Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 28, Issue 14, pp 4971–4984 | Cite as

Design of Managed Aquifer Recharge for Agricultural and Ecological Water Supply Assessed Through Numerical Modeling

  • Jacob Scherberg
  • Troy Baker
  • John S. Selker
  • Rick Henry
Article

Abstract

The Walla Walla Basin, in Eastern Oregon and Washington, USA, faces challenges in sustaining an agricultural water supply while maintaining sufficient flow in the Walla Walla River for endangered fish populations. Minimum summer river flow of 0.71 m3/s is required, forcing irrigators to substitute groundwater from a declining aquifer for lost surface water diversion. Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) was initiated in 2004 attempting to restore groundwater levels and improve agricultural viability. The Integrated Water Flow Model (IWFM) was used to compute surface and shallow groundwater conditions in the basin under water management scenarios with varying water use, MAR, and allowable minimum river flow. A mean increase of 1.5 m of groundwater elevation, or 1.5 % of total aquifer storage, was predicted over the model area when comparing maximum MAR and no MAR scenarios where minimum river flow was increased from current level. When comparing these scenarios a 53 % greater summer flow in springs was predicted with the use of MAR. Results indicate MAR can supplement irrigation supply while stabilizing groundwater levels and increasing summer streamflow. Potential increase in long-term groundwater storage is limited by the high transmissivity of the aquifer material. Increased MAR caused increased groundwater discharge through springs and stream beds, benefiting aquatic habitat rather than building long-term aquifer storage. Judicious siting of recharge basins may be a means of increasing the effectiveness of MAR in the basin.

Keywords

Managed aquifer recharge Hydrological modeling Habitat restoration Groundwater management Agricultural water supply Salmon 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the generous support received from the Walla Walla Basin Watershed Council, Bob Bower, Richard Cuenca, IWFM developer Can Dogrul, Aristides Petrides, the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, the Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station, the Oregon Department of Water Resources, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Washington Department of Ecology.

References

  1. Alley W, Leake S (2004) The journey from safe yield to sustainability. Ground Water 42(1):12–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker T (2009) Seasonal seepage assessments, Walla Walla Basin Watershed CouncilGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow P, Leake S, (2012) Streamflow depletion by wells—Understanding and managing the effects of groundwater pumping on streamflow: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1376, 84 p. http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1376
  4. Bower B, Lindsey K (2010) Aquifer Recharge as a Water Management Tool: Hudson Bay Recharge Testing Site Final Report (2004–2009), Walla Walla Basin Watershed CouncilGoogle Scholar
  5. Bredehoeft J (2002) The water budget myth revisited: why hydrogeologists model. Ground Water 40(4):340–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Khan S, Rana T, Abbas A, Buettikofer H (2012) Three dimensional conceptualization of hydrogeological environment to underpin groundwater management in irrigation area. Water Resour Manag 26(11):3077–3093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole D (2012) Aquifer Storage and Recovery Fact Sheet, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/pubs/factsheets/groundwater/AquiferStorageRecovery.pdf
  8. Devlin JF, Sophocleous M (2005) The persistence of the water budget myth and its relationship to sustainability. Hydrogeol J 13:549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dogrul, EC (2013) Integrated Water Flow Model (IWFM v3.02): Theoretical documentation. Sacramento(CA): Central Valley Modeling Unit, Modeling Support Branch, Bay-Delta Office, California Department of Water ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  10. Fleckenstein J, Anderson M, Fogg G (2001) Managing surface water-groundwater to restore fall flows in the Cosumnes River. J Water Resour Plan Manag 4:301–310Google Scholar
  11. Fleckenstein J, Niswonger RG, Fogg GE (2006) River-aquifer interactions, geologic heterogeneity, and low-flow management. Ground Water 44:837–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Henry R, Lindsey K, Wolcott B, Patten S, Baker T (2013) Walla Walla Basin Recharge Strategic Plan, Walla Walla Basin Watershed CouncilGoogle Scholar
  13. Hunt RJ, Wilcox DA (2005) Ecohydrology-why hydrologists should care. Ground Water 41:289Google Scholar
  14. Lin HT, Ke KY, Tan YC, Wu SC, Hsu G, Chen PC, Fang ST (2013) Estimating pumping rates and identifying potential recharge zones for groundwater management in multi-aquifers system. Water Resour Manag 27(9):3293–3306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindsey K (2007) Geologic Setting of the Miocene to Recent Suprabasalt Sediments of the Walla Walla Basin, Southeastern Washington and Northeastern Oregon, Walla Walla Basin Watershed Council Washington Department of EcologyGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahoney B, Mendel G, Weldert R, Trump J, Olsen J, Gembala M, Gallinat M, Ross L (2011) The Walla Walla Sub-Basin Salmonid Monitoring and Evaluation Project: 2009 and 2010 Annual Report, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and Washington Department of Fish and WildlifeGoogle Scholar
  17. Mendel G, Trump J, Gembala M (2005) Assessment of Salmonids and Their Habitat Conditions in the Walla Walla River Basin within Washington: 2004 Annual Report, Bonneville Power AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  18. Metcalf BE (2004) Monitoring of Groundwater and Surfacewater Interactions on the Walla Walla River, Oregon for the Purpose of Restoring In-stream Flows for ESA Listed Fish Habitat. MS Thesis, Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  19. Morgan L (2005) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas: Guidance Document, Washington State Department of EcologyGoogle Scholar
  20. Newcomb RC (1965) Geology and Ground-water Resources of the Walla Walla River Basin, Washington-Oregon, State of Washington Dept. of Conservation-Division of Water ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  21. Patten S (2010) Shallow Aquifer Monitoring in the Walla Walla Basin, Walla Walla Basin Watershed CouncilGoogle Scholar
  22. Petrides A (2012) Managed Aquifer Recharge and Hydrological Studies in the Walla Walla Basin to Improve River and Aquifer Conditions. Doctoral Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, ORGoogle Scholar
  23. Pliakas F, Petalas C, Diamantis I, Kallioris A (2005) Modeling of groundwater artificial recharge by reactivating an old stream bed. Water Resour Manag 19(3):279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scherberg J (2012) The Development of a Hydrological Model of the Walla Walla Basin Using Integrated Water Flow Model. MS Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, ORGoogle Scholar
  25. USDFW (U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife) (2002) U.S. Fish and Wildlife vs. Hudson Bay District Improvement Company, Walla Walla River Irrigation District, and Gardena Farms Irrigation District #13Google Scholar
  26. Ward J, Dillon P (2012) Principals to coordinate managed aquifer recharge with natural resource management policies in Australia. Hydrogeol J 20(5):943–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolcott B (2010) Little Walla Walla River Assessment and Initial Action Plan, Walla Walla Basin Watershed CouncilGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhou Y (2009) A critical review of groundwater budget myth, safe yield and sustainability. J Hydrol 370(1–4):207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob Scherberg
    • 1
  • Troy Baker
    • 2
  • John S. Selker
    • 3
  • Rick Henry
    • 2
  1. 1.GeoSystems Analysis, Inc.Hood RiverUSA
  2. 2.Walla Walla Basin Watershed CouncilMilton-FreewaterUSA
  3. 3.Oregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations