This study explains the role and effectiveness of Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approaches for decision support to rank the best option(s) to reconstruct and rehabilitate the inland waterway structure by demonstrating a case study of River Ilmenau in Germany. Considering the involvement of several stakeholders and community with the status and functionality of the Ilmenau river, this paper also considers the importance of stakeholder participation in the decision making process by an intensive stakeholder interview. A total of 27 criteria were selected that represent a wide range of environmental and socio-economic aspects of the Ilmenau River and the activities related to this river. The ranking of the alternatives were performed by combining AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) with PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations) to achieve a rigorous solution of the objective. 23 stakeholders such as decision-makers, experts, and researchers from environmental, administrative, recreational, and socio-economical fields were interviewed to determine the criteria to be weighed. The stakeholders’ opinions showed ecological continuity is one of the most important criteria to be considered. They also gave significant importance to nature protection laws and directives. Among the socio-economic criteria, flood protection was the most important one. Removal of weirs and installation of ground ramps was suggested to be the best option to consider for further investigation and implementation. This study clearly demonstrates the importance of stakeholder and community participation to decision-making process and contributes new information, especially stakeholders’ attitude towards decision making for water resources infrastructure selection.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Barin A, Canha LN, Abaide AR, Magnago KF, Wottrich B, Machado RQ (2011) Multiple criteria analysis for energy storage selection. Energy Power Eng 3(4):557–564
Belton V, Gear T (1983) On a shortcoming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. OMEGA Int J Manag Sci 11(3):228–230
Brans JP (1982) The engineering of decision: Elaboration instruments of decision support method PROMETHEE. Laval University, Quebec, Canada. http://www.dss.dpem.tuc.gr/pdf/How%20to%20Decide
Brans JP, Mareschal B (1994) The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid. Decis Support Syst 12:297–310
Brans JP, Mareschal B (2005) PROMETHEE methods. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis - state of the art surveys. Springer, New York, 163-195pp
Brans JP, Vincke P (1985) A preference ranking organisation method, the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Manag Sci 31(6):647–656
Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24(2):228–238
Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961) Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New York, 467p
Dunning DJ, Ross QE, Markhofer MW (2000) Multi attribute utility analysis; best technology available, adverse environmental impact. Clean water act; Section 316 (b)
Eastman JR, Kyem PAK, Toledano J, Jin W (1993) GIS and decision making. United Nations Institute for Training and Research. Explorations in Geographic Information Systems Technology 4, 112
Edwards W (1977) How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 7:326–340
Feick RD, Hall GB (2004) A method for examining the spatial dimension of multi-criteria weight sensitivity. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 18(8):815–840
Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state-of-the art surveys. Springer. 1048pp
Fontana ME, Morais DC (2013) Using Promethee V to select alternatives so as to rehabilitate water supply with detected leaks. Water Resour Manag 27:4021–4037
Geldermann J, Spengler T, Rentz O (2000) Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study, iron and steel making industry. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115:45–65
Geng G, Wardlaw R (2013) Application of multi-criterion decision making analysis to integrated water resources management. Water Resour Manag 27:3191–3207
Giupponi C (2014) Decision support for mainstreaming climate change adaptation in water resources management. Water Resour Manag 28:4795–4808
Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resources planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553–1566
Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Verghese A, Seage PT, Linkov I (2005) Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1(2):95–108
Luoma-aho V (2010) Emotional stakeholders, A threat to organizational legitimacy? Paper presented at the 60th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Singapore, 22.-26. June, 2010. 1–12
Macharis C, Springael J, De Brucker K, Verbeke A (2004) PROMETHEE and AHP, the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis, strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. Eur J Oper Res 153(2):307–317
Mareschal B (1988) Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid. Eur J Oper Res 33:54–64
NLWKN (2012) Machbarkeitsstudie. Umgestaltung der Bundeswasserstraße Ilmenau unter Beachtung der Anforderungen der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie (WRRL)
PROMETHEE-GAIA (2012) How to choose the right preference function? Web, http://www.promethee-gaia.net/faq-pro/?action=article&cat_id=003002&id=4&lang= (accessed on March 2013)
Rahman MA (2011) Decision support for Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) Project planning to mitigate water scarcity based on non-conventional water resources. PhD Dissertation, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany
Roy B, Bouyssou D (1993) Aide multicritère à la décision, méthodes et cas. Economica, Paris
Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL (2001) Decision making with dependence and feedback, the analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburg
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1991) Prediction, projection and forecasting. Kluwer Academic, Boston
Sharifi MA (2003) Spatial multi criteria decision making. Lecture Notes, ITC, Netherlands
Stewart TJ (1992) A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and praxis. OMEGA Int J Manag Sci 20(5/6):569–586
Store R, Kangas J (2001) Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modeling. Landsc Urban Plan 55:79–93
Wedley WC (1993) Consistency prediction for incomplete AHP matrices. Math Comput Model 17(4/5):151–161
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Wasser- und Schifffahrtsamt (WSA) Lauenburg, Germany for funding the study. Special thanks to Ms. Couzens for her enthusiastic cooperation during the study (August 2012- November 2012).
About this article
Cite this article
Rahman, M.A., Jaumann, L., Lerche, N. et al. Selection of the Best Inland Waterway Structure: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis Approach. Water Resour Manage 29, 2733–2749 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0967-1
- Multicriteria analysis
- Decision support
- Waterway structure
- Ilmenau River