Skip to main content
Log in

Methodology for Detecting Critical Points in Pressurized Irrigation Networks with Multiple Water Supply Points

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The modernization processes of hydraulic infrastructures from old open channels to pressurized networks have increased water use efficiency along with a dramatic increase of energy consumptions. The significant energy requirements associated with the increment of the energy tariffs for irrigation involve higher production costs for farmers. Therefore, strategies to reduce energy consumption in irrigation districts are strongly demanded. Methodologies based on sectoring and critical points control have been applied to branched networks with a single water supply point, obtaining significant energy savings. In this work, a new critical point control methodology for networks with multiple sources has been developed: the WEPCM algorithm, which uses the NSGA-II multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to find the lowest energy consumption operation rule of a set of pumping stations connected to an irrigation network that satisfies the pressure requirements, when the critical points are successively disabled. WECPM has been applied to a real irrigation district in Southern Spain. The obtained results were compared with those achieved by the WEBSOM algorithm, developed for sectoring multiple source networks. The control of critical points by the replacement of two pipes and the installation of four booster pumps provided annual energy savings of 36 % compared to the current network operation. Moreover, the control of critical points was more effective than sectoring, obtaining an additional annual energy saving of 10 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

γ:

Water specific weight

η:

Global efficiency of pumps

EC (ECnorm):

Energy consumption (normalized term of EC)

CMPD (CMPDnorm):

Penalty factor depending on the magnitude of pressure (normalized term of CMPD)

h j :

Hydraulic dimensionless coordinate

Hi :

Pressure head of pumping station i

Hw-j :

Required weighted pressure head when hydrant j operates

Hw-mch :

Required weighted pressure head when the most critical hydrant operates

i:

Pumping stations index

j:

Hydrant index

l j :

Topological dimensionless coordinate related to friction losses in pipes

lj-i :

Distance between the hydrant j and the pumping station i

lmax-i :

Distance between the furthest hydrant and the pumping station i

nv :

Number of decision variables

N:

Number of pumping stations

Pf:

Pressure failure percentage

Qi :

Pumped flow by pumping station i

trs :

Daily irrigation time required during month s

z j :

Topological dimensionless coordinate related to the hydrant elevation j

zi :

Pumping station elevation i

zj :

Hydrant elevation j

References

  • Abadia R, Rocamora C, Ruiz-Canales A, Puerto H (2008) Energy efficiency in irrigation distribution networks I: theory. Biosyst Eng 101(1):21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper no. 56. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazilian et al (2011) Considering the energy, water and food nexus: towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy 39:7896–7906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo Cobo MT, Rodríguez Díaz JA, Montesinos P, López Luque R, Camacho Poyato E (2011) Low energy consumption seasonal calendar for sectoring operation in pressurized irrigation networks. Irrig Sci 29:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandapillai J, Sudheer KP, Saseendran S (2012) Design of water distribution network for equitable supply. Water Resour Manag 26:391–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corominas J (2010) Agua y energía en el riego en la época de la sostenibilidad. Ingeniería del Agua 17(3):219–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math 1:269–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández García I, Rodríguez Díaz JA, Camacho Poyato E, Montesinos P (2013) Optimal operation of pressurized irrigation networks with several supply sources. Water Resour Manag 27:2855–2869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co, Incl, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy L, Garrido A, Juana L (2012) Evaluation of Spain’s water-energy nexus. Water Resour Dev 28(1):151–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson TM, Khan S, Hafeez M (2010) A comparativeanalysis of water application and energy consumption at theirrigated field level. Agric Water Manag 97:1477–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson DG, Shamir U, Martinez F, Franchini M (2007) Conceptual design of a generic, real-time, near-optimal control system for water distribution networks. J Hydroinf 9(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Bello MA, Martínez Alzamora F, Bou Soler V, Bartolí Ayala HJ (2010) Methodology for grouping intakes of pressurised irrigation networks into sectors to minimise energy consumption. Biosyst Eng 105:429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khadra R, Lamaddalena N (2010) Development of a decission support system for irrigation systems analysis. Water Resour Manag 24:3279–3297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamaddalena N, Khila S (2012) Energy saving with variable speed pumps in on-demand irrigation systems. Irrig Sci 30:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecina S, Isidoro D, Playán E, Aragüés R (2010) Irrigation modernization and water conservation in Spain: the case of Riegos del Alto Aragón. Agric Water Manag 97:1663–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montesinos P, García-Guzmán A, Ayuso JL (1999) Water distribution network optimization using a modified genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 35:3467–3473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi-Jalal M, Rodin SI, Mariño MA (2004) Use of genetic algorithm in optimization of irrigation pumping stations. J Irrig Drain Eng 130(5):357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno MA, Planells P, Córcoles JL, Tarjuelo JM, Carrión PA (2009) Development of a new methodology to obtain the characteristic pump curves that minimize the total costs at pumping stations. Biosyst Eng 102:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Urrestarazu L, Rodríguez Díaz JA, Camacho Poyato E, López Luque R (2009) Quality of service in irrigation distribution networks: case of Palos de la Frontera irrigation district (Spain). J Irrig Drain Eng 135(6):755–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Playán E, Mateos L (2006) Modernization and optimization of irrigation systems to increase water productivity. Agric Water Manag 80:100–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratap R (2010) Getting started with Matlab. A quick introduction for scientist and engineers. Oxford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocamora MC, Abadía R, Ruiz A (2008) Ahorro y Eficiencia energética en las Comunidades de Regantes. Ministerio de Industria, Turismo y Comercio, IDAE, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Díaz JA, Camacho Poyato E, Blanco Pérez M (2011) Evaluation of water and energy use in pressurized irrigation networks in Southern Spain. J Irrig Drain Eng 137(10):644–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Díaz JA, Pérez Urrestarazu L, Camacho Poyato E, Montesinos P (2012a) Modernizing water distribution networks. Lessons from the Bembézar MD irrigation district, Spain. Outlook Agric 41(4):229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Díaz JA, Montesinos P, Camacho Poyato E (2012b) Detecting critical points in on-demand irrigation pressurized networks - a new methodology. Water Resour Manag 26(6):1693–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman LA (2000) EPANET 2. Users manual. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Savic D (2007) Single-objective vs. multio-objective optimization for integrated decision support. Proceedings of the first biennial meeting of the international environmental modeling and software society 1:7–12 Lugano, Switzerland, June 24–27

  • Siew C, Tanyimboh T (2012) Penalty-free feasibility boundary convergent multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for the optimization of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 26:4485–4507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk M, van Vuuren SJ, van Zyl JE (2008) Optimising water distribution systems using a weighted penalty in a genetic algorithm. Water SA (Online) 34(5):537–548

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is part of the AMERE project (AGL2011-30328-C02-02), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Fernández García.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García, I.F., Montesinos, P., Poyato, E.C. et al. Methodology for Detecting Critical Points in Pressurized Irrigation Networks with Multiple Water Supply Points. Water Resour Manage 28, 1095–1109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0538-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0538-x

Keywords

Navigation