Water Resources Management

, Volume 29, Issue 14, pp 4919–4926 | Cite as

Are Reservoirs Water Consumers or Water Collectors? Reflections on the Water Footprint Concept Applied on Reservoirs

  • T. H. Bakken
  • F. Kjosavik
  • Å. Killingtveit
  • K. Alfredsen
Article

Abstract

IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources (2011) revealed potentially very high water consumption rates from hydropower production compared to other renewable technologies, but suffered from few studies and methodological problems. More recent studies present new estimates values far beyond those presented by IPCC, some claiming that hydropower is a large-scale water consumer, but do not provide a more consistent picture of the ‘true water consumption of hydropower’. We compiled data from ICOLD’s World Register of Dams, considered being the most extensive and complete global dataset of reservoirs and dams larger than 15 m containing description of close to 40 000 dams and reservoirs. We coupled this dataset with water scarcity information about the location of the individual projects and found that only very few reservoirs located in water-scarce areas are used exclusively for hydropower production or have that as their main purpose (fewer than 0.1 %). As the purpose of the majority of the reservoirs located in water-scarce areas are to collect water in the wet season to secure adequate supply of water for irrigation, domestic supply, industry and more purposes in the dry season, we find it fundamentally problematic to assign a water footprint to such an infrastructure, even though the purpose of these reservoirs might also be to produce electricity. Rather opposite - the fact that reservoirs increase the availability of water in the dry season make reservoirs needed. We conclude that assigning water footprint/consumption values of reservoirs will convey the wrong message to decision-makers unless the reservoirs’ effect on the availability of local water resources is fully accounted for.

Keywords

Water footprint Reservoirs Hydropower 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Rune Engesæter at the Norwegian National Committee on Large Dams (NNCOLD) for the kind provision of access to the ICOLD data. The study has received financial support via EcoManage, funded by the Research Council of Norway (contract no: 215934/E20). EcoManage is organised under the research centre CEDREN (Centre for Environmental Design of Renewable Energy – www.cedren.no).

References

  1. Bakken TH, Killingtveit Å, Engeland K, Alfredsen K, Harby A (2013) Water consumption from hydropower plants—review of published estimates and an assessment of the concept. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:3983–4000. doi: 10.5194/hess-17-3983-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (eds) (2008) Climate change and water, technical paper of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, p 210Google Scholar
  3. Chenoweth J, Hadjikakou M, Zoumides C (2014) Review article: quantifying the human impact on water resources: a critical review of the water footprint concept. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:2325–2342. doi: 10.5194/hess-18-2325-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demeke TA, Marence M, Mynett AE (2013) Evaporation from reservoirs and the hydropower water footprint, in: proceedings from Africa 2013, 16–18 April 2013. Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Falkenmark M (1989) The massive water scarcity threatening Africa-why isn't it being addressed. Ambio 18:112–118Google Scholar
  6. Fulton J, Cooley H, Gleick PH (2014) Water footprint outcomes and policy relevance change with scale considered: evidence from California. Water Resour Manag 28:3637–3649. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0692-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Hoekstra AY, van der Meer T (2009) The water footprint of energy from biomass: a quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supply. Ecol Econ 68:1052–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herath I, Deurer M, Horne D, Singh R, Clothier B (2011) The water footprint of hydroelectricity: a methodological comparison from a case study in New Zealand. J Clean Prod 19:1582–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. ICOLD (2014) World register of dams. Data accessed 18 June, 2014. This is a database with restricted accessGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC (2011) In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadne S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlöme S, von Stechow CE (eds) IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. IPCC (2014) In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. ISO 14046 (2014) ISO International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management—Water footprint—Principles, requirements and guidelines. Draft version August 2014Google Scholar
  14. Maestre-Valero JF, Martínez-Granados D, Martínez-Alvarez V, Calatrava J (2013) Socio-economic impact of evaporation losses from reservoirs under past, current and future water availability scenarios in the semi-arid Segura Basin. Water Resour Manag 27:1411–1426. doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0245-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2012) The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:179–187. doi: 10.5194/hess-16-179-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Olsson G (2012) Water and Energy. Water and Energy. Threats and Opportunities. IWA Publishing. ISBN: 9781780400266Google Scholar
  17. Strzepek KM, Yohe GW, Tol RSJ, Rosegrant M (2008) The value of the Aswan high Dam to the Egyptian economy. Ecol Econ 66(1):117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tremblay A, Tardif S, Strachan IB, Turpin C (2014) Environmental effects. Studying the net evaporation effect from the Eastman-1 Reservoir. Hydror RevGoogle Scholar
  19. Weichert S (2013) Evaluation of methods measuring the water consumption of hydropower. Master’s thesis at Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany and Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Dept. of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  20. Yesuf MB (2012) Impacts of cascade hydropower plants on the flow of the river system and water level in Lake Turkana in Omo-Ghibe Catchment, Ethiopia, Master’s thesis at Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Dept. of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. H. Bakken
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Kjosavik
    • 1
    • 2
  • Å. Killingtveit
    • 1
  • K. Alfredsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Hydraulic and Environmental EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.SINTEF Energy ResearchTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations