Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the Performance of Eight Record-Extension Techniques Under Different Levels of Association, Presence of Outliers and Different Sizes of Concurrent Records: A Monte Carlo Study

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, eight record extension techniques were described, their properties were explored, and their performances were examined and compared. The eight record extension techniques are the Ordinary least-squares regression (OLS), Kendall-Theil robust line (KTRL), Maintenance of variance extension techniques (MOVE1, MOVE2, MOVE3, and MOVE4), and two recently developed techniques, the modified KTRL (KTRL2), and the robust line of organic correlation (RLOC). The two recently proposed techniques have the advantages of being robust in the presence of outliers, and they are able to maintain the variance in the extended records. Monte-Carlo experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of the eight record extension techniques under different levels of data contamination (presence of outliers), different sizes of concurrent records, and different levels of association. The performance of the eight techniques was examined for bias, and standard error of: individual records, moment estimates, and the full range of percentiles. Results showed that for individual record estimates, with uncontaminated data (no outliers), OLS, MOVE3 and MOVE4 provide comparable results and outperform the other techniques under any level of association or size of concurrent records. However, under any level of data contamination, the KTRL outperforms other techniques, for the estimation of individual records, under any level of association or size of concurrent records. In the case of uncontaminated data, MOVE techniques, RLOC and KTRL2 were almost similar and outperform OLS and KTRL in preserving the characteristics of the entire distribution, while MOVE techniques were slightly more precise than RLOC and KTRL2 for small sizes of concurrent records. However, under any level of contaminated data, RLOC and KTRL2 outperform other techniques in preserving the characteristics of the entire distribution, under any level of association and/ or size of concurrent records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albek E (2003) Estimation of point and diffuse contaminant loads to streams by non-parametric regression analysis of monitoring data. Water Air Soil Poll 147:229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Déry SJ, Mlynowski TJ, Hernandez-Henriquez MA, Straneo F (2011) Interannual variability and interdecadal trends in Hudson Bay streamflow. J Mar Syst 88:341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N.R. and H. Smith: Applied regression analysis, John Wiley, New York, p. 736, 1966.

  • Göncü S, Albek E (2010) Modeling climate change effects on streams and reservoirs with HSPF. Water Resour Manag 24:707–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granato, G.E.: Kendall-Theil Robust Line (KTRLine - version 1), A visual basic program for calculating and graphing robust nonparametric estimates of linear-regression coefficients between two continuous variables: Techniques and Methods of the U.S. Geological Survey, Book 4, chap. A7, 31 p., 2006

  • Hadzima-Nyarko M, Rabi A, Šperac M (2014) Implementation of artificial neural networks in modeling the water-air temperature relationship of the River Drava. Water Resour Manag 28(5):1379–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (2002) Statistical methods in water resources. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 522 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch RM (1982) A comparison of four streamflow record extension techniques. Water Resour Res 18(4):1081–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch RM, Alexander R, Smith RA (1991) Selection of methods for the detection and estimation of trends in water quality. Water Resour Res 27(5):803–813

  • Jia Y, Culver TB (2006) Bootstrapped artificial neural networks for synthetic flow generation with a small data sample. J Hydrol 2006(331):580–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil B, Adamowski J (2012) Record-extension for short gauged water quality parameters using a newly proposed robust version of the line of organic correlation technique. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:2253–2266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil B, Ouarda TBMJ, St-Hilaire A, Chebana F (2010) A statistical approach for the rationalization of water quality indicators in surface water quality monitoring networks. J Hydrol 386:173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil B, Ouarda TBMJ, St-Hilaire A (2011) Estimation of water quality characteristics at ungauged sites using artificial neural networks and canonical correlation analysis. J Hydrol 405:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil B, Ouarda TBMJ, St-Hilaire A (2012) Comparison of record-extension techniques for water quality variables. Water Resour Manag 26(14):4259–4280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousari MR, Dastorani MT, Niazi Y, Soheili E, Hayatzadeh M, Chezgi J (1857–1872) Trend Detection of Drought in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions of Iran Based on Implementation of Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI) and Application of Non-Parametrical Statistical Method. Water Resour Manag 28(7):2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis, D. and A. Langousis: Precipitation, Treatise on Water Science, edited by P. Wilderer and S. Uhlenbrook, 2, 27-28, Academic Press, Oxford, 2011

  • Matalas NC, Jacobs B (1964) A correlation procedure for augmenting hydrologic data. US Geol Survey Prof Paper 434-E:E1–E7

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog DB, Whiting PJ (1999) Streamflow record extension using power transformations and application to sediment transport. Water Resour Res 35(1):243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M.A. and J.V. Bonta (2008) Development of duration-curve based methods for quantifying variability and change in watershed hydrology and water quality, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-08/065

  • Nevitt J, Tam HP (1998) A comparison of robust and nonparametric estimators under the simple linear regression model. Multi Linear Reg View 25:54–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson O, Gassmann M, Wegerich K, Bauer M (2010) Identification of the effective water availability from streamflows in the Zerafshan river basin, Central Asia. J Hydrol 390:190–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raziei T, Saghafian B, Paulo AA, Pereira LS, Bordi I (2009) Spatial patterns and temporal variability of drought in western Iran. Water Resour Manag 23:439–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raziei T, Bordi I, Pereira LS (2011) An application of GPCC and NCEP/NCAR datasets for draught variability analysis in Iran. Water Resour Manag 25:1075–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson RB, Wood MS, Smoot JL, Moore SE (2004) Parametric modelling of water quality and sampling strategy in a high-altitude Appalachian stream. J Hydrol 287:62–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu JH, Svoboda MD, Lenters JD, Tadesse T, Knutson CL (2010) Potential extents for ENSO-driven hydrologic drought forecasts in the United States. Clim Chang 101:575–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil H.: A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis, 1, 2, and 3: Ned. Akad. Wentsch Proc., 53, 386-392, 521-525, and 1397-1412, 1950

  • Vogel RM, Stedinger JR (1985) Minimum variance streamflow record augmentation procedures. Water Resour Res 21(5):715–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by an FQRNT Postdoctoral Fellowship held by Bahaa Khalil, and an NSERC Discovery Grant held by Jan Adamowski.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahaa Khali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khali, B., Adamowski, J. Evaluation of the Performance of Eight Record-Extension Techniques Under Different Levels of Association, Presence of Outliers and Different Sizes of Concurrent Records: A Monte Carlo Study. Water Resour Manage 28, 5139–5155 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0799-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0799-4

Keywords

Navigation