving water resources combinatorial optimization problems with honey-bee mating optimization (HBMO) algorithm. J Hydroinf 9(3):233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang LC, Chang FJ (2009) Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for operating parallel reservoir system. J Hydrol 377(1):12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang FJ, Chen L, Chang LC (2005) Optimizing the reservoir operating rule curves by genetic algorithms. Hydrol Process 19(11):2277–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, McPhee J, Yeh WWG (2007) A diversified multiobjective GA for optimizing reservoir rule curves. Adv Water Resour 30(5):1082–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui HJ (1997) The laws of the iterated logarithm for two kinds of PP statistics. Stat Probabil Lett 32(3):235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. Lect Notes Comput Sci 1917:849–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eum HI, Simonovic SP (2010) Integrated reservoir management system for adaptation to climate change: the Nakdong River Basin in Korea. Water Resour Manag 24(13):3397–3417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallah-Mehdipour E, Bozorg Haddad O, Rezapour Tabari MM, Mariño MA (2012) Extraction of decision alternatives in construction management projects: Application and adaptation of NSGA-II and MOPSO. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):2794–2803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • François B, Hingray B, Hendrickx F, Creutin JD (2014) Seasonal patterns of water storage as signatures of the climatological equilibrium between resource and demand. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 18(9):3787–3800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH (1987) Exploratory projection pursuit. J Am Stat Assoc 82(397):249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal MK, Ojha CSP, Singh RD, Swamee PK, Nema RK (2013) Application of ANN, fuzzy logic and decision tree algorithms for the development of reservoir operating rules. Water Resour Manag 27(3):911–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo SL, Guo J, Zhang J, Chen H (2009) VIC distributed hydrological model to predict climate change impact in the Hanjiang Basin. Sci China Technol Sc 52(11):3234–3239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Chen H, Xu CY, Guo SL, Guo JL (2012) Prediction of variability of precipitation in the Yangtze River Basin under the climate change conditions based on automated statistical downscaling. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 26(2):157–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo JL, Guo SL, Li Y, Chen H, Li TY (2013) Spatial and temporal variation of extreme precipitation indices in the Yangtze River basin, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(2):459–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto T, Stedinger JR, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huth R (2002) Statistical downscaling of daily temperature in Central Europe. J Clim 15(13):1731–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang T, Chen YD, Xu C, Chen X, Chen X, Singh VP (2007) Comparison of hydrological impacts of climate change simulated by six hydrologicalmodels in the Dongjiang Basin, South China. J Hydrol 336(3):316–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim T, Heo JH, Jeong CS (2006) Multi-reservoir system optimization in the Hanjiang basin using multi‐objective genetic algorithms. Hydrol Process 20(9):2057–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldsen TR, Rosbjerg D (2004) Choice of reliability, resilience and vulnerability estimators for risk assessments of water resources systems. Hydrol Sci J 49(5):755–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labadie J (2004) Optimal operation of multi-reservoir systems: state-of-the-art review. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130(2):93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang X, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Burges SJ (1994) A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J Geophys Res-Atmos 99(D7):14415–14428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone B, Bovolo CI, Bellin A, Blenkinsop S, Fowler HJ (2012) Modeling the impacts of future climate change on water resources for the Gállego river basin (Spain). Water Resour Res 48(1), W01512

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon TA, Adeloye AJ, Zhou SL (2006) Understanding performance measures of reservoirs. J Hydrol 324(1):359–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TD (2003) Pattern scaling: an examination of the accuracy of the technique for describing future climates. Clim Chang 60(3):217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, Van Vuuren DP, Wilbanks TJ (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moy WS, Cohon JL, ReVelle CS (1986) A programming model for analysis of the reliability, resilience, and vulnerability of a water supply reservoir. Water Resour Res 22(4):489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira R, Loucks DP (1997) Operating rules for multi-reservoir systems. Water Resour Res 33(4):839–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostadrahimi L, Mariño MA, Afshar A (2012) Multi-reservoir operating rules: multi-swarm PSO-based optimization approach. Water Resour Manag 26(2):407–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Midgley PM (2014) Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefli B (2015) Projecting hydropower production under future climates: a guide for decision-makers and modelers to interpret and design climate change impact assessments. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water. doi:10.1002/wat2.1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Shokri A, Bozorg Haddad O, Mariño MA (2013) Algorithm for increasing the speed of evolutionary optimization and its accuracy in multi-objective problems. Water Resour Manag 27(7):2231–2249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Zhang X, Yang Z, Ding J (2006) Projection pursuit cluster model based on genetic algorithm and its application in Karstic water pollution evaluation. Int J Environ Pollut 28(3):253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw R, Sharif M (1999) Evaluation of genetic algorithms for optimal reservoir system operation. J Water Res Plan Man 125(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetterhall F, Bárdossy A, Chen D, Halldin S, Xu CY (2006) Daily precipitation‐downscaling techniques in three Chinese regions. Water Resour Res 42(11), W11423

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Harris I (2006) A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low‐flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK. Water Resour Res 42(2), W02419

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TML, Conway D, Jones PD, Hewitson BC, Main J, Wilks DS (1998) Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: A comparison of methods. Water Resour Res 34(11):2995–3008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Dawson CW, Barrow EM (2002) SDSM—a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environ Model Softw 17(2):145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin X, Wu T, Li J, Wang Z, Li W, Wu F (2013) How well does BCC_CSM1.1 reproduce the 20th century climate change over China? Atmos Ocean Sci Lett 6(1):21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh WWG (1985) Reservoir management and operations models: A state of the art review. Water Resour Res 21(12):1797–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu PS, Yang TC, Wu CK (2002) Impact of climate change on water resources in southern Taiwan. J Hydrol 260(1–4):161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YL, Guo SL (2013) Incorporating ecological requirement into multipurpose reservoir operating rule curves for adaptation to climate change. J Hydrol 498:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51539009, 51422907, 51190094). The authors would like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which helped improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shenglian Guo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, G., Guo, S., Li, L. et al. Multi-Objective Operating Rules for Danjiangkou Reservoir Under Climate Change. Water Resour Manage 30, 1183–1202 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1220-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1220-7

Keywords

Navigation