Skip to main content
Log in

Design of Sprinkler Irrigation Subunit of Minimum Cost with Proper Operation. Application at Corn Crop in Spain

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MATLAB software named PRESUD (Pressurized Subunit Design) was developed to identify the optimum solid set sprinkler irrigation subunit design with a criterion of minimizing the annual water application cost (CT). This CT is defined as the cost per cubic meter of water applied to the soil for crop use. In this study, only rectangular subunits are considered, using an iterative method for calculating the lateral and manifold pipelines. The results indicate that water cost (Cw), which includes the investment and operation costs for pumping water from the source to the subunit inlet, makes up 75 % of CT. Another important factor is energy cost, which comprises 14 % of CT. The remaining variables, such as sprinkler spacing and layout, or application rate (ARa), have a lower impact on CT. In cases of use groundwater, the proportion of energy cost in CW can reach 40 %; thus, energy is an important part of CT. Results shows that the criterion of limiting the maximum difference in pressure heads in the irrigation subunit (Δh < 20 %), widely used when designing a sprinkler irrigation subunit, does not always lead to a minimum CT, and the use of tools such as PRESUD can help obtain better solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brennan D (2008) Factors affecting the economic benefits of sprinkler uniformity and their implications for irrigation water use. Irrig Sci 26:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrión F, Tarjuelo JM, Hernández D, Moreno MA (2013) Design of microirrigation subunit of minimum cost with proper operation. Irrig Sci. doi:10.1007/s00271-013-0399-8

    Google Scholar 

  • ESYRCE (Encuesta sobre Superficies y Rendimientos de Cultivos) 2011. Análisis de los Regadíos Españoles. Ministerio de Agricultura Alimentación y Medio Ambiente http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/estadistica/temas/estadisticas-agrarias/Regadios2011MAMA_tcm7-188400.pdf

  • Kang Y, Nishiyama S (1996) Analysis and design of microirrigation laterals. J Irrig Drain Eng 122(2):75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmeli D, Keller J (1975) Trickle irrigation design. Rain Bird Sprinkler Manufacturing Corp, Glendora, 133p

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller J, Bliesner RD (1990) Trickle irrigation. “Sprinkler and trickle irrigation”. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 427–582

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni SA, Reinders FB, Ligetvari F (2006) Global scenario of sprinkler and micro irrigated areas. ICID, Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Heatwole CD, Ross BB, Taylor B (1992) Cost models for preliminary economic evaluation of sprinkler irrigation systems. J Irrig Drain Eng 118(5):757–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis M, Selker J (2000) Sprinkler head maintenance effects on water application uniformity. J Irrig Drain Eng 126(3):142–48, ASCE

  • Martín de Santa Olalla FJ, Calera A, Domínguez A (2003) Monitoring irrigation water use by combining Irrigation Advisory Service, and remotely sensed data with a geographic information system. Agric Water Manag 61(2):111–124

  • Martinez-Cob A, Playan E, Zapata N, Cavero J, Medina ET, Puig M (2008) Contribution of evapotranspiration reduction during sprinkler irrigation to application efficiency. J Irrig Drain Eng 134:745–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo T (2007) Riego localizado. Diseño de instalaciones, Ediciones VJ, Valencia, Spain (in Spanihs)

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero J, Tarjuelo J, Carrión P (2001) SIRIAS: a Simulation Model for Sprinkler Irrigation. PART II. Calibration and Validation of the Model. Irrig Sci 20:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno MA, Ortega JF, Córcoles JI, Martínez A, Tarjuelo JM (2010) Energy analysis of irrigation delivery systems: monitoring and evaluation of proposed measures for improving energy efficiency. Irrig Sci 28:445–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega JF, de Juan JA, Tarjuelo JM (2005). Improving water management: The irrigation advisory service of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). Agric Water Manag 77:37–58

  • Ortiz JN, Tarjuelo JM, de Juan JA (2009) Characterisation of evaporation and drift losses with centre pivots. Agric Water Manag 96:1541–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz JN, de Juan JA, Tarjuelo JM (2010) Analysis of water application uniformity from a centre pivot and its effect on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield. Biosyst Eng 105(3):367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Playán E, Salvador R, Faci JM, Zapata N, Martínez-Cob A, Sánchez I (2005) Day and night wind drift and evaporation losses in sprinkler solid-sets and moving laterals. Agric Wat Manag 76:139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, T, and Weigel J (1993) “Planning to irrigate … A checklist.”NDSU Extension Service, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, N.D. _http://www.ext.nodak.edu/extpubs/ageng/-irrigate/ae91w.htm__March 21, 2012_.

  • Tarjuelo JM, Montero J, Valiente M, Honrubia FT, Ortiz J (1999a) Irrigation uniformity with medium size sprinklers. Part I. Characterization of water distribution in no-wind conditions”. Trans ASAE 42(3):665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarjuelo JM, Montero J, Carrión PA, Honrubia FT, Calvo MA (1999b) Irrigation Uniformity with Medium Size Sprinklers. Part II. Influence of wind and other factors on water distribution”. Trans ASAE 42(3):677–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarjuelo JM, Ortega JF, Montero J, De Juan JA (2000) Modelling evaporation and drift losses in irrigation with medium size impact sprinklers under semi-arid conditions”. Agric Water Manag 43:263–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarjuelo JM, de Juan JA, Moreno MA, Ortega JF (2010) Water resources deficit and water engineering. Span J Agric Res 8(S2):102–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Gulik T (2003) Irrigation equiment cost. Ministry of Agricultural and food, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood M, Wang QJ, Bethune M (2007) An economic analysis of conversion from border-check to centre pivot irrigation on dairy farms in the Murray Dairy Region, Australia. Irrig Sci 26:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (MEC), for funding the PET2008_0175_02, and AGL2011-30328-C02-01 projects (Co-funded by FEDER).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A Moreno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carrión, F., Montero, J., Tarjuelo, J.M. et al. Design of Sprinkler Irrigation Subunit of Minimum Cost with Proper Operation. Application at Corn Crop in Spain. Water Resour Manage 28, 5073–5089 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0793-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0793-x

Keywords

Navigation