Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the Optimal Location for Developments to Minimize Detention Requirements

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A methodology is presented to determine the optimal locations to place various types of developments in a watershed to reduce the changes in flow rates and volume from natural to developed conditions. An optimization model is developed which incorporates the hydrology (based upon rational method computations and a lag routing method) as constraints. The non-linear programming (NLP) model can be solved using Microsoft Excel (generalized reduced gradient (GRG)) procedure, or other NLP software. This model is meant to serve as a planning tool to help develop best management practices for regulatory agencies and to reduce cost of drainage facilities for developers. The model was applied to two examples to show its applicability and usefulness using Excel NLP software, which should enhance the availability of the modeling approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akan AO (1993) Urban stormwater hydrology—a guide to engineering calculations. Technomic, Lancaster. ISBN 0-87762-966-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Akan AO, Houghtalen RJ (2003) Urban hydrology, hydraulics, and stormwater quality. Technomic, Lancaster. ISBN 0-471-43158-3

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (1996) Urban hydrology, Chapter 9, Hydrology handbook, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 28, New York, NY

  • Behera PK, Papa F, Adams BJ (1999) Optimization of regional storm-water management systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag Am Soc Civ Eng 125(2):107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MS, Mays LW (1985) Optimal design of detention and drainage channel systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag Am Soc Civ Eng 111(1):99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia FN, Saraiva MD, Da Silva FN, Ramos I (1999) Floodplain management in urban developing areas. Part I. Urban growth scenarios and land-use controls. Water Resour Manag 13(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goff KM, Gentry RW (2006) The influence of watershed and development characteristics on the cumulative impacts of stormwater detention ponds. Water Resour Manag 20:829–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo JCY (2001a) Design of off-line detention systems, chapter 8. In: Mays LW (ed) Stormwater collection systems design handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo JCY (2001b) Design of infiltration basins for stormwater, chapter 9. In: Mays LW (ed) Stormwater collection systems design handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James WP, Bell JF, Leslie DL (1987) Size and location of detention storage. J Water Resour Plan Manag Am Soc Civ Eng 113(1):15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longanathan GV, Kibler DF, Grizzard TJ (1996) Urban stormwater management, chapter 26. In: Mays L (ed) Water resources handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays LW (2001) Stormwater collection systems design handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays LW (2010) Water resources engineering, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays LW, Bedient PB (1982) Model for optimal size and location of detention basins. J Water Resour Plan Manag Am Soc Civ Eng 108(3):220–285

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuen RH (1974) A regional approach to urban storm water detention. Geophys Res Lett 1(7):321–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCuen RH (1979) Downstream effects of stormwater management basins. J Hydraul Div Am Soc Civ Eng 105(11):1343–1356

    Google Scholar 

  • Muleta MK, Nicklow JW (2004) Joint application of artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms to watershed management. Water Resour Manag 18(5):459–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormsbee LE, Houck MH, Delleur JW (1987) Design of dual-purpose detention systems using dynamic programming. J Water Resour Plan Manag Am Soc Civ Eng 113(4):471–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine JN, Akan AO (2001) Design of detention systems, chapter 7. In: Mays LW (ed) Stormwater collection systems design handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Papa F, Adams BJ (1997) Application of derived probability and dynamic programming techniques to planning regional stormwater management systems. Water Sci Technol 36(5):227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park M, Chung G, Yoo C, Kim J-H (2012) Optimal design of stormwater detention basins using the genetic algorithm. J Civ Eng Korean Soc Civ Eng 16(4):660–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao K, Kumar DS (2004) Spatial decision support system for watershed management. Water Resour Manag 18(5):407–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichold L, Zechman EM, Brill ED, Holmes AH (2010) Simulation-optimization framework to support sustainable watershed development by mimicking the predevelopment flow regime. J Water Resour Plan Manag Am Soc Civ Eng 136(3):366–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahre P, Urbonas B (1990) Stormwater detention. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Taur C, Toth G, Oswald GE, Mays LW (1987) Austin detention basin optimization model. J Water Resour Plan Manag Am Soc Civ Eng 113(7):860–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis QB, Mays LW (2008) Optimizing retention basin networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag Am Soc Civ Eng 134(5):432–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung YK (1988) Multi-objective detention basin design in urban drainage system tradeoff between risk and cost. Water Resour Manag 2:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbonas B, Stahre P (1993) Stormwater: best management practices and detention for water quality, drainage and CSO management. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple W Jr, Kropp R, Burke S (1987) Implementing dual-purpose stormwater detention programs. J Water Resour Plan Manag Am Soc Civ Eng 113(6):779–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh C-H, Labadie JW (1997) Multi-objective watershed-level planning of storm water detention systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag Am Soc Civ Eng 123(6):336–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yen BC, Akan AO (1999) Hydraulic design of urban drainage systems, chapter 14. In: Mays LW (ed) Hydraulic design handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry W. Mays.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chill, J., Mays, L.W. Determination of the Optimal Location for Developments to Minimize Detention Requirements. Water Resour Manage 27, 5089–5100 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0453-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0453-6

Keywords

Navigation