Skip to main content
Log in

A Method for Evaluating Sea Dike Safety

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To implement the maintenance and management of the sea dike engineering, the qualitative factors and quantitative factors need to be combined to evaluate the sea dike safety. Firstly, the evaluation index system and evaluation grading criterions of sea dike safety are established. Secondly, a new weight structure of evaluation indexes is proposed to combine the subjective weight and objective weight. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process method is used to determine the subjective weight and implement the qualitative analysis for sea dike safety. Projection Pursuit algorithm is introduced to calculate the objective weight and implement the quantitative analysis for sea dike safety. Based on the minimum relative information entropy principle, above two weights are combined. Thirdly, an evaluation model of sea dike safety is built with the improved Set Pair Analysis method. Finally, the proposed analysis method is used to assess one sea dike safety in China. It is shown that the combined weight can describe both the subjective information of expert experience and objective variation information of samples values, the uncertainty of information can be handled by the improved Set Pair Analysis method. The evaluation model has the clear physical concepts and intuitive modeling process. The calculation result is reasonable. The proposed method can be applied to sea dike safety evaluation and other complex systems evaluation as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen Y (2011) The financial investment projection pursuit model. Commun Comput Inf Sci 210:592–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cong MV (2004) Application of probabilistic design and risk analysis in safety assessments of sea dikes and revetments. J Sci Technol Econ 2(10):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Crum DA (1996) Reliability applied to levee seepage. Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Geotechnical Reliability, Proceedings of the Specialty Conference 946–949

  • Dan YG, Yang J (2000) Reinforcement and treatment for the Jiujiang levee works and its safety evaluation. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 17(S1):39–42 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding LH (2011) Research on estimation of slope stability based on improved grey correlation analysis and analytic hierarchy process. Rock Soil Mech 32(11):3437–3441 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckstein L, Bogardi I (1981) Application of reliability theory to hydraulic engineering design. J Hydraul Div Proc ASCE 107(HY7):799–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH, Turkey JWA (1974) Projection pursuit algorithm for exploratory data analysis. IEEE Trans Comput 19(4):224–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzegorz S, Hocine O (2011) Modeling sea dike breaching induced by breaking wave impact-laboratory experiments and computational model. Coast Eng 59:28–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid RF, Nazanin VF, Naghme V (2011) Integration of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) with balance score card (BSC) in order to evaluate the performance of information technology in industry. J Math Comput Sci 2(2):271–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang M, Liu J (2008) The frame of sea wall osmosis pressure monitoring model and factors selection. J Hanghai Jiaotong Univ 42(11):1931–1934 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui GD, Lindsay BG (2010) Projection pursuit via white noise matrices. Sankhya B Appl Interdiscipl Stat 72(2):123–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igor P, Christian P (2005) Projection pursuit indices based on the empirical distribution function. J Comput Graph Stat 14(3):700–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JH, Cai F, Qi HS (2011) Coastal erosion along the west coast of the Taiwan strait and its influencing factors. J Ocean Univ China 10(1):89–94 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkash O, Sharma PK, Mahajan R (2008) New measures of weighted fuzzy entropy and their applications for the study of maximum weighted fuzzy entropy principle. Inf Sci 178(11):2389–2395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilarczyk ZW (1998) Dikes and revetments-design maintenance and safety assessment. Delft hydraulic Engineering Division

  • Rong QB, Zhang HJ, Wang FS (2012) Entropy-based set pair analysis model on geological disaster risk for military engineering. Engineering 4(2):76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedovsky Z (2000) Discussion on: an interse reliability method and its application. Struct Saf 22(1):97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su MR, Yang ZF, Chen B (2009) Set pair analysis for urban ecosystem health assessment. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 14(4):1773–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su HZ, Wen ZP, Wu ZR (2011) Study on an intelligent inference engine in early-warning system of dam health. Water Resour Manag 25(6):1545–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su HZ, Hu J, Wen ZP (2012) Structure analysis for concrete-faced rockfill dams based on information entropy theory and finite element method. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 36(8):1041–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szidarovszky F, Duckstein L, Borgardi I (1975) Levee system reliability along a confluence reach. J Mech Eng Div ASCE 101(EM5):609–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Thieu QT, Nguyen QL, Le NA (2008) Modelling sea dike toe erosion during storms. J Water Resour Environ Eng 23:235–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris G, Spiliotis M (2012) Dam- breach hydrograph modelling: an innovative semi- analytical approach. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0046-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SJ, Ni CJ (2008) Application of projection pursuit dynamic cluster model in regional partition of water resources in China. Water Resour Manag 22(10):1421–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YJ, Zhang WH (2011) Comprehensive sensitivity on fuzzy-stochastic damage field of embankment structure. J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci) 45(9):1672–1679

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang WB, Jin WL, Yu TT (2007) Key technology for risk analysis and safety evaluation of Qiantang River sea dike. J Zhejiang Univy(Eng Sci) 41(1):144–150 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang WS, Jin JL, Ding J, Li YQ (2009) A new approach to water resources system assessment - set pair analysis method. Sci China Ser E Technol Sci 52(10):3017–3023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Zhang H, Zeng YR (2012) Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and balanced scorecard approach for evaluating performance of Third-Party Logistics (TPL) enterprises in Chinese context. Afr J Bus Manag 6(2):521–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZR, Su HZ (2005) Dam health diagnosis and evaluation. Smart Mater Struct 14(3):S130–S136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu XZ, Ding LQ, Zhang JJ (2003) Study on reliability design method of flood defenses. J Hydraul Eng 4(4):94–100 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Jiang JQ, Zhu WD (2004) Reliability analysis for slope stable capacity based on fuzzy probability. J Mar Sci 26(7):26–34 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang XH, Zhang XJ, Hu XX, Yang ZF, Li JQ (2011) Nonlinear optimization set pair analysis model (NOSPAM) for assessing water resource renewability. Nonlinear Process Geophys 18:599–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu TT, Wang WB, You AJ (2009) Analysis of overtopping probability of Xiasha sea dike on Qiantang river. J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci) 49(8):1543–1547 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been partially supported by Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation (SN: BK2012036), National Natural Science Foundation of China (SN: 51179066, 51139001), Non-profit Industry Financial Program of MWR (SN: 201301061, 201201038), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (SN: NCET-10-0359), the research fund of Education Bureau of Zhejiang (No. Y201223037), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2012B06614), Jiangsu Province “333 High-Level Personnel Training Project” (Grant No. BRA2011179) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) (SN: YS11001). The authors thank the reviewers for useful comments and suggestions that helped to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaizhi Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, H., Qin, P. & Qin, Z. A Method for Evaluating Sea Dike Safety. Water Resour Manage 27, 5157–5170 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0459-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0459-0

Keywords

Navigation