Abstract
To address China’s large population and uneven distribution of water storage, the South-North Water Diversion Project (SNWDP) aims at transferring water from the Yangtze River (Changjiang) Basin to the North China Plain. This project is being implemented over three different routes, referred to as the Eastern, Central, and Western routes, each of which is giving rise to strategic conflicts. In this paper, the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR) is used to systematically investigate these conflicts and obtain strategic insights into them. The Chinese Central Government is involved in each conflict, together with local decision makers, making the entire conflict hierarchical. The conflict is analyzed both as an overall graph model and as three local conflicts, and the resulting equilibria are compared. The Central Government’s preferences, which can be fully elaborated in the single or overall model, account for the differences in equilibria between the overall model and the three local models. The Central Government, which utilizes different strategies in planning, modifying, and building these routes, may be able to control the overall project as it wishes, thereby reaching separate agreements with the relevant decision makers along each route.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abed-Elmdoust A, Kerachian R (2012) Water resources allocation using a cooperative game with fuzzy payoffs and fuzzy coalitions. Water Resour Manag 26(13):3961–3976
Becker N, Easter KW (1995) Water diversions in the Great Lakes Basin analyzed in a Game theory framework. Water Resour Manag 9:221–242
Bennett PG (1995) Modelling decision in international relations: game theory and beyond. Mershon Int Stud Rev 39:19–52
Buckley C (2011) China drought raises questions about climate change. Reuters. http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424053111904819604577643493740.425230.html. Accessed 3 June 2011
Chen Z, Wang H, Qi X (2013) Pricing and water resource allocation scheme for the south-to-north water diversion project in China. Water Resour Manag 27(5):1457–1472
Cho R (2011) How China is dealing with its water crisis. State of the planet. http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/05/05/how-china-is-dealing-with-its-water-crisis/. Accessed 5 May 2011
de Andrade JG, Barbosa PS, Souza LC, Makino DL (2011) Interbasin water transfers: the Brazilian experience and international case comparisons. Water Resour Manag 25:1915–1934
Dono G, Giraldo L, Severini S (2012) The cost of irrigation water delivery: an attempt to reconcile the concepts of cost and efficiency. Water Resour Manag 26(7):1865–1877
Fang L, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (1993) Interactive decision making: the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Wiley, New York
Fang L, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM, Peng X (2003a) A decision support system for interactive decision making, Part 1: model formulation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part C: Appl Rev 33:42–55
Fang L, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM, Peng X (2003b) A decision support system for interactive decision making, Part 2: analysis and output interpretation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part C: Appl Rev 33:56–66
Garcia-Valinas MA (2005) Efficiency and equity in natural resources pricing: a proposal for urban water distribution service. Environ Resour Econ 32(2):183–204
Gonzalez AM, Roman RM, Folegatti MV, Zolin CA (2011) PCJ River Basins’ water availability caused by water diversion scenarios to supply metropolitan areas of Sao Paulo. Water Resour Manag 25:3371–3386
Gu W, Shao D, Jiang Y (2012) Risk evaluation of water shortage in source area of middle route project for South-to-North Water Transfer in China. Water Resour Manag 26:3479–3493
Hamouda L, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2004) Strength of preference in Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Group Decis Negot 13:449–462
Harris E (2011) The impact of institutional path dependence on water market efficiency in Victoria, Australia. Water Resour Manag 25(15):4069–4080
Hipel KW (ed) (2009) Conflict resolution, vols. 1 and 2. Eolss Publishers, Oxford
Hipel KW, Kilgour DM, Fang L, Peng X (1997) The decision support system GMCR in environmental conflict management. Appl Math Comput 83:117–152
Hipel KW, Kilgour DM, Fang L, Peng X (2001) Strategic decision support for the services industry. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 48(3):358–369
Howard N (1971) Paradoxes of rationality: theory of metagames and political behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge
Hung MF, Chie BT (2013) Residential water use: efficiency, affordability, and price elasticity. Water Resour Manag 27(1):275–291
Inohara T, Hipel KW, Walker S (2007) Conflict analysis approaches for investigating attitudes and misperceptions in the War of 1812. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 16(2):181–201
Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2010) Conflict analysis methods: the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, Dordrecht
Kilgour DM, WardMD, Luterbacher U (eds) (1985) Anticipation and stability in two person noncooperative games. Dynamic Models of International conflict. Lynne Eienner Press, Boulder
Kilgour DM, Hipel KW, Peng X, Fang L (2001) Coalition analysis in group decision support. Group Decis Negot 10:159–175
Kucukmehmetoglu M (2009) A game theoretic approach to assess the impacts of major investments on transboundary water resources: the case of the Euphrates and Tigris.Water Resour Manag 23(15):3069–3099
Larson C (2010) Growing shortages of water threaten China’s development. Yale Environment 360. http://e360.yale.edu/feature/growing_shortages_of_water_threaten_chinas_development/2298/. Accessed 26 July 2010
Li KW, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM, Fang L (2004) Preference uncertainty in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part A: Syst Hum 34(4):507–520
Ma J, Hipel KW, De M (2005) Strategic analysis of the James Bay hydro-electric dispute in Canada. Can J Civ Eng 32(5):868–880
Misra AK (2011) Impact of urbanization on the hydrology of Ganga Basin (India). Water Resour Manag 25(2):705–719
Nash JF (1950) Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 36:48–49
Nash JF (1951) Noncooperative games. Ann Math 54(2):286–295
Obeidi A, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (2003) Emotion: the missing ingredient in conflict analysis. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems Man, and Cybernetics, pp 3322–3329
Saaty TL, Alexander JM (1989) Conflict resolution: the analytic hierarchy approach. Praeger Publishers, New York
Sage AP (1991) Decision support system engineering. Wiley, New York
Sechi GM, Zucca R, Zuddas P (2013) Water costs allocation in complex systems using a cooperative game theory approach. Water Resour Manag 1–16
Shao W, Yang D, Hu H, Sanbongi K (2009) Water resources allocation considering the water use flexible limit to water shortage-a case study in the yellow river basin of China. Water Resour Manag 23:869–880
Shi P, Chen C, Srinivasan R, Zhang X, Cai T, Fang X, Qu S, Chen X, Li Q (2011) Evaluating the SWAT model for hydrological modeling in the Xixian watershed and a comparison with the XAJ model. Water Resour Manag 25(10):2595–2612
Silva-Hidalgo H, Martín-Domínguez IR, Alarcón-Herrera MT, Granados-Olivas A (2009) Mathematical modeling for the integrated management of water resources in hydrological basins. Water Resour Manag 23(4):721–730
South-North Water Diversion official site (2011) Massive water diversion project put on fast track. http://www.nsbd.gov.cn/zx/english/. Accessed 29 November 2011
The World Factbook (2014) Total renewable water resources. Central Intelligence Agency. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2201.html. Accessed 10 January 2014
United Nations News Report (2011) Drought alert has been issued by FAO for the three- month insufficient precipitation in North China Plain (in Chinese). United Nations, published on 8 February 2011. http://www.un.org/chinese/News/fullstorynews.asp?newsID=14995. Accessed 23 December 2012
Xu H, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW, Kemkes G (2010) Using Matrices to link conflict evolution and resolution in a graph model. Eur J Oper Res 207:318–329
Zhang LH, Jia SF, Leung CK, Guo LP (2012a) An analysis on the transaction costs of water markets under DPA and UPA auctions. Water Resour Manag 27(2):475–484
Zhang N, He HM, Zhang SF, Jiang XH, Xia ZQ, Huang F (2012b) Influence of reservoir operation in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River (China) on the inflow and outflow regime of the TGR-based on the improved SWAT model. Water Resour Manag 26(3):691–705
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees and the Associate Editor for providing helpful comments that improved the quality of their paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, S., Hipel, K.W. & Kilgour, D.M. Water Diversion Conflicts in China: A Hierarchical Perspective. Water Resour Manage 28, 1823–1837 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0550-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0550-1