Skip to main content

A Real-time Flood Monitoring Index Based on Daily Effective Precipitation and its Application to Brisbane and Lockyer Valley Flood Events

Abstract

An objective index for flood monitoring is pragmatic tool for flood early warning systems. This study investigates a novel Flood Index (I F ) based on Effective Precipitation (P E ) for quantifying floods in Brisbane and Lockyer Valley. Using daily precipitation (P) data as an input, the I F was determined by calculating P E using exponentially-decaying time-reduction function considering gradual depletion of water resources over the passage of time and comparing and normalizing the P E per day with the means and standard deviations of yearly maximums in the hydrological period. Start of flood was identified for I F ≥0, severity (I acc F ) assessed by running-sum on consecutively positive I F , duration (D F) as number of days with positive I F and peak danger (I max F ) as maximum I F . The ability of I F for flood warning was verified with river height and discharge rates. The most severe flood was recoded in January 1974 in Brisbane (I acc F =118, I max F =4.4, D F = 104 days) with return period (T) =106.2 years. Next was the December 2010–January 2011 event (I acc F =61.8, I max F =2.6, D F = 89 days) with T = 53 years. For Lockyer Valley, December 2010–January 2011 was the most severe (T = 104.4 years). Consequently, we advocate the practicality of the daily I F for flood risk assessments where severity, peak danger, duration or return periods are to be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 4
Fig 5
Fig 6
Fig 7

Notes

  1. For any given leap year, the P value was added to the P value for March 01st.

References

  • Alexandersson H (1986) A homogeneity test applied to precipitation data. J Climatol 6(6):661–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An G, Kim J (1998) A study on the simulation of runoff hydrograph by using artificial neural network. . Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (In Korean). 31(13–25)

  • Babister M, Retallick M (2011) Brisbane River 2011 Flood Event—Flood Frequency Analysis. Final Report WMA water Submission to Queensland Flood Commission of Inquiry

  • Box P, Thomalla F, Van Den Honert R (2013) Flood risk in Australia: whose responsibility is It, anyway? Water 5(4):1580–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BTRE (2002) Benefits of flood mitigation in Australia. Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics, BTRE, Canberra, 2002

  • Byun H-R, Jung J (1998) Quantified diagnosis of flood possibility by using effective precipitation index. J Korean Water Res Assoc 31(6):657–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Byun H-R, Lee D-K (2002) Defining three rainy seasons and the hydrological summer monsoon in Korea using available water resources index. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 80(1):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byun H-R, Wilhite DA (1999) Objective quantification of drought severity and duration. J Clim 12(9):2747–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous J, Rahman A, Carroll D (2013) Application of monte Carlo simulation technique to design flood estimation: a case study for north Johnstone river in Queensland, Australia. Water Resour Manag 27(11):4099–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, McAneney J (2006) High‐resolution estimates of Australia’s coastal population. Geophys Res Lett 33(16):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Sun J, Chen X (2013) Future changes of drought and flood events in China un-der a global warming scenario. Atmos Oceanic Sci Lett

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology

  • Coates L (1996) An overview of fatalities from some natural hazards in Australia Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction 1996: Conference Proceedings. Institution of Engineers, Australia1996. pp. 49

  • Collier C (2007) Flash flood forecasting: what are the limits of predictability? Q J R Meteorol Soc 133(622):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton R, McAneney J, Chen K, Leigh R, Hunter L (2008) Natural hazards and property loss. Transitions: Pathways Towards Sustainable Urban Development in Australia. 281

  • DNRM (2014) Establishing a new water monitoring site (WM65). version 1.0, Brisbane Qld: State of Queensland (Department of Natural Resources and Mines), Service Delivery

  • Du J, Fang J, Xu W, Shi P (2013) Analysis of dry/wet conditions using the standardized precipitation index and its potential usefulness for drought/flood monitoring in Hunan Province, China. Stoch Env Res Risk A 27(2):377–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleson PS (1972) Dynamics of flood frequency. Water Resour Res 8(4):878–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han SU, Byun HR (2006) The existence and the climatological characteristics of the spring rainy period in Korea. Int J Climatol 26(5):637–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes MJ, Svoboda MD, Wilhite DA, Vanyarkho OV (1999) Monitoring the 1996 drought using the standardized precipitation index. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 80(3):429–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haylock M, Nicholls N (2000) Trends in extreme rainfall indices for an updated high quality data set for Australia, 1910–1998. Int J Climatol 20(13):1533–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huq M (1980) Alice Springs flood study (Technical Report). Dept. of Transport and Works, http://hdl.handle.net/10070/228837

  • Jakeman A, Hornberger G (1993) How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model? Water Resour Res 29(8):2637–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DA, Wang W, Fawcett R (2009) High-quality spatial climate data-sets for Australia. Aust Meteorol Oceanogr J 58(4):233

    Google Scholar 

  • Keogh DU, Apan A, Mushtaq S, King D, Thomas M (2011) Resilience, vulnerability and adaptive capacity of an inland rural town prone to flooding: a climate change adaptation case study of charleville, Queensland, Australia. Nat Hazards 59(2):699–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D-W, Byun H-R (2009) Future pattern of Asian drought under global warming scenario. Theor Appl Climatol 98(1–2):137–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim T-W, Valdés JB, Yoo C (2003) Nonparametric approach for estimating return periods of droughts in arid regions. J Hydrol Eng 8(5):237–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D-W, Byun H-R, Choi K-S (2009) Evaluation, modification, and application of the effective drought index to 200-year drought climatology of Seoul, Korea. J Hydrol 378(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavery B, Joung G, Nicholls N (1997) An extended high-quality historical rainfall dataset for Australia. Aust Meteorol Mag 46(1):27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (1998) Flood simulation with the variation of runoff coefficient in tank model. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (In Korean). 31(3–12)

  • Lee KT, Huang JK (2013) Runoff simulation considering time-varying partial contributing area based on current precipitation index. Journal of Hydrology. 486(443–54)

  • Lu E (2009) Determining the start, duration, and strength of flood and drought with daily precipitation: Rationale. Geophysical research letters. 36(12)

  • Lu E (2012) Monitoring and Maintenance of a Cold-Season Drought Science and Technology Infusion Climate Bulletin NOAA’s National Weather Service, Fort Collins, CO (USA)

  • Lu E et al. (2013) The day-to-day monitoring of the 2011 severe drought in China. Climate Dynamics. 1–9

  • Ma T, Li C, Lu Z, Wang B (2014) An effective antecedent precipitation model derived from the power-law relationship between landslide occurrence and rainfall level. Geomorphology. 216(187–92)

  • McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology. American Meteorological Society Boston, MA 1993. pp. 179–83

  • Middelmann-Fernandes M (2010) Flood damage estimation beyond stage–damage functions: an Australian example. J Flood Risk Manage 3(1):88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCC (2011) Frequent Heavy Rain Events in Late 2010/Early 2011 Lead to Widespread Flooding across Eastern Australia. National Climate Centre, Special Climate Statement, Bureau of Meteorology: Melbourne (Australia)2011.

  • Nosrati K, Saravi M, Shahbazi A (2011) Investigation of flood event possibility over Iran using the flood index. In: Hüseyin G, Umut T, La Moreaux JW (eds) Survival and sustainability: environmental concerns in the 21st century. Springer, Iran, pp 1355–62

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien M (2011) Brisbane Flooding January 2011: An Avoidable Disaster. Submission in Response to Hydraulic Modelling Reports, 31 August 2011

  • Rauf UFA, Zeephongsekul P (2014) Analysis of rainfall severity and duration in Victoria, Australia using Non-parametric copulas and marginal distributions. Water Resour Manag 28(13):4835–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche KM, McAneney KJ, Chen K, Crompton RP (2013) The Australian great flood of 1954: estimating the cost of a similar event in 2011. Weather, Climate, and Soc 5(3):199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiler R, Hayes M, Bressan L (2002) Using the standardized precipitation index for flood risk monitoring. Int J Climatol 22(11):1365–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seqwater (2011) January 2011 Flood Event: Report on the operation of Somerset Dam and Wivenhoe Dam REVIEW OF HYDROLOGICAL ISSUES Queensland Government, Melbourne, Australia, 2011. pp. 77 pp

  • Smith D, Hutchinson M, McArthur R (1993) Australian climatic and agricultural drought: payments and policy. Drought Net News 5(3):11–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppiah R, Hennessy KJ (1998) Trends in total rainfall, heavy rain events and number of dry days in Australia, 1910–1990. Int J Climatol 18(10):1141–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torok S, Nicholls N (1996) A historical annual temperature dataset. Australian Meteorological Magazine. 45(4)

  • Umran Komuscu A (1999) Using the SPI to analyze spatial and temporal patterns of drought in turkey. Drought Net News 1994–2001:49

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Honert RC, McAneney J (2011) The 2011 Brisbane floods: causes, impacts and implications. Water 3(4):1149–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren DP et al. (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change. 109(5–31)

  • Wilhite DA (1996) A methodology for drought preparedness. Nat Hazards 13(3):229–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA, Hayes MJ, Drought planning in the United States: Status and future directions (1998) The arid frontier. Springer 1998. pp. 33–54

  • Wilhite DA, Hayes MJ, Knutson C, Smith KH (2000) Planning for drought: Moving from crisis to risk management1. Wiley Online Library2000

  • Willems P (2000) Compound intensity/duration/frequency-relationships of extreme precipitation for two seasons and two storm types. J Hydrol 233(1):189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo SW (2002) Flooding in Australia: a review of events in 1998. Nat Hazards 25(2):177–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yevjevich V (1991) Tendencies in hydrology research and its applications for 21st century. Water Resour Manag 5(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yevjevich V et al. (1967) An objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts. Colorado State University Fort Collins

  • Yuan WP, Zhou GS (2004) Comparison between standardized precipitation index and Z-index in China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica. 4

Download references

Acknowledgments

The data were acquired from Australian Bureau of Meteorology and Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management Water Monitoring Portal.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravinesh C Deo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 324 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deo, R.C., Byun, HR., Adamowski, J.F. et al. A Real-time Flood Monitoring Index Based on Daily Effective Precipitation and its Application to Brisbane and Lockyer Valley Flood Events. Water Resour Manage 29, 4075–4093 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1046-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1046-3

Keywords

  • Flood risk
  • Flood index
  • Brisbane and lockyer valley floods