Quantifying Changes in Reconnaissance Drought Index using Equiprobability Transformation Function

Water Resources Management volume 29, pages2451–2469(2015)Cite this article

Abstract

The Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI) is obtained by fitting a lognormal probability density function (PDF) to the ratio of accumulated precipitation over potential evapotranspiration values (αk) at different time scales. This paper aims to address the question of how a probability distribution may fit better to the αk values than a lognormal distribution and how RDI values may change in shorter (i.e.,3-month, and 6-month) and longer (i.e., 9-month, and annual) time scales during 1960–2010 period over various climate conditions (arid, semi-arid, and humid) in Iran. For this purpose, the series of RDI were initially computed by fitting a lognormal PDF to the αk values and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S) test was implemented to choose the best probability function in different window sizes from 3 to 12-months. The corresponding RDI values for the best distribution were then deriven based on an equiprobability transformation function. The differences between RDI values (the lognormal (RDIlog) and the best (RDIApp) distributions) were compared based on Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) criterion. The results of goodness of fit test based on threshold value in the K-S test showed that the goodness of fit in the lognormal distribution may not be rejected at 0.01 and 0.05 significance levels while may only be rejected in a short term (Apr.-Jun.) period at humid station (Rasht station), and three-month (Oct.-Dec. and Apr.-Jun.) and six-month (Apr.-Sep.) periods in semi-arid station (Shiraz station) at significance levels of 0.10 and 0.20, correspondingly. Further a difference between RDIlog and RDIApp performed that RDI values may change if the best distribution employs and this may therefore lead to significant discrepant and/or displacement of drought severity classes in the RDI estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines For Computing Crop Water Requirements, vol 56. FAO Irrigation And Drainage Paper, Rome, p 300

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angelidis P, Maris F, Kotsovinos N, Hrissanthou V (2012) Computation of drought index SPI with alternative distribution functions. Water Resour Manag 26(9):2453–2473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asadi Zarch MA, Malekinezhad H, Mobin MH, Dastorani MT, Kousari MR (2011) Drought monitoring by reconnaissance drought index (RDI) in Iran. Water Resour Manag 25(13):3485–3504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banimahd SA, Khalili D (2013) Factors influencing Markov chains predictability characteristics, utilizing SPI, RDI, EDI and SPEI drought indices in different climatic zones. Water Resour Manag 27(11):3911–3928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dai A (2011) Drought under global warming: a review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2(1):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards DC, Mckee TB (1997) Characteristics of 20th century drought in the United States at multiple time scales. Climatology Report Number 97(2), Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

  7. Etemadi H, Samadi S, Sharifikia M (2014) Uncertainty analysis of statistical downscaling techniques in an arid region. Clim Dyn 42:2899–2920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guttman N (1999) Accepting the standardized precipitation index: a calculation algorithm. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35(2):311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heim RR (2002) A review of twentieth- century drought indices used in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83(8):1149–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kao SC, Govindaraju RS (2010) A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. J Hydrol 380(1–2):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kysely J, Dubrovsky M (2005) Simulation of extreme temperature events by a stochastic weather generator: effects of Interdiurnal and Interannual variability reproduction. Int J Climatol 25:251–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khalili D, Farnoud T, Jamshidi H, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Zand-Parsa SH (2011) Comparability analyses of the SPI and RDI meteorological drought indices in different climatic zones. Water Resour Manag 25:1737–1757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lloyd-Hughes B, Saunders MA (2002) A drought climatology for Europe. Int J Climatol 22:1571–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mckee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Preprints, Eighth Conf. On Applied Climatology, Anaheim, CA, Am Meteorl Soc, 179–184

  15. Mishra AK, Singh VP (2010) A review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391(1–2):202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Binger RL, Harmel RD, Veith T (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morid S, Smakhtin V, Moghaddasi M (2006) Comparison of seven meteorological indices for drought monitoring in Iran. Int J Climatol 26:971–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roseberry AM, Burmaster DE (1992) Lognormal distributions for water intake by children and adults. Risk Anal 12(1):99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Potop V, Soukup J (2009) Spatiotemporal characteristics of dryness and drought in the Republic of Moldova. Theor Appl Climatol 96(3):305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pereira AR, Pruitt WO (2004) Adaptation of the Thornthwaite scheme for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration. Agric Water Manag 66:251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Samadi S, Wilson CAME, Moradkhani H (2013) Uncertainty analysis of statistical downscaling models using Hadley centre coupled model. Theor Appl Climatol 114:673–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Semenov MA, Brooks RJ, Barrow EM, Richardson CW (1998) Comparison of the WGEN and LARS-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse climates. Clim Res 10:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raziei T, Saghafian B, Paulo AA, Pereira, Bordi LS (2009) Spatial patterns and temporal variability of drought in Western Iran. Water Resour Manag 23:439–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tigkas D (2008) Drought characterisation and monitoring in regions of Greece. Eur Water Manag 23(24):29–39

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tsakiris G, Vangelis H (2005) Establishing a drought index incorporating evapotranspiration. Eur Water Manag 9(10):3–11

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tsakiris G, Pangalou D, Vangelis H (2007) Regional drought assessment based on the reconnaissance drought index (RDI). Water Resour Manag 21:821–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsakiris G, Nalbantis I, Pangalou D, Tigkas D, Vangelis H (2008) Drought meteorological monitoring network design for the reconnaissance drought index (RDI). 1st International Conference “Drought Management: Scientific and Technological Innovations”, Zaragoza, Spain, 57–62

  28. Vangelis H, Tigkas D, Tsakiris G (2013) The effect of PET method on reconnaissance drought index (RDI) calculation. J Arid Environ 88:130–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vangelis H, Spiliotis M, Tsakiris G (2011) Drought severity assessment based on bivariate probability analysis. Water Resour Manag 25:357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vicente-Serrano SM, Beguería S, Lopez-Moreno JI (2010) A multi-scalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index – SPEI. J Clim 23(7):1696–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilhite DA, Svoboda MD, Hayes MJ (2007) Understanding the complex impacts of drought: a key to enhancing drought mitigation and preparedness. Water Resour Manag 21(5):763–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu H, Svoboda MD, Hayes MJ, Wilhite DA, Wen F (2007) Appropriate application of the standardized precipitation index in arid locations and dry seasons. Int J Climatol 27:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to Climate Data office at Iranian Meteorological organization for contributing historical insight into the original climatic data records. With the same token, we would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism and fruitful discussions.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Abolfazl Mosaedi

  2. Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

    Hamid Zare Abyaneh & Mohammad Ghabaei Sough

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA

    S. Zahra Samadi

Authors
  1. Abolfazl Mosaedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamid Zare Abyaneh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Ghabaei Sough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Zahra Samadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abolfazl Mosaedi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mosaedi, A., Zare Abyaneh, H., Ghabaei Sough, M. et al. Quantifying Changes in Reconnaissance Drought Index using Equiprobability Transformation Function. Water Resour Manage 29, 2451–2469 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0944-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Reconnaissance drought index (RDI)
  • Equiprobability transformation function
  • Probability density function
  • Drought monitoring