Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of Simple Statistical Downscaling Methods for Monthly Regional Climate Model Simulations with Respect to the Estimated Changes in Runoff in the Czech Republic

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An ensemble of fifteen regional climate model (RCM) simulations has been used to estimate the climate change impacts on runoff and several drought characteristics for 250 basins in the Czech Republic. The scenario series of precipitation and temperature have been derived with four simple statistical downscaling methods (SDMs): the delta change and bias correction method, both in two alternatives considering the changes/biases in the mean, and in the mean and variance. Bootstrap resampling has been used to assess the effect of sampling variability and the differences in the estimated changes in runoff obtained by different SDMs were evaluated. Further simplification of the SDMs (spatial-average changes/biases and ensemble-average changes in precipitation and temperature) have been considered. It was shown, that given the spread between the projections of individual RCM simulations and the sampling variability, the differences in the estimated changes in mean runoff between the SDMs are not very large. The same partly holds also for the effect of spatial averaging. In general, the SDMs accounting for variability have led to smaller decrease (or larger increase) in runoff and the decrease was also smaller for bias correction methods than in the case of delta change methods. In contrast to changes in mean runoff, significant differences between the estimates based on different SDMs were found for the drought characteristics. In addition, the averaging of the changes in precipitation and temperature over the RCMs resulted in much stronger decrease in runoff than indicated by ensemble average changes in runoff.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulla F, Eshtawi T, Assaf H (2009) Assessment of the impact of potential climate change on the water balance of a semi-arid watershed. Water Resour Manag 23(10):2051–2068. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9369-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekele E, Knapp H (2010) Watershed modeling to assessing impacts of potential climate change on water supply availability. Water Resour Manag 24(13):3299–3320. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9607-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter TR, Alfsen K, Barrow E, Bass B, Dai X, Desanker P, Gaffin SE, Giorgi F, Hulme M, Lal M, Mata LJ, Mearns LO, Mitchell JFB, Morita T, Moss R, Murdiyarso D, Pabon-Caicedo JD, Palutikof J, Parry ML, Rosenzweig C, Seguin B, Scholes RJ, Whetton PH (2007) General guidelines on the use od scenario data for climate impact and adaptation assessment. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, Geneva

  • Christensen JH, Christensen OB (2007) A summary of the PRUDENCE model projections of changes in European climate by the end of this century. Clim Chang 81:7–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins M, Booth B, Harris G, Murphy J, Sexton D, Webb M (2006) Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change. Clim Dyn 27:127–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge series on statistical an probabilistic mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Estrela T, Vargas E (2012) Drought management plans in the European Union. The case of Spain. Water Resour Manag 26(6):1537–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000) Directive 200/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Union L 327:1–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Flieg AK, Tallaksen LM, Hisdal H, Demuth S (2006) A global evaluation of streamflow drought characteristics. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:532–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham L, Andréasson J, Carlsson B (2007) Assessing climate change impacts on hydrology from an ensemble of regional climate models, model scales and linking methods—a case study on the lule river basin. Clim Chang 81:293–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves D, Chang H (2007) Hydrologic impacts of climate change in the upper Clackamas River Basin, Oregon, USA. Clim Res 33(2):143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanel M, Vizina A, Maca P, Pavlasek J (2012) A multi-model assessment of climate change impact on hydrological regime in the Czech Republic. J Hydrol Hydromech 60(3):152–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanel M, Kašpárek L, Peláková M, Beran A, Vizina A (2013) Evaluation of changes in deficit volumes: support for protection of localities suitable for construction of reservoirs. In: Schumman A (ed) Considering hydrological change in reservoir planning and management. IAHS Publ. 362, pp 187–192

  • Hewitt CD, Griggs DJ (2004) Ensembles-based predictions of climate changes and their impacts. Eos 85:566

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton R, Gornitz V, Bowman M, Blake R (2010) Chapter 3: climate observations and projections. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1196:41–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutti R, Furrer R, Tebaldi C, Cermak J, Meehl GA (2010) Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models. J Clim 23(10):2739–2758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunstmann H, Schneider K, Forkel R, Knoche R (2004) Impact analysis of climate change for an alpine catchment using high resolution dynamic downscaling of echam4 time slices. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8(6):1031–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunstmann H, Jung G, Wagner S, Clottey H (2008) Integration of atmospheric sciences and hydrology for the development of decision support systems in sustainable water management. Phys Chem Earth A/B/C 33(1–2):165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander R, Buishand TA (2007) Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows. J Hydrol 332(3–4):487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenderink G, Buishand A, van Deursen W (2007) Estimates of future discharges of the river rhine using two scenario methodologies: direct versus delta approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11(3):1145–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Sheffield J, Wood EF (2010) Bias correction of monthly precipitation and temperature fields from intergovernmental panel on climate change ar4 models using equidistant quantile matching. J Geophys Res 115(D10):D10,101

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden P, Mitchell J (2009) ENSEMBLES: climate change and its impacts: summary of research and results from the ENSEMBLES project. Tech. rep., Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK, p160

  • Minville M, Brissette F, Leconte R (2008) Uncertainty of the impact of climate change on the hydrology of a nordic watershed. J Hydrol 358(1–2):70–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novický O, Kašpárek L, Peláková M (2006) Climate change impacts and responses in the Czech Republic and Europe. In: Demuth S, Gustard A, Planos E, Scatena F, Servat E (eds) Climate variability and change hydrological impacts, proceedings of the fifth FRIEND world conference held at Havana, Cuba, November 2006. IAHS Publ. 308, pp 418–423

  • Oudin L, Moulin L, Bendjoudi H, Ribstein P (2010) Estimating potential evapotranspiration without continuous daily data: possible errors and impact on water balance simulations. Hydrol Sci J 55(2):209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piani C, Weedon G, Best M, Gomes S, Viterbo P, Hagemann S, Haerter J (2010) Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models. J Hydrol 395(3–4):199–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puma MJ, Gold S (2011) Formulating climate change scenarios to inform climate-resilient development strategies: a guidebook for practitioners. United Nations Development Programme, New York, USA

  • Ruth M, Bernier C, Jollands N, Golubiewski N (2007) Adaptation of urban water supply infrastructure to impacts from climate and socioeconomic changes: the case of Hamilton, New Zealand. Water Resour Manag 21(6):1031–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samadi S, Carbone G, Mahdavi M, Sharifi F, Bihamta M (2013) Statistical downscaling of river runoff in a semi arid catchment. Water Resour Manag 27(1):117–136. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0170-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senatore A, Mendicino G, Smiatek G, Kunstmann H (2011) Regional climate change projections and hydrological impact analysis for a mediterranean basin in southern Italy. J Hydrol 399(1–2):70–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šercl P (2008) Assessment of methods for area precipitation estimates. Meteorol Bull 61(2):33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabalova MV, van Deursen WPA, Buishand TA (2003) Assessing future discharge of the river Rhine using regional climate model integrations and a hydrological model. Clim Res 23(3):233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Štepánek P, Zahradnícek P, Huth R (2011) Interpolation techniques used for data quality control and calculation of technical series: an example of a Central European daily time series. IDÖJÁRÁS - Quart J Hung Meteorol Serv 115(1–2):87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratenwerth T, van Nood M, Wright J, Garrote L, Kristensen P, Brattenmark M, Davy T, Horvath B (2009) Guidance document no. 24. River basin management in a changin climate. Tech. Rep. 2009 - 040, European Comission

  • Strzepek K, McCluskey A (2006) District level hydroclimatic time series and scenario analyses to assess the impacts of climate change on regional water resources and agriculture in Africa. Special series on climate change and agriculture in Africa. Discussion paper no. 13, Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa, University of Pretoria

  • Sun G, McNulty SG, Moore-Myers JA, Cohen EC (2008) Impacts of climate change, population growth, land use change, and groundwater availability on water supply and demand across the conterminous U.S. Watershed update, vol 6, issue 2, AWRA Hydrology & Watershed Management Technical Committee

  • Sunyer M, Madsen H, Ang P (2012) A comparison of different regional climate models and statistical downscaling methods for extreme rainfall estimation under climate change. Atmos Res 103(0):119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunyer MA, Madsen H, Yamagata K (2010) On the use of statistical downscaling for assessing climate change impacts on hydrology. International workshop advances in statistical hydrology, Taormina, Italy

  • Tallaksen LM, van Lanen HAJ (eds) (2004) Hydrological drought—processes and estimation methods for streamflow and groundwater. Elsevier

  • Terink W, Hurkmans RTWL, Torfs PJJF, Uijlenhoet R (2010) Evaluation of a bias correction method applied to downscaled precipitation and temperature reanalysis data for the rhine basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 7(1):221–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris G, Spiliotis M (2011) Planning against long term water scarcity: a fuzzy multicriteria approach. Water Resour Manag 25(4):1103–1129. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9692-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Troni J, Biot Y, Tedd L, Hewitson BC, Smith DM, Sutton RT (2009) A review of climate risk information for adaptation and development planning. Int J Climatol 29(9):1193–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu CY, Singh VP (2004) Review on regional water resources assessment models under stationary and changing climate. Water Resour Manag 18(6):591–612. doi:10.1007/s11269-004-9130-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Georgakakos A (2012) Joint variable spatial downscaling. Clim Chang 111(3–4):945–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was conducted within a project “Development of information and data support for design of adaptation measures and longterm planning of water resources considering the climate change effects” (TA02020320) financed by the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic. The regional climate model simulations studied in this work were partially funded by the EU FP6 Integrated Project ENSEMBLES (Contract number 505539) whose support is gratefully acknowledged. The ALADIN-CLIMATE/CZ simulation and the gridded observed data were kindly provided by the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute through the research project on Refining of current estimates of impacts of climate change in sectors of water management, agriculture and forestry and proposals of adaptation measures (project No. SP/1a6/108/07) sponsored by Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic. All calculations and plotting was made using R (A language and environment for statistical computing). We thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Hanel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanel, M., Mrkvičková, M., Máca, P. et al. Evaluation of Simple Statistical Downscaling Methods for Monthly Regional Climate Model Simulations with Respect to the Estimated Changes in Runoff in the Czech Republic. Water Resour Manage 27, 5261–5279 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0466-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0466-1

Keywords

Navigation