Abstract
Recent increase in intensity and frequency of catastrophic hydrologic events is shown to be a major threat to the global economy. These major events have been strongly linked to climate change and are expected to become worse in the future. The intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves quantify the extreme precipitations which are commonly used in planning and design of hydraulic structures. Since it is expected that the trends in extreme precipitation events will alter in the future, this will impact the IDF curves and they will have to be updated. In this study we present a methodology based on equidistance quantile matching (EQM) for updating the IDF curves under climate change. The two main steps in the proposed methodology are: (i) spatial downscaling of the maximum daily precipitation values from the global climate model/s (GCM) data to each of the sub-daily maximums observed at a station under consideration; (ii) explicit description of the changes in the GCM data between the baseline period and the future period (temporal downscaling). The main advantage of the proposed method compared to the existing methods which only use the spatial downscaling/disaggregation methods at baseline period, is that the proposed methodology additionally incorporates the changes in the distributional characteristics of the GCM model between the baseline period and the projection period. In addition, the method is simple to adopt and computationally efficient. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed methodology we use: (i) Canadian GCM model CanESM2 and (ii) its Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) for greenhouse gas concentration trajectories adopted by the IPCC for its Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) for the description of future conditions. The sub-daily annual maximum intensities are obtained for four stations in Canada located at London (Ontario), Hamilton (Ontario), Calgary (Alberta) and Vancouver (British Columbia). It is observed that the proposed approach is skillful in capturing and replicating the historical intensities and frequencies. The results indicated that for all RCP simulations considered in this study there is increase in precipitation intensities for all return periods. The relative increase in precipitation extremes is consistent with the RCP scenarios, i.e., the intensity of RCP-26 is lower than the RCP-45 which in-turn is lower than RCP-85. The quantile-based modeling without the temporal downscaling consistently underestimates the precipitation intensity when compared to the proposed method. The proposed method offers a valuable contribution to water resources planning and management of future extreme conditions.











Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Allan RP, Soden BJ (2008) Atmospheric Warming and the Amplification of Precipitation Extremes. Science 321:1480–1484
Barnett DN, Brown SJ, Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Webb MJ (2006) Quantifying Uncertainty in Changes in Extreme Event Frequency in Response to Doubled CO2 using a Large Ensemble of GCM Simulations. Clim Dyn 26(5):489–511. doi:10.1007/S00382-005-0097-1
Hassanzadeh E, Nazemi A, Elshorbagy, A. (2013) Quantile-Based Downscaling of Precipitation using Genetic Programming: Application to IDF Curves in the City of Saskatoon. J. Hydrol. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000854
Ines AVM, Hansen JW (2006) Bias correction of daily GCM rainfall for crop simulation studies. Agric For Meteorol 138(2006):44–53. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.009
Kao SC, Ganguly AR (2011) Intensity, Duration, and Frequency of Precipitation Extremes Under 21st-Century Warming Scenarios. J Geophys Res 116(D16), D16119. doi:10.1029/2010JD015529
Kharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Wehne M (2013) Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble. Clim Chang doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0705-8
Li H, Sheffield J, Wood EF (2010) Bias Correction of Monthly Precipitation and Temperature Fields from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 Models Using Equidistant Quantile Matching. J Geophys Res 115(D10), D10101. doi:10.1029/2009JD012882
Mailhot A, Duchesne S, Caya D, Talbot G (2007) Assessment of Future Change in Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Curves for Southern Quebec Using the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM). J Hydrol 347:197–210. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.019
MATLAB version 7.12.0. Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc., April 8, 2011.
Millington N, Samiran D, Simonovic SP (2011). The comparison of GEV, Log-Pearson Type-3 and Gumbel Distribution in the Upper Thames River Watershed under Global Climate Models. Water Resources Research Report no. 077, Facility for Intelligent Decision Support, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, London, Ontario, Canada, 54 pages. ISSN: (print) 1931–3200; (online) 1919–3219.
Milly PCD, Julio B, Malin F, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management? Science 319(5863):573–574. doi:10.1126/science.1151915
Mirhosseini G, Srivastava P, Stefanova L (2013) The Impact of Climate Change on Rainfall Intensity–Duration–Frequency (IDF) Curves in Alabama. Reg Environ Chang 13(S1):25–33. doi:10.1007/s10113-012-0375-5
Nguyen VTV, Nguyen TD, Cung A (2007) A Statistical Approach to Downscaling of Sub-Daily Extreme Rainfall Processes for Climate-Related Impact Studies in Urban Areas. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply 7(2):183. doi:10.2166/ws.2007.053
Peck A, Prodanovic P, Simonovic SP (2012) Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curves Under Climate Change: City of London, Ontario, Canada. Canadian Water Resources Journal 37(3):177–189. doi:10.4296/cwrj2011-935
Piani C, Weedon GP, Best M, Gomes SM, Viterbo P, Hagemann S, Haerter JO (2010) Statistical Bias Correction of Global Simulated Daily Precipitation and Temperature for the Application of Hydrological Models. J Hydrol 395(3–4):199–215. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.024
Shigetoshi S, Rocha RP, Silveira R (2009) Non-Stationary Frequency Analysis of Extreme Daily Rainfall in Sao Paulo. Brazil 29:1339–1349. doi:10.1002/joc
Simonovic SP, Vucetic D (2012) Updated IDF curves for London, Hamilton, Moncton, Fredericton and Winnipeg for use with MRAT Project, Report prepared for the Insurance Bureau of Canada, Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, Toronto, Canada, 94 pages.
Simonovic SP, Vucetic D (2013) Updated IDF curves for Bathurst, Coquitlam, St, John’s and Halifax for use with MRAT Project, Report prepared for the Insurance Bureau of Canada, Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, Toronto, Canada, 54 pages.
Solaiman TA, Simonovic SP (2010) National Centers for Environmental Prediction-National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP-NCAR) Reanalyses Data for Hydrologic Modelling on a Basin Scale (2010). Can J Civ Eng 37(4):611–623
Solaiman TA, Simonovic SP (2011) Development of Probability Based Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves under Climate Change. Water Resources Research Report no. 072, Facility for Intelligent Decision Support, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, London, Ontario, Canada, 89 pages. ISBN: (print) 978–0–7714–2893–7; (online) 978–0–7714–2900–2.
Solaiman TA, King LM, Simonovic SP (2011) Extreme Precipitation Vulnerability in the Upper Thames River basin: Uncertainty in Climate Model Projections. Int J Climatol 31:2350–2364. doi:10.1002/joc.2244
Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(4):485–498. doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1
Walsh J (2011) Statistical Downscaling, NOAA Climate Services Meeting, 2011.
Wilby RL, Dawson CW (2007) SDSM 4.2 – A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Version 4.2 User Manual.
Wilcox EM, Donner LJ (2007) The Frequency of Extreme Rain Events in Satellite Rain-Rate Estimates and an Atmospheric General Circulation Model. J Clim 20(1):53–69
Wood AW, Leung LR, Sridhar V, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Clim Chang 62(1–3):189–216, doi:10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013685.99609.9e
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support by the Canadian Water Network Project under Evolving Opportunities for Knowledge Application Grant to the third author. The authors would like to thank Environment Canada for providing the sub-daily annual maximum precipitation used in this research
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastav, R.K., Schardong, A. & Simonovic, S.P. Equidistance Quantile Matching Method for Updating IDFCurves under Climate Change. Water Resour Manage 28, 2539–2562 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0626-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0626-y

