Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated Assessment of Groundwater Influenced by a Confluence River System: Concurrence with Remote Sensing and Geochemical Modelling

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is growing evidence of escalating pollution threats to groundwater owing to change in mineral phase chemistry arose due to high anthropogenic activities. This manuscript primarily deals with the results of physicochemical parameters in relation to the hydro-geochemistry of groundwater influenced by two confluence river systems i.e. Ganga and Yamuna at Allahabad, India. The groundwater samplings was performed in two seasons namely pre-monsoon and post-monsoon respectively to explore the link of seasonality and impact of land use change on mineral phase and quality of groundwater in the region. Computation of saturation index for both the seasons was performed independently by WATEQ4F geochemical model. The analysis indicates that Halite and Brucite solutions showed a very high degree of under-saturation in both seasons indicated that they were largely affected by the dilution. The chemical categorizations of groundwater samples represented through piper diagram suggested a common composition and origin. It has been found that sodium, magnesium and calcium were the most dominant cations present in the groundwater of the study area. Most of the stations, the water facies during the pre-monsoon season was showing a Mg-HCO3 type (70 %) water while in post-monsoon season its dominant nature was Na-HCO3 type (50 %). The investigation of salinity hazard, residual carbonate and magnesium hazard indicates that groundwater during the both pre and post-monsoon for some of the stations were even not fit for irrigation purpose. At some stations high fluoride content were also reported having elevated concentrations of fluoride in the water samples as compared to WHO/BIS standards. The analysis of land use estimated from Landsat TM imagery and seriation analysis based on iterative performances of permutation matrix suggests that the main driving factors for hydro-geochemical changes are governed by the human induced factors followed by the natural processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA A (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association. Inc, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelo CAJ, Postma D (2005) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution. Taylor & Francis

  • Ball JW, Nordstrom DK (1991a) User’s manual for WATEQ4F, with revised thermodynamic data base and test cases for calculating speciation of major, trace, and redox elements in natural waters

  • Ball JW, Nordstrom DK (1991b) WATEQ4F—user’s manual with revised thermodynamic data base and test cases for calculating speciation of major, trace and redox elements in natural waters. US Geol Surv Open File Rep 90:129–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball JW, Nordstrom DK, Survey G (1991) User’s manual for WATEQ4F, with revised thermodynamic data base and test cases for calculating speciation of major, trace, and redox elements in natural waters

  • Berner RA (1981) A new geochemical classification of sedimentary environments. J Sed Res 51(2)

  • Bharose R, Lal SB, Singh SK, Srivastava PK (2013) Heavy metals pollution in soil-water-vegetation continuum irrigated with ground water and untreated sewage. Bull Environ Sci Res 2(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraux G, Pinloche S (2005) PermutMatrix: a graphical environment to arrange gene expression profiles in optimal linear order. Bioinformatics 21(7):1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey M, Fretwell B, Mosley N, Smith J (2002) Guidance on the use of permeable reactive barriers for remediating contaminated groundwater. National Groundwater & Contaminated Land Centre report NC 1: 51

  • Chidambaram S, Anandhan P, Prasanna M, Srinivasamoorthy K, Vasanthavigar M (2012a) Major ion chemistry and identification of hydrogeochemical processes controlling groundwater in and around Neyveli Lignite Mines, Tamil Nadu, South India. Arab J Geosci 1–17

  • Chidambaram S, Prasanna M, Singaraja C, Thilagavathi R, Pethaperumal S, Tirumalesh K (2012b) Study on the saturation index of the carbonates in the groundwater using WATEQ4F, in layered coastal aquifers of Pondicherry. J Geol Soc India 80(6):813–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox MAA, Cox TF (2008) Multidimensional scaling. Handb Data Vis 315–347

  • Datta P, Tyagi S (1996) Major ion chemistry of groundwater in Delhi area: chemical weathering processes and groundwater flow regime. J Geol Soc India 47:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Domenico PA, Schwartz FW (1990) Physical and chemical hydrogeology, vol 824. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Doneen LD (1964) Notes on water quality in agriculture. Department of Water Science and Engineering. University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton FM(1950) Significance of carbonates in irrigation waters. Soil Science 69(2):123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrels R, Christ C (1965) Minerals, solutions, and equilibria. Minerals, solutions, and equilibria

  • Gibbs RJ (1970) Mechanisms controlling world water chemistry. Science (New York, NY) 170(3962):1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs RJ (1972) Water chemistry of the Amazon River. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 36(9):1061–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs RJ (1977) Clay mineral segregation in the marine environment. J Sed Res 47(1)

  • Gowd SS (2005) Assessment of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purposes: a case study of Peddavanka watershed, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 48(6):702–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta M, Srivastava PK (2010) Integrating GIS and remote sensing for identification of groundwater potential zones in the hilly terrain of Pavagarh, Gujarat, India. Water Int 35(2):233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishaku I, Ahmed A, Abubakar M (2011) Assessment of groundwater quality using chemical indices and GIS mapping in Jada area, Northwestern Nigeria. J Earth Sci Geotech Eng 1(1):35–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeevanandam M, Kannan R, Srinivasalu S, Rammohan V (2007) Hydrogeochemistry and groundwater quality assessment of lower part of the Ponnaiyar River Basin, Cuddalore district, South India. Environ Monit Assess 132(1–3):263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenoyer GJ, Bowser CJ (1992) Groundwater chemical evolution in a sandy silicate aquifer in northern Wisconsin: 1. Patterns and rates of change. Water Resour Res 28(2):579–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Kumari K, Ramanathan A, Saxena R (2007) A comparative evaluation of groundwater suitability for irrigation and drinking purposes in two intensively cultivated districts of Punjab, India. Environ Geol 53(3):553–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan E, Kannan R, Kumar MS (2003) Major ion chemistry and identification of hydrogeochemical processes of ground water in a part of Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Geosci 10(4):157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd J, Heathcote J (1985) Natural inorganic hydrochemistry in relation to groundwater: an introduction. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McIver JP, Carmines EG (1981) Unidimensional scaling, vol 24. Sage Publications, Inc

  • Mukherjee S, Shashtri S, Singh C, Srivastava P, Gupta M (2009) Effect of canal on land use/land cover using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37(3):527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi P, Ahonen L, Tuovinen OH (2009) Thermodynamic modelling of iron solubility in sulphide mineral leaching. Adv Mater Res 71:441–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal R, Poonia S (1979) Dimensions of gypsum bed in relation to residual sodium carbonate of irrigation water, size of gypsum fragments and flow velocity. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 27(1):5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel DP, Srivastava PK (2013) Flood hazards mitigation analysis using remote sensing and GIS: correspondence with town planning scheme. Water Resour Manag 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0291-6

  • Patel DP, Gajjar CA, Srivastava PK (2012) Prioritization of Malesari mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis: a remote sensing and GIS perspective. Environ Earth Sci 1–14. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-2086-0

  • Piper A (1944) A graphical procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analysis. Trans Am Geophys Union 25:914–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju NJ (2007) Hydrogeochemical parameters for assessment of groundwater quality in the upper Gunjanaeru River basin, Cuddapah District, Andhra Pradesh, South India. Environ Geol 52(6):1067–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh K, Elango L (2012) Groundwater quality and its suitability for domestic and agricultural use in Tondiar river basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Monit Assess 184(6):3887–3899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Soil Sci 78(2):154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson FN (1991) Geochemistry of ground water in alluvial basins of Arizona and adjacent parts of Nevada, New Mexico, and California

  • Scott CA, Megdal S, Oroz LA, Callegary J, Vandervoet P (2012) Effects of climate change and population growth on the transboundary Santa Cruz aquifer. Clim Res 51(2):159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharif M, Davis R, Steele K, Kim B, Kresse T, Fazio J (2008) Inverse geochemical modeling of groundwater evolution with emphasis on arsenic in the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer, Arkansas (USA). J Hydrol 350(1):41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma U (2003) Impact of population growth and climate change on the quantity and quality of water resources in the northeast of India. Int Assoc Hydrol Sci Publ 281:349–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma NK, Bhardwaj S, Srivastava PK, Thanki YJ, Gadhia PK, Gadhia M (2012) Soil chemical changes resulting from irrigating with petrochemical effluents. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9(2):361–370. doi:10.1007/s13762-012-0039-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Srivastava PK, Gupta M, Mukherjee S (2012) Modeling mineral phase change chemistry of groundwater in a rural–urban fringe. Water Sci Technol 66(7):1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Srivastava PK, Gupta M, Thakur JK, Mukherjee S (2013a) Appraisal of land use/land cover of mangrove forest ecosystem using support vector machines. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2628-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Srivastava PK, Pandey AC (2013b) Fluoride contamination mapping of groundwater in Northern India integrated with geochemical indicators and GIS. Water Sci Technol Water Supply. doi:10.2166/ws2013160

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava PK, Mukherjee S, Gupta M (2008) Groundwater quality assessment and its relation to land use/land cover using remote sensing and GIS. Proceedings of international groundwater conference on groundwater use—efficiency and sustainability: groundwater and drinking water issues, Jaipur, India, 19–22

  • Srivastava PK, Mukherjee S, Gupta M (2010) Impact of urbanization on land use/land cover change using remote sensing and GIS: a case study. Int J Ecol Econ Stat 18(S10):106–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava PK, Gupta M, Mukherjee S (2012a) Mapping spatial distribution of pollutants in groundwater of a tropical area of India using remote sensing and GIS. App Geomatics 4(1):21–32. doi:10.1007/s12518-011-0072-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava PK, Han D, Gupta M, Mukherjee S (2012b) Integrated framework for monitoring groundwater pollution using a geographical information system and multivariate analysis. Hydrol Sci J 57(7):1453–1472. doi:10.1080/02626667.2012.716156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava PK, Han D, Rico-Ramirez MA, Bray M, Islam T (2012c) Selection of classification techniques for land use/land cover change investigation. Adv Space Res 50(9):1250–1265. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.06.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava PK, Kiran G, Gupta M, Sharma N, Prasad K (2012d) A study on distribution of heavy metal contamination in the vegetables using GIS and analytical technique. Int J Ecol Dev 21(1):89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava PK, Singh S, Gupta M, Thakur JK, Mukherjee S (2012e) Modeling impact of land use change trajectories on groundwater quality using remote sensing and GIS. Environ Eng Manag J (In Press)

  • Stallard R, Edmond J (1983) Geochemistry of the Amazon 2. The influence of geology and weathering environment on the dissolved load. J Geophys Res 88(C14):9671–9688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcs I, Darab C (1964) The influence of irrigation water of high sodium carbonate content of soils. In: Proceedings of. pp 802–812

  • Toran LE, Saunders JA (1999) Modeling alternative paths of chemical evolution of Na-HCO3-type groundwater near Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. Hydrogeol J 7(4):355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedy R, Goel P (1984) Chemical and biological methods for water pollution studies, vol 215. Environmental Publications, Karad

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RE, Rabalais NN (2003) Linking landscape and water quality in the Mississippi River Basin for 200 years. Bioscience 53(6):563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi S, Datta P, Pruthi N (2009) Hydrochemical appraisal of groundwater and its suitability in the intensive agricultural area of Muzaffarnagar district, Uttar Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 56(5):901–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter A, Frind E, Blowes D, Ptacek C, Molson J (1994) Modeling of multicomponent reactive transport in groundwater: 1. Model development and evaluation. Water Resour Res 30(11):3137–3148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox L (1955) Classification and use of irrigation waters. US Department of Agriculture

Download references

Acknowledgment

Authors are thankful to the University Grant Commission, Delhi, for providing the financial grant for this research [Grant no. F. No. 42-74/2013 (SR)]. Authors express their special thanks to the Dr. Indresh Kumar, Assistant Technical Officer, State Pollution Control Board, Kanpur, India for analysis of the groundwater samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashant Kumar Srivastava.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, S.K., Srivastava, P.K., Pandey, A.C. et al. Integrated Assessment of Groundwater Influenced by a Confluence River System: Concurrence with Remote Sensing and Geochemical Modelling. Water Resour Manage 27, 4291–4313 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0408-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0408-y

Keywords

Navigation