Skip to main content
Log in

Application of Feedforward Artificial Neural Network in Muskingum Flood Routing: a Black-Box Forecasting Approach for a Natural River System

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to limited data sources, practical situations in most developing countries favor black-box models for real time flood forecasting. The Muskingum routing model, despite its limitations, is a widely used technique, and produces flood values and the time of the flood peak. This method has been extensively researched to find an ideal parameter estimation of its nonlinear forms, which require more parameters, and are not often adequate for flood routing in natural rivers with multiple peaks. This study examines the application of artificial neural network (ANN) approach based on the Muskingum equation, and compares the feedforward multilayer perceptron (FMLP) models to other reported methods that have tackled the parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model for benchmark data with a single-peak hydrograph. Using such statistics as the sum of squared deviation, coefficient of efficiency, error of peak discharge and error of time to peak, the FMLP model showed a clear-cut superiority over other methods in flood routing of well-known benchmark data. Further, the FMLP routing model was also proven a promising model for routing real flood hydrographs with multiple peaks of the Chindwin River in northern Myanmar. Unlike other parameter estimation methods, the ANN models directly captured the routing relationship, based on the Muskingum equation and performed well in dealing with complex systems. Because ANN models avoid the complexity of physical processes, the study’s results can contribute to the real time flood forecasting in developing countries, where catchment data are scarce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barati R (2011) Parameter estimation of nonlinear Muskinugm models using the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm. J Hydrol Eng 16(11):946–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barati R (2013) Application of excel solver for parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum models. KSCE J Civil Eng 17(5):1139–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berz G (2000) Flood disasters: lessons from the past—worries for the future. Proceeding of the ICE. Water Mar Eng 142(1):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied Hydrology. McGraw Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu HJ (2009) The Muskingum flood routing model using a neuro-fuzzy approach. KSCE J Civil Eng 13(5):371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu HJ, Chang LC (2009) Applying particle swarm optimization to parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model. J Hydrol Eng 14(9):1024–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A (2004) Parameter estimation for Muskingum models. J Irrig Drain Eng 130(2):140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A (2009) Reverse stream flow routing by using Muskingum models. Sādhanā 34(Part 3):483–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooge JCI (1973) Linear theory of hydrologic systems. Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Technical Bulletin No-1468, Washington D.C

  • Easa SM (2013) New and improved four-parameter non-linear Muskingum model. Water Manag Inst Civil Eng. doi:10.1680/wama.12.00113

    Google Scholar 

  • Geem ZW (2006) Parameter estimation for the nonlinear Muskingum model using the BFGS techniques. J Irrig Drain Eng 132(5):474–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geem ZW (2013) Issues in optimal parameter estimation for the nonlinear Muskingum flood routing model. Eng Optimization. doi:10.1080/0305215X.2013.768242

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill MA (1978) Flood routing by the Muskingum method. J Hydrol 36:353–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2007) Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: an introduction and software implementation. Behav Res Methods 39(4):709–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JH, Geem ZW, Kim ES (2001) Parameter estimation of the non-linear Muskingum model using harmony search. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(5):1131–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latt ZZ, Wittenberg H (2014a) Improving flood forecasting in a developing country: a comparative study of stepwise multiple linear regression and artificial neural network. Water Resour Manag 28(8):2109–2128. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0600-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latt ZZ, Wittenberg H (2014b) Hydrology and flood probability of the monsoon-dominated Chindwin River in northern Myanmar. J Water Clim Chang. doi:10.2166/wcc.2014.075

    Google Scholar 

  • Limsombunchai V, Gan C, Lee M (2004) House price prediction: hedonic price model vs. artificial neural network. Am J Appl Sci 1(3):193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo J, Xie J (2010) Parameter estimation for nonlinear Muskingum model based on immune clonal selection algorithm. J Hydrol Eng 15(10):844–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy GT (1938) The unit hydrograph and flood routing. Proc., Conference of the North Atlantic Division, U.S Army Corps of Engineers, New London, CT

  • Minns AW, Hall MJ (1996) Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Sci 41(3):399–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan S (1997) Parameter estimation of nonlinear Muskingum models using genetic algorithm. J Hydraul Eng 123(2):137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moussa R, Chahinian N (2009) Comparison of different multi-objective calibration criteria using a conceptual rainfall-runoff model of flood events. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:519–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muleta MK (2012) Model performance sensitivity to objective function during automated calibrations. J Hydrol Eng 17(6):756–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell T (1985) A direct three-parameter Muskingum procedure incorporating lateral inflow. Hydrol Sci 30(4):479–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orouji H, Haddad OB, Mehdipour EF, Mariño MA (2013) Estimation of Muskingum parameter by meta-heuristic algorithms. Water Manag Inst Civil Eng 166(6):315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman F, Naseri M (2011) Reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural work. Int J Phys Sci 6(3):434–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Papamichail D, Georgiou P (1994) Parameter estimation of linear and nonlinear Muskingum models for river flood routing. Trans Ecol Environ 7:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy JM, Wilamowski BM (2000) Adaptive neural networks in regulation of river flows. In: Govindaraju RS, Rao AR (eds) Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands, pp 153–177

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, the PDP research group (eds) Parallel distributed processing, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 318–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattari NT, Apaydin H, Ozturk F (2012) Flow estimations for the Sohu stream using artificial neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 66(7):2031–2045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamseldin AY (2010) Artificial neural network model for river flow forecasting in a developing country. J Hydroinf 12(1):22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP, McCANN RC (1980) Some notes on Muskingum method of flood routing. J Hyd 48:343–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapragasam C, Maheswaran R, Venkatesh V (2008) Genetic programming approach for flood routing in natural channels. Hydrol Process 22(5):623–628

  • Stefanon B, Volpe V, Moscardini S, Gruber L (2001) Using artificial neural network to model the urine excretion of total and purine derivative Nitrogen fraction in cows. J Nutr 131(12):3307–3315

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayfur G, Moramarco T, Singh VP (2007) Predicting and forecasting flow discharge at sites receiving significant lateral inflow. Hydrol Process 21(14):1848–1859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirumalaiah K, Deo MC (1998) Real-time flood forecasting using neural networks. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 13:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung Y (1985) River flood routing by nonlinear Muskingum method. J Hydraul Eng 111(12):1447–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinmann PE (1977) Comparison of flood routing methods for natural rivers. Civil Engineering Reports No. 2, Monash University

  • Wilson EM (1974) Engineering Hydrology. MacMillan Education Ltd., Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang CC, Chang LC (2001) Enhanced efficiency of the parameter estimation of Muskingum model using artificial neural network. J Hydrosci Hydraul Eng 19(2):47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Castelli F, Chen Y (2014) Multiobjective sensitivity analysis and optimization of distributed hydrologic model MOBIDIC. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:4101–4112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon J, Padmanabhan G (1993) Parameter estimation of linear and nonlinear Muskingum models. J Water Resour Plan Manag 199(5):600–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD) (German Academic Exchange Service). The Department of Meteorology and Hydrology in Myanmar is also gratefully acknowledged for providing hydrometric data. The author is highly indebted and grateful to Prof. Hartmut Wittenberg for providing academic advices to this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zaw Zaw Latt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latt, Z.Z. Application of Feedforward Artificial Neural Network in Muskingum Flood Routing: a Black-Box Forecasting Approach for a Natural River System. Water Resour Manage 29, 4995–5014 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1100-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1100-1

Keywords

Navigation