Abstract
Sensitivity analysis of reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) in Iran is an important necessity due to better management of water in such an arid and semi-arid country. It is important to analyze the sensitivity of ET0 to weather parameters as climate seems to be changed to some degree everywhere. In this study, sensitivity of ET0 to climatic variables at the eight selected stations of Iran was investigated. To estimate the ET0, the most recommended form of the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith method was used. Sensitivity of ET0 was analyzed in terms of change in mean air temperature (Tmean), actual vapor pressure (ea), wind speed (u2) and net solar radiation (Rn) within a range of ±20 %, in 5 % steps, from their corresponding normal long-term values (1965–2005). Results showed that ET0 was most sensitive to Tmean at the six of the stations in annual time scale. Increase in Tmean by +20 %, caused the most increase in ET0 at Chabahar. In contrast ET0 was least sensitive to ea in most selected stations. In this study, we investigated the interaction parameters in different scenarios on ET0 at all stations in monthly and annual time scale. Results showed in annual time scale increasing Tmean and WS by 20 % and decreasing ea by 20 % yielded ET0 increasing 36.4 % at Chabahar. But, in monthly time scale 10 % increase in Tmean and WS as well as 10 % decrease in Rn yielded ET0 to be increase to about 30.5 % in December at Bandar Anzali.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen RG, Perevia LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy
Bakhtiari B, Liaghat AM (2011) Seasonal sensitivity analysis for climatic variables of ASCE-Penman-Monteith model in the semi-arid climate. J Agric Sci Technol 13:1135–1145
Beven K (1979) A sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration estimates. J Hydrol 44:169–190
Blaney HF, Criddle WD (1950) Determining water requirements in irrigated areas from climatological and irrigation data. USDA SCS-TP-96, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington. D.C
Dinpashoh Y (2006) Study of reference crop evapotranspiration in I. R. of Iran. Agri Water Manage 84:123–129
Dinpashoh Y, Fakheri-fard A, Moghaddam M, Jahanbakhsh S, Marina M (2004) Selection of variables for the purpose of regionalization of Iran’s precipitation climate using multivariate methods. J Hydrol 197:109–123
Dinpashoh Y, Jhajharia D, Fakheri-fard A, Singh VP, Kahya E (2011) Trend analysis of reference crop evapotranspiration in Iran. J Hydrol 399:422–433
Eslamian S, Khordadi MJ, Abedi-Koupai J (2011) Effects of variations in climatic parameters on evapotranspiration in the arid and semi-arid regions. Glob Planet Chang 78:188–194
Estévez J, Gavilán P, Berengena J (2009) Sensitivity analysis of a Penman-Monteith type equation to estimate reference evapotranspiration in southern Spain. Hydrol Process 23:3342–3353
Gong L, Xu CY, Chen D, Halldin S, Chen YD (2006) Sensitivity of the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang (Yangtze river) basin. J Hydrol 329:620–629
Goyal RK (2004) Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to global warming: A case study of arid zone of Rajasthan (India). Agri Water Manag 69:1–11
Irmak S, Payero JO, Martin DL, Irmak A, Howell TA (2006) Sensitivity analyses and sensitivity coefficients of standardized daily ASCE-Penman-Monteith equation. J Irrig and Drain Engin 132(6):564–578
Itenfisu D, Elliot RL, Allen RG, Walter IA (2003) Comparison of reference evapotranspiration calculations as part of the ASCE standardization effort. J Irrig and Drain Eng 129(6):440–448
Kite GW, Droogers P (2000) Comparing evapotranspiration estimates from satellites, hydrological models and field data. J Hydrol 229:3–18
Ley TW, Hill RW, Jensen DT (1994) Errors in Penman-Wright alfalfa refrence evapotranspiration estimates. Transe ASAE 37(6):1863–1870
Liu Q, Yang Z, Cui B, Sun T (2010) The temporal trends of reference evapotranspiration and its sensitivity to key meteorological variables in the Yellow River basin, China. Hydrol Process 24:2171–2181
McCuen RH (1973) The role of sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modeling. J Hydrol 18:37–53
Rana G, Katerji N (1998) A measurement based sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration model for crops of different height and in contrasting water status. Theor Appl Climatol 60:141–149
Rana G, Katerji N (2000) Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration in the field under Mediterranean climate: a review. Eur J Agron 13:125–153
Saxton KE (1975) Sensitivity analyses of the combination evapotranspiration equation. Agri Meteor 15:343–353
Singh VP, Xu CY (1997) Sensitivity of mass transfer-based evaporation equations to errors in daily and monthly input data. Hydrol Process 11:1465–1473
Zhang X, Kang S, Zhang L, Liu J (2010) Spatial variation of climatology monthly crop reference evapotranspiration and sensitivity coefficients in Shiyang river basin of northwest Chain. Agri Water Manag 97:1506–1516
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharifi, A., Dinpashoh, Y. Sensitivity Analysis of the Penman-Monteith reference Crop Evapotranspiration to Climatic Variables in Iran. Water Resour Manage 28, 5465–5476 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0813-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0813-x