Abstract
A new approach is developed based on cooperative games and virtual water concept for quantity-quality assessment of water transfer projects. It is argued that a water transfer project can be executed to satisfy both economic and environmental objectives and needs. In fact, the proposed model evaluate economic, equity, and environment criteria in order to lead to sustainable development. First, an optimization model with economic objective is developed based on virtual water concept that maximizes the net benefit of the inter-basin water transfer. Then, to meet water quality requirements, the impact of decreasing the flow in a sending basin is estimated by using a virtual water quality concept and Nash Equilibrium. Finally, to achieve equity and to retrieve sufficient incentives for water users, cooperative game theory approaches are utilized for the reallocation of net benefits. Effectiveness of the proposed methodology has been examined by applying it to a large scale case study of an inter-basin water transfer in central part of Iran, from the Solakan to the Rafsanjan basins. The results reveal that the proposed methodology could be used as an effective tool for sustainable development in the inter-basin water allocation management with resolving confliction aim with the physical and environmental constraints by considering virtual water concept. In addition, by using cooperative game theory, the net benefit of the project has been realized to be twice the initial allocation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldaya M, Hoekstra A (2010) The water needed for Italians to eat pasta and pizza. Agric Syst 103:351–360
Aldaya MM, Martínez-Santos P, Llamas MR (2010) Incorporating the water footprint and virtual water into policy: reflections from the Mancha Occidental Region, Spain. Water Resour Manag 24:941–958
Allan JA (1997) ‘Virtual water’: a long term solution for water short Middle Eastern economies?
Bulsink F, Hoekstra A, Booij M (2010) The water footprint of Indonesian provinces related to the consumption of crop products. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14
Chapagain A, Hoekstra A (2010) The green, blue and grey water footprint of rice from both a production and consumption perspective
Dabrowski J, Murray K, Ashton P, Leaner J (2009) Agricultural impacts on water quality and implications for virtual water trading decisions. Ecol Econ 68:1074–1082
De Carvalho RC, Magrini A (2006) Conflicts over water resource management in Brazil: a case study of inter-basin transfers. Water Resour Manag 20:193–213
Dehghan Manshadi HR, Niksokhan MH, Ardestani M (2013) Water allocation in inter-basin water transfer with the virtual water approach
Ercin A, Aldaya M, Hoekstra A (2009) A pilot in corporate water footprint accounting and impact assessment: the water footprint of a sugar-containing carbonated beverage
Fahmy H, King P, Wentzel M, Seton J (1994) Economic optimization of river management using genetic algorithms, American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Meeting (USA). no. 94-3020/94-3063
Forgó F, Szép J, Szidarovszky F (1999) Introduction to the theory of games: concepts, methods, applications. Springer, New York
Gallego-Ayala J, Juízo D (2014) Integrating stakeholders’ preferences into water resources management planning in the incomati river basin. Water Resour Manag 28:527–540
Geem ZW (2007) Optimal scheduling of multiple dam system using harmony search algorithm. Comput Ambient Intell 4507:316–323
Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan G (2001) A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76:60–68
Gerbens-Leenes P, Hoekstra A (2009) The water footprint of sweeteners and bio-ethanol from sugar cane, sugar beet and maize
Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading Menlo Park
Hakimian H (2003) Water scarcity and food imports: an empirical investigation of the ‘virtual water’ hypothesis in the MENA region. Rev Middle East Econ Finan 1:71–85
Hoekstra A (2003) Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the international expert meeting on virtual water trade. IHE, Delft
Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. U Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Karamouz M, Mojahedi SA, Ahmadi A (2009) Interbasin water transfer: economic water quality-based model. J Irrig Drain Eng 136:90–98
Karamouz M, Szidarovszky F, Zahraie B, Press C (2003) Water resources systems analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
Ma J, Hoekstra AY, Wang H, Chapagain AK, Wang D (2006) Virtual versus real water transfers within China. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 361:835–842
Madani K (2010) Game theory and water resources. J Hydrol 381:225–238
Mahjouri N, Ardestani M (2010) A game theoretic approach for interbasin water resources allocation considering the water quality issues. Environ Monit Assess 167:527–544
Mahjouri N, Ardestani M (2011) Application of cooperative and non-cooperative games in large-scale water quantity and quality management: a case study. Environ Monit Assess 172:157–169
Mekonnen M, Hoekstra A (2010) A global and high-resolution assessment of the green, blue and grey water footprint of wheat. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discussions 7
Niksokhan MH, Kerachian R, Amin P (2009a) A stochastic conflict resolution model for trading pollutant discharge permits in river systems. Environ Monit Assess 154:219–232
Niksokhan MH, Kerachian R, Karamouz M (2009b) A game theoretic approach for trading discharge permits in rivers. Water Sci Technol 60(3):793–804
Oki T, Kanae S (2004) Virtual water trade and world water resources. Water Sci Technol 49:203–209
Oliveira R, Loucks DP (1997) Operating rules for multireservoir systems. Water Resour Res 33:839–852
Parveen S, Faisal I (2004) Trading virtual water between Bangladesh and India: a politico-economic dilemma. Water Policy 6:549–558
Riche MF, Sinding S, Wirth T, Cohen T, Gibbs S, O’Neill B, Engelman R, Malone E, Madsen EL, Coen A (2009) A pivotal moment: population, justice, and the environmental challenge. Island Press, Washington
Rockström J, Gordon L (2001) Assessment of green water flows to sustain major biomes of the world: implications for future ecohydrological landscape management. Phys Chem Earth Part B: Hydrol Oceans Atmos 26:843–851
Sadegh M, Kerachian R (2011) Water resources allocation using solution concepts of fuzzy cooperative games: fuzzy least core and fuzzy weak least core. Water Resour Manag 25:2543–2573
Tennant DL (1976) Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries 1:6–10
Turton A (1999) Precipitation, people, pipelines and power: towards a ‘virtual water’ based political ecology discourse. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Van Oel P, Mekonnen M, Hoekstra A (2009) The external water footprint of the Netherlands: geographically-explicit quantification and impact assessment. Ecol Econ 69:82–92
Yegnes-Botzer A (2001) Virtual water export from Israel: quantities, driving forces and consequences. IHE, Delft
Young HP, Okada N, Hashimoto T (1982) Cost allocation in water resources development. Water Resour Res 18:463–475
Zhang C, McBean EA, Huang J (2014) A virtual water assessment methodology for cropping pattern investigation. Water Resour Manag 28:2331–2349
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manshadi, H.D., Niksokhan, M.H. & Ardestani, M. A Quantity-Quality Model for Inter-basin Water Transfer System Using Game Theoretic and Virtual Water Approaches. Water Resour Manage 29, 4573–4588 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1076-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1076-x