Water Resources Management

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 1843–1857 | Cite as

Multi-objective Optimization of Different Management Scenarios to Control Seawater Intrusion in Coastal Aquifers

  • Akbar JavadiEmail author
  • Mohammed Hussain
  • Mohsen Sherif
  • Raziyeh Farmani


Seawater intrusion (SWI) is a widespread environmental problem, particularly in arid and semi-arid coastal areas. Therefore, appropriate management strategies should be implemented in coastal aquifers to control SWI with acceptable limits of economic and environmental costs. This paper presents the results of an investigation on the efficiencies of different management scenarios for controlling saltwater intrusion using a simulation-optimization approach. A new methodology is proposed to control SWI in coastal aquifers. The proposed method is based on a combination of abstraction of saline water near shoreline, desalination of the abstracted water for domestic consumption and recharge of the aquifer by deep injection of the treated wastewater to ensure the sustainability of the aquifer. The efficiency of the proposed method is investigated in terms of water quality and capital and maintenance costs in comparison with other scenarios of groundwater management. A multi-objective genetic algorithm based evolutionary optimization model is integrated with the numerical simulation model to search for optimal solution of each scenario of SWI control. The main objective is to minimize both the total cost of management process and the total salinity in aquifer. The results indicate that the proposed method is efficient in controlling SWI as it offers the least cost and least salinity in the aquifer.


Seawater intrusion Simulation-optimization Multi-objective genetic algorithm Treated wastewater Management scenarios 


  1. Abd-Elhamid H, Javadi A (2011) A cost-effective method to control seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Manag 25:2755–2780. doi: 10.1007/s11269-011-9837-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asano T, Bahri A (2010) Global challenges to wastewater reclamation and reuse Selections from the 2010 World Water Week in Stockholm:Edited by Jan Lundqvist: 64–72Google Scholar
  3. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Ketabchi H (2011) Elitist continuous ant colony optimization algorithm for optimal management of coastal aquifers. Water Resour Manag 25:165–190. doi: 10.1007/s11269-010-9693-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee P, Singh VS, Chatttopadhyay K, Chandra PC, Singh B (2011) Artificial neural network model as a potential alternative for groundwater salinity forecasting. J Hydrol 398:212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bear J, Zhou Q (2007) Sea water intrusion into coastal aquifers. In: Delleur JW (ed) The handbook of groundwater engineering, 2nd edn. CRC Press,Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 12–1–12–29. doi: 10.1201/9781420006001.ch12 Google Scholar
  6. Bear J, Cheng A, Sorek S, Ouazar D, Herrera I (1999) Seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers concepts, methods and practices. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-2969-7_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benhachmi M, Ouazar D, Naji A, Cheng A, Harrouni K (2003) Pumping optimization in saltwater intruded aquifers by simple genetic algorithm—deterministic model. Paper presented at the 2nd international conference on saltwater intrusion and coastal aquifers-monitoring, modelling and management, Merida-Mexico, 2003Google Scholar
  8. Bhattacharjya R, Datta B (2005) Optimal management of coastal aquifers using linked simulation optimization approach. Water Resour Manag 19:295–320. doi: 10.1007/s11269-005-3180-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattacharjya R, Datta B (2009) ANN-GA-based model for multiple objective management of coastal aquifers. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135:314–322. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:5(314) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhattacharjya R, Datta B, Satish M (2007) Artificial neural networks approximation of density dependent saltwater intrusion process in coastal aquifers. J Hydrol Eng 12:273–282. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:3(273) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bobba AG (1993) Mathematical models for saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Manag 7:3–37. doi: 10.1007/BF00872240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruington AE (1972) Saltwater intrusion into Aquifers1 Jawra. J Am Water Resour Assoc 8:150–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1972.tb05104.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen JJ, Zhou Y, Su ZY, Lin GR, Fu F, Miller P, McCarty D (2003) Tertiary treatment of wastewater for reuse in China. In: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation,Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC), Alexandria-Virginia. Water Environment Federation, pp Session 11 through Session 20:540–556. doi:  10.2175/193864703784756183
  14. Cheng AHD, Halhal D, Naji A, Ouazar D (2000) Pumping optimization in saltwater-intruded coastal aquifers. Water Resour Res 36:2155–2165. doi: 10.1029/2000WR900149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Das A, Datta B (1999) Development of management models for sustainable use of coastal aquifers. J Irrig Drain Eng 125:112–121. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1999)125:3(112) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II evolutionary computation. IEEE Trans 6:182–197. doi: 10.1109/4235.996017 Google Scholar
  17. Dhar A, Datta B (2009) Saltwater intrusion management of coastal aquifers. I: Linked simulation-optimization. J Hydrol Eng 14:1263–1272. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferreira da Silva J, Haie N (2007) Optimal locations of groundwater extractions in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Manag 21:1299–1311. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9082-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gen M, Cheng R (1996) Genetic algorithms and engineering optimization. Wiley, New York. doi: 10.1002/9780470172254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo W, Langevin CD (2002) User’s guide to SEAWAT: a computer program for simulation of three-dimensional variable-density ground-water flow vol Book 6, Chapter A7. Book 6, Chapter A7Google Scholar
  21. Hughes JD, Sanford WE (2004) SUTRA-MS: a version of sutra modified to simulate heat and multiple-solute transport vol 1207. Open-File Report 1207Google Scholar
  22. Javadi AA, Abd-Elhamid HF, Farmani R (2012) A simulation-optimization model to control seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers using abstraction/recharge wells. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 36:1757–1779. doi: 10.1002/nag.1068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kacimov AR, Sherif MM (2006) Sharp interface, one-dimensional seawater intrusion into a confined aquifer with controlled pumping: analytical solution. Water Resour Res 42, W06501. doi: 10.1029/2005WR004551 Google Scholar
  24. Kourakos G, Mantoglou A (2009) Pumping optimization of coastal aquifers based on evolutionary algorithms and surrogate modular neural network models. Adv Water Resour 32:507–521. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kourakos G, Mantoglou A (2011) Simulation and multi-objective management of coastal aquifers in semi-arid regions. Water Resour Manag 25:1063–1074. doi: 10.1007/s11269-010-9677-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin H-CJ, Richards DR, Yeh G-T, Cheng J-R, Cheng H-P (1997) FEMWATER: a three-dimensional finite element computer model for simulating density-dependent flow and transport in variably saturated media. Report CHL-97-12Google Scholar
  27. Lin J, Zhang J, Zheng C, Liu J, Wu J, Yang S (2009) A genetic algorithm based groundwater simulation-optimization model under variable-density conditions, vol 329. IAHS publication, HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  28. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. US Geol Surv (USGS), Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations,. Book 6, Chapter A1Google Scholar
  29. Oude Essink GHP (2001) Improving fresh groundwater supply—problems and solutions. Ocean Coast Manag 44:429–449. doi: 10.1016/S0964-5691(01)00057-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Park CH, Aral MM (2004) Multi-objective optimization of pumping rates and well placement in coastal aquifers. J Hydrol 290:80–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.11.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patel AS, Shah DL (2008) Water management: conservation, harvesting and artificial recharge. New age international (p) limited, publishersGoogle Scholar
  32. Qahman K, Larabi A, Ouazar D, Naji A, Cheng AH-D (2009) Optimal extraction of groundwater in gaza coastal aquifer. J Water Resour Prot 1:249–259. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2009.14030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rao SVN, Sreenivasulu V, Bhallamudi SM, Thandaveswara BS, Sudheer KP (2004) Planning groundwater development in coastal aquifers / Planification du développement de la ressource en eau souterraine des aquifères côtiers. Hydrol Sci J 49:155–170. doi: 10.1623/hysj. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sherif M, Hamza K (2001) Mitigation of seawater intrusion by pumping brackish water. Transp Porous Media 43:29–44. doi: 10.1023/A:1010601208708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sherif MM, Singh VP, Amer AM (1990a) A note on saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Water Resour Manag 4:123–134. doi: 10.1007/BF00429801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sherif MM, Singh VP, Amer AM (1990b) A sensitivity analysis of ‘2D-FED’, a model for seawater encroachment in leaky coastal aquifers. J Hydrol 118:343–356. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(90)90267-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sreekanth J, Datta B (2010) Multi-objective management of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers using genetic programming and modular neural network based surrogate models. J Hydrol 393:245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Todd DK (1974) Salt-water intrusion and its control. J Am Water Works Assoc (AWWA) 66:180–187Google Scholar
  39. Van Dam JC (1983) The shape and position of the salt water wedge in coastal aquifers. In: Proceedings of the Hamburg symposium on relation of groundwater quantity and quality. IAHS Publication, Hamburg 59–75Google Scholar
  40. Voss CI (1984) A finite-element simulation model for saturated-unsaturated, fluid-density-dependent ground-water flow with energy transport or chemically-reactive single-species solute transport. Report 84–4369Google Scholar
  41. Voss CI, Provost AM (2010) SUTRA-A model for saturated-unsaturated variable-density ground-water flow with solute or energy transport. Report 02–4231Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akbar Javadi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohammed Hussain
    • 1
  • Mohsen Sherif
    • 2
  • Raziyeh Farmani
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Engineering, Computer Science and MathematicsUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  2. 2.Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringUAE UniversityAl AinUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations