Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Compromise Programming Based Model for Augmenting Food Production with Minimum Water Allocation in a Watershed: a Case Study in the Indian Himalayas

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A compromise programming based model has been developed for maximizing food production with minimum allocation of available water at watershed scale after meeting human, livestock and environmental needs under different scenarios. Agricultural water allocation in conjunction with available land resources under a set of constraints has been examined. The formulated model has the potential to analyze the implications of water availability on agricultural water allocation plans, and consequently food production. A case study in Indian Himalayan region, where despite abundant availability of water, rainfed agriculture is mostly practiced by majority of farmers with a primary objective of self-sufficiency in food production, well demonstrates the applicability of the developed model. Three distinct scenarios affecting water availability were considered. Analysis of imposition of fixed mandatory outflows of 20 to 70 % (as per water source) for satisfying environmental needs with present production mix revealed water scarcity within the study watershed ranging from 4 to 66 % across various quarters of an year, which necessitates optimum utilization of rainfed fallow land by allocating it to high value crops ginger and lentil (6 to 32 times more than existing allocation) on one hand, and drastic reduction (76 to 100 %) of area under all irrigated crops (except onion with 4–6 times increase) on the other, to achieve the conflicting objectives. The compromise plans also suggested increase (by 14 % in environmental watershed scenario) or decrease (by 29 % in degraded watershed scenario) in size of livestock population as per scenario based water availability. Overall, the compromise plans were successful in achieving a high percentage (>93 %) of ideal values of the objective functions, which were 155 to 170 % of existing food production and 71 to 85 % of existing water utilization across the scenarios. The proposed optimization model has the potential for application in identical agro-climatic settings to enhance food production in an environmental friendly manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrishamchi A, Ebrahimian A, Tajrishi M et al (2005) Case study: application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply. J Water Resour Plan Manag 131(4):326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D et al. (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0490E/x0490e00.htm. Accessed 2 February 2009

  • Anonymous (2006) Editorial: scenario-based studies of future land use in Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babel MS, Dasgupta A, Nayak DK (2005) A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands. Water Resour Manag 19(6):693–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banskota M, Chalise SR (2000) Waters of life: perspectives of water harvesting in the Hindu-Kush Himalayas. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal 101p

  • Bharati L, Rodgers C, Erdenberger T et al (2008) Integration of economic and hydrologic models: exploring conjunctive irrigation water use strategies in the Volta Basin. Agric Water Manag 95(8):925–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang NB, Wen CG, Wu SL (1995) Optimal management of environmental and land resources in a reservoir watershed by multi-objective programming. J Environ Manag 44(2):145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cong ZT, Yang DW, Gao B et al (2009) Hydrological trend analysis in the Yellow river basin using a distributed hydrological model. Water Resour Res 45: Article no. W00A13

  • de Fraiture C, Wichelns D (2010) Satisfying future water demands for agriculture. Agric Water Manag 97(4):502–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Fraiture C, Molden D, Wichelns D (2010) Investing in water for food, ecosystems, and livelihoods: an overview of the comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Agric Water Manag 97(4):495–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1975) Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24, Rome. http://www.fao.org/ag/AGL/aglw/cropwater/docs/chap2.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2009

  • Evans EM, Lee DR, Boisvert RN et al (2003) Achieving efficiency and equity in irrigation management: an optimization model of the El Angel watershed, Carchi, Ecuador. Agric Syst 77(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M (2007) Shift in thinking to address the 21st century hunger gap, moving focus from blue to green water management. Water Resour Manag 21(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi P, Fayyaz S (2010) A compromise programming model to integrated urban water management. Water Resour Manag 24(6):1211–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaiser T, Printz A, von Raumer HGS et al (2008) Development of a regional model for integrated management of water resources at the basin scale. Phys Chem Earth 33(1–2):175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg NK, Hassan Q (2007) Alarming scarcity of water in India. Curr Sci 93(7):932–941

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebrezgabher SA, Meuwissen MPM, Lansink AGJMO (2014) A multiple criteria decision making approach to manure management systems in the Netherlands. Eur J Oper Res 232(3):643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng G, Wardlaw R (2013) Application of multi-criterion decision making analysis to integrated water resources management. Water Resour Manag 27(8):3191–3207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh BN, Dogra P, Bhattacharyya R et al (2012) Effects of grass vegetation strips on soil conservation and crop yield under rainfed conditions in the Indian sub-Himalayas. Soil Use Manag 28(4):635–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo P, Huang GH, He L et al (2009) Interval-parameter two-stage stochastic semi-infinite programming: application to water resources management under uncertainty. Water Resour Manag 23(5):1001–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21(9):1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Higgins A (2008) A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur J Oper Res 184(1):255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Xu SG, Xu XZ (2008) Modeling multisource multiuser water resources allocation. Water Resour Manag 22(7):911–923

  • Han Y, Huang YF, Wang GQ et al (2011) A multi-objective linear programming model with interval parameters for water resources allocation in Dalian city. Water Resour Manag 25(2):449–463

  • Higgins AJ, Archer A, Hajkowicz S (2008) A stochastic non-linear programming model for a multiperiod water resource allocation with multiple objectives. Water Resour Manag 2(10):1445–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hincal O, Altan-Sakarya AB, Ger AM (2011) Optimization of multi reservoir systems by genetic algorithm. Water Resour Manag 25(5):1465–1487

  • Hoff H, Falkenmark M, Gerten D et al (2010) Greening the global water system. J Hydrol 384(3–4):177–186

  • Kumar R, Singh RD, Sharma KD (2005) Water resources of India. Curr Sci 89(5):794–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP (2000) Sustainable water resources management. Water Int 25(1):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu HW, Huang GH, Zeng GM et al (2008) An inexact two-stage fuzzy-stochastic programming model for water resources management. Water Resour Manag 22(8):991–1016

  • Lu HW, Huang GH, He L (2012) Simulation-based inexact rough-interval programming for agricultural irrigation management: a case study in the Yongxin county, China. Water Resour Manag 26(14):4163–4182

  • Messerli B, Ives JD (1997) Mountains of the world—a global priority. The Parthenon Publishing Group, New York, p 495

  • Molden D (ed) (2007) Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan, London and International Water Management Institute, Colombo

  • Nazer DW, Tilmant A, Mimi Z et al (2010) Optimizing irrigation water use in the West Bank, Palestine. Agric Water Manag 97(2):339–345

  • NCIWRD (1999) Integrated water resources development: a plan for action. National Commission for Integrated Water Resources Development (NCIWRD), Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul S, Panda SN, Kumar DN (2000) Optimal irrigation allocation: a multilevel approach. J Irrig Drain Eng 126(3):149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of the surface heat flux and evaporation using large scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100(2):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawat JS (1988) Water resources and burning hydrological problems of Kumaon. In: Valdiya KS (ed) Kumaon land and people. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, pp 201–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero C, Rehman T (2003) Multiple criteria analysis for agricultural decisions. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, 186p

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant MW, Cai X, Cline SA (2002) Global water outlook to 2025: averting an impeding crisis. Food policy report, A 2020 vision for food, agriculture, and the environment initiative. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC and International Water Management Institute, Colombo

  • Sethi LN, Panda SN, Nayak MK (2006) Optimal crop planning and water resources allocation in a coastal groundwater basin, Orissa, India. Agric Water Manag 83(3):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharda VN (2005) Integrated watershed management: managing valleys and hills in the Himalayas. In: Sharma BR, Samra JS, Scott CA, Wani SP (eds) Watershed management challenges: improving productivity, resources and livelihoods. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, pp 61–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharda VN, Ojasvi PR, Dogra P et al (2009) Scenario-based assessment and management of water resources in mid-Himalayan micro-watersheds with limited data. Hydrol Sci J 54(6):1018–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh DP, Pannu RK (1998) Irrigation management in field crops. In: Yadav RL, Singh P, Prasad R, Ahlawat IPS (eds) Fifty years of agronomic research in India. Indian Society of Agronomy. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, pp 88–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh JS, Singh SP, Ram J (1988) Fodder and fuelwood resources of Central Himalayas: problems and solutions. Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulis K, Dercas N (2007) Development of a GIS-based spatially distributed continuous hydrological model and its first application. Water Int 32(1):177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tecle A (1992) Selecting a multicriterion decision making technique for watershed resource management. Water Resour Bull 28(1):129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya KS, Bartarya SK (1991) Hydrological studies of springs in the catchment of Gaula River, Kumaon, Lesser Himalayas, India. Mt Res Dev 11(3):239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Sun Y, Song L et al (2009) An eco-environmental water demand based model for optimising water resources using hybrid genetic simulated annealing algorithms. J Environ Manag 90(8):2612–2619, 2628–2635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami M, Abrishamchi A, Ardakanian R (2008) Multi-criteria decision making for integrated urban water management. Water Resour Manag 22(8):1017–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny M (1982) Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided for this research by Canadian International Development Agency and Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, 218 Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun, 248195, India

    Pradeep Dogra & P. R. Ojasvi

  2. Agricultural Scientists Recruitment Board, Pusa, New Delhi, 110012, India

    V. N. Sharda

  3. Department of Bio-resource Engineering, McDonald Campus, McGill University, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Montreal, H9X 3V9, Québec, Canada

    Shiv O. Prasher & R. M. Patel

Authors
  1. Pradeep Dogra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. N. Sharda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. R. Ojasvi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shiv O. Prasher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. M. Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep Dogra.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Resource 1

(DOC 973 kb)

Electronic supplementary material

Online Resource 2

(DOC 12.3 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dogra, P., Sharda, V.N., Ojasvi, P.R. et al. Compromise Programming Based Model for Augmenting Food Production with Minimum Water Allocation in a Watershed: a Case Study in the Indian Himalayas. Water Resour Manage 28, 5247–5265 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0666-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0666-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation