Water Resources Management

, Volume 27, Issue 13, pp 4579–4590

Evaluating Infiltration Mechanisms Using Breakthrough Curve and Mean Residence Time

Article

Abstract

Determination of infiltration mechanism is crucial for the calculation of infiltration flux in the soil which would influence the water balance computation. Two infiltration experiments with different isotopic compositions of rainfall were conducted to analyze the infiltration type by measuring isotopic concentrations (deuterium and oxygen 18) of collected outflow water samples. Models with three transfer functions were used to simulate the isotopic variation of outflows in a soil column. The model performance was evaluated with the comparison of computed and observed isotopic values of outflow. Breakthrough curve based on the isotopic composition of rainfall, initial soil water and outflow, and mean residence time estimated on the best fitting transfer function model were applied to identify the infiltration type in the soil. The results show that infiltration type determination using the comparison between estimated and observed mean residence time and breakthrough curve are similar. Furthermore, we found that soil structure and isotope measurement error affected the determination of mean residence time. Results from this study may provide a framework for describing the infiltration processes in the soil column.

Keywords

Transfer function model Mean residence time Infiltration type Breakthrough curve 

References

  1. Barnes CJ, Bonell M (1996) Application of unit hydrograph techniques to solute transport in catchments. Hydrol Processes 10(6):793–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black JH, Kipp KJ Jr (1983) Movement and tracers through dual porosity media-Experiments and modeling in the Cretaceous Chalk, England. J Hydrol 62:287–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns DA, Murdoch PS, Lawrence GB, Michel RL (1998) Effect of groundwater springs on NO3 concentrations during summer in Catskill Mountain streams. Water Resour Res 34:1987–1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Huang WR, Liu XH, Chen XJ, Flannery MS (2011) Critical flow for water management in a shallow tidal river based on estuarine residence time. Water Resour Manag 25(10):2367–2385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jury WA (1982) Simulation of solute transport using a transfer functions model. Water Resour Res 18:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jury WA, Stolzy LH, Shouse P (1982) A field test of the transfer function model for predicting solute transport. Water Resour Res 18:369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kale RV, Sahoo B (2011) Green-ampt infiltration models for varied field conditions: a revisit. Water Resour Manag 25(14):3505–3536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kargas G, Kerkides P (2011) A contribution to the study of the phenomenon of horizontal infiltration. Water Resour Manag 25:1131–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kirchner JW, FENG XH, Neal C (2000) Fractal stream chemistry and its implication for contaminant transport in catchments. Nature 403:524–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu JT, Zhang JB, Feng J (2008) Green-Ampt model for layered soils with nonuniform initial water content under unsteady infiltration. Sci Soc Am J 72:1041–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maloszewski P, Zuber A (1982) Determining the turnover time of groundwater systems with the aid of environmental tracers. 1. Models and their applicability. J Hydrol 57:207–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCuen RH (2005) Hydrologic analysis and design. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddler River, 859 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. McGuire KJ, McDonnell JJ (2006) A review and evaluation of catchment transit time modeling. J Hydrol 330:543–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McGuire KJ, McDonnell JJ, Weiler M, Kendall C, McGlynn BL, Welker JM, Seibert J (2005) The role of topography on catchment-scale water residence time. Water Resour Res 41, W05002. doi:10.1029/2004WR003657 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morbidelli R, Corradini C, Saltalippi C, Braocca L (2012) Initial soil water content as input to field-scale infiltration and surface runoff models. Water Resour Manag 26:1793–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, І. A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Overton DE (1970) Route or convolute? Water Resour Res 6(1):43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Plummer LN, Busenberg E, Bohlke JK, Nelms DL, Michel RL, Schlosser P (2001) Groundwater residence times in Shenandoah National Park, Blue Ridge Mountains, Virginia, USA: a multi-tracer approach. Chem Geol 179(1–4):93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ren L, Liu ZG, Li BG (2000) Transfer function approach of solute transport in unsaturated homogeneous soil. J Hydraul Eng 2:7–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  21. Stewart MK, McDonnell JJ (1991) Modeling base flow soil water residence times from deuterium concentrations. Water Resour Res 27:2681–2693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vitvar T, Burns DA, Lawrence GB, McDonnell JJ, Wolock DM (2002) Estimation of baseflow residence times in watersheds from the runoff hydrograph recession: method and application in the Neversink watershed, Catskill Mountains, New York. Hydrol Processes 16:1871–1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weiler M, McGlynn BL, McGuire KJ, McDonnell JJ (2003) How does rainfall become runoff? A combined tracer and runoff transfer function approach. Water Resour Res 39(11):1315. doi:10.1029/2003WR002331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. White RE, Dyson JS, Haigh R, Jury WA, Sposito G (1986) A transfer function model of solute transport through soil: 2. Illustrative applications. Water Resour Res 22(2):248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu XM, Pan GX, Jiang HY, Qu YF (2003) The basic properties and heavy metal pollution of urban soils in Nanjing. Ecol Environ Sci 12:19–23 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  26. Ye ZT (1990) The utilization of salt transfer function model in studying water-salt movements in soils. J Hydraul Eng 2:1–9 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  27. Zhao P, Shao M, Wang T (2010) Spatial distributions of soil surface-layer saturated hydraulic conductivity and controlling factors on dam farmlands. Water Resour Manag 24:2247–2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.College of Water Resources and HydrologyHohai UniversityNanjingChina
  3. 3.HydroChina Chengdu Engineering CorporationChengduChina
  4. 4.Department of GeoscienceUniversity of Nevada Las VegasLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations