Skip to main content
Log in

Using Promethee V to Select Alternatives so as to Rehabilitate Water Supply Network with Detected Leaks

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of the ageing infrastructure of urban water distribution networks and the loss of water associated with this has been one of the greatest infrastructure problems in urban areas. When a leakage is detected in the water supply network, problems arise when seeking to rehabilitate the network. Therefore, the decision problem is to choose which components to add or to improve and to maximize the benefits, which will result from the changes implemented. In addition, it is important to minimize costs, since water supply companies have limited budgets. Moreover, there are often several leakage points in the same water supply network and in the same period of analysis. Therefore, this paper puts forward a model for rehabilitating the greatest number of leakage points in a water network; it respects the constraints which a water company may have. Promethee V is used to assist the decision maker (DM) in selecting a set of feasible alternatives for rehabilitating the network from the criteria and the constraints set by the DM on the problem. For demonstration purposes, the proposed model was tested in a simulated network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Taleb MF, Mareschal B (1995) Water resources planning in the Middle East: application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method. Eur J Oper Res 81:500–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albadvi A, Chaharsooghi SK, Esfahanipour A (2007) Decision making in stock trading: an application of Promethee. Eur J Oper Res 177:673–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida AT, Vetschera R (2012) A note on scale transformations in the PROMETHEE V method. Eur J Oper Res 219:198–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvisi S, Franchini M (2009) Multiobjective optimization of rehabilitation and leakage detection scheduling in water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135:426–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behzadian M, Kazemzadeh RB, Albadvi A, Aghdasi M (2010) PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res 200:198–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, USA

  • Bimpas M, Amditis A, Uzunoglu N (2010) Detection of water leaks in supply pipes using continuous wave sensor operating at 2.45 GHz. J Appl Geophys 70:226–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Mareschal B (2005) Chapter 5. Promethee methods. In: Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Int Ser Oper Res Manag Sci 78(3):163–186

  • Brans JP, Vincke PH (1985) A preference ranking organization method, the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Manag Sci 31(6):647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan MJ, Gao Y, Joseph PF (2007) On the relationship between time and frequency domain methods in time delay estimation for leak detection in water distribution pipes. J Sound Vib 304:213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung PB, Girol GV, Abe N, Propato M (2010) Night flow analysis and modeling for leakage estimation in a water distribution system. In: Boxall JB, Maksimovic C (eds) Integrating water systems. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 509–513

  • Christodoulou S, Deligianni A (2010) A neurofuzzy decision framework for the management of water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 24:139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark RM, Stafford CL, Goodrich JA (1982) Water distribution systems: a spatial and cost evaluation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 108:243–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Galván X, Pérez-García R, Izquierdo J, Mora-Rodríguez J (2010) An analytic hierarchy process for assessing externalities in water leakage management. Math Comput Model 52:1194–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency - EPA (2007) Innovation and research for water infrastructure for the 21st century – research plan. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development – National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante M, Brunone B (2003a) Pipe system diagnosis and leak detection by unsteady-state tests. 1. Harmonic analysis. Adv Water Resour 26:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante M, Brunone B (2003b) Pipe system diagnosis and leak detection by unsteady-state tests. 2. Wavelet analysis. Adv Water Resour 26:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French S, Geldermann J (2005) The varied contexts of environmental decision problems and their implications for decision support. Environ Sci Pol 8(4):378–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadzilacos T, Kalles D, Preston N, Melbourne P, Camarinopoulos L, Eimermacher M, Kallidromitis V, Frondistou-Yannas S, Saegrov S (2000) UtilNets: a water mains rehabilitation decision-support system. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24:215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi A, Samani HMV, Samani ZMV (2011) GA-ILP method for optimization of water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 25:1791–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S (2007) A comparison of multiple criteria analysis and unaided approaches to environmental decision making. Environ Sci Pol 10(3):177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halhal D, Walters GA, Ouazar D, Savic DA (1997) Water network rehabilitation with structured messy genetic algorithm. J Water Resour Plan Manag 123(3):137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herz RK (1998) Exploring rehabilitation needs and strategies for water distribution networks. J Water Serv Res Technol 47:275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Holnicki-Szulc J, Kolakowski P, Nasher N (2005) Leakage detection in water networks. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 16:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JH, Mays LW (1994) Optimal rehabilitation model for water-distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 120:674–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner Y, Adams BJ, Rogers JS (1998) Long-term planning methodology for water distribution system rehabilitation. Water Resour Res 34:2039–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert V, Hirner W (2002) Losses from water supply systems: standard terminology and recommended performance measures. Voda i sanitarna tehnika 32:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee PJ, Vítkovský JP, Lamberta MF, Simpsona AR, Liggett JA (2005) Leak location using the pattern of the frequency response diagram in pipelines: a numerical study. J Sound Vib 284:1051–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee PJ, Lambert MF, Simpson AR, Vítkovský JP, Liggett J (2006) Experimental verification of the frequency response method for pipeline leak detection. J Hydraul Res 44:693–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macharis C, Brans JP, Mareschal B (1998) The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure – A PROMETHEE-GAIA based procedure for group decision support. J Decis Syst 7:283–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Macharis C, Springael J, Brucker K, Verbeke A (2004) PROMETHEE and AHP: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. Eur J Oper Res 153:307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamlook R, Al-Jayyousi O (2003) Fuzzy sets analysis for leak detection in infrastructure systems: a proposed methodology. Clean Technol Environ Policy 6:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais DC, Almeida AT (2007) Group decision-making for leakage management strategy of water network. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:441–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais DC, Almeida AT (2006) Group decision model to manage water losses. Pesquisa Operacional 26(3):567–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais DC, Cavalcante CAV, de Almeida AT (2010) Prioritization of areas of loss control in water distribution networks. Pesqui Oper 30(1):15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounce SR, Boxall JB, Machell J (2010) Development and verification of an online artificial intelligence system for detection of bursts and other abnormal flows. J Water Resour Plan Manag 136:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mpeshaa W, Gassmana SL, Chaudhrya MH (2001) Leak detection in pipes by frequency response method. J Hydraul Eng 127:134–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mpeshaa W, Chaudhrya MH, Gassmana SL (2002) Leak detection in pipes by frequency response method using a step excitation. J Hydraul Res 40:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muggleton JM, Brennan MJ (2005) Axisymmetric wave propagation in buried, fluid-filled pipes: effects of wall discontinuities. J Sound Vib 281:849–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muggleton JM, Brennan MJ, Linford PW (2004) Axisymmetric wave propagation in fluid-filled pipes: wavenumber measurements in in vacuo and buried pipes. J Sound Vib 270:171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puust R, Kapelan Z, Savic DA, Koppel T (2010) A review of methods for leakage management in pipe networks. Urban Water J 7:25–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos H, Reis C, Ferreira C, Falcão C, Covas D (2001) Leakage control policy within operating management tools. In: Ulanicki B, Coulbeck B, Rance JP (eds) Water Software Systems: theory and applications. CCWI Computer and Control for Water Industry. Research Studies Press Ltd 2001, pp 61–73

  • Sægrov S, Melo Baptista JF, Conroy P, Herz RK, LeGauffre P, Moss G, Oddevald JE, Rajani B, Schiatti M (1999) Rehabilitation of water networks: survey of research needs and on-going efforts. Urban Water 1:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldarriaga JG, Ochoa S, Moreno ME, Romero N, Cortes OJ (2010) Prioritised rehabilitation of water distribution networks using dissipated power concept to reduce non-revenue water. Urban Water J 7:121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva VBS, Morais DC, Alemida AT (2010) A multicriteria group decision model to support watershed committees in brazil. Water Resour Manag 24(14):4075–4091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabesh M, Yekta AHA, Burrows R (2009) An integrated model to evaluate losses in water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 23:477–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabesh M, Delavar MR, Delkhah A (2010) Use of geospatial information system based tool for renovation and rehabilitation of water distribution systems. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7:47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetschera R, Almeida AT (2012) A PROMETHEE-based approach to portfolio selection problems. Comput Oper Res 39:1010–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincke P (1992) Multicriteria decision aid. Jonh Wiley and Sons, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters GA, Halhal D, Savic D, Ouazar D (1999) Improved design of “anytown” distribution network using structured messy genetic algorithms. Urban Water 1:23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZY (2009) Unified parameter optimisation approach for leakage detection and extended-period simulation model calibration. Urban Water J 6:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZY, Simpson AR (2001) Competent genetic-evolutionary optimization of water distribution systems. J Comput Civ Eng 15(2):89–101

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is part of research studies funded by the Brazilian Research Bureau (CAPES) and the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. C. Morais.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fontana, M.E., Morais, D.C. Using Promethee V to Select Alternatives so as to Rehabilitate Water Supply Network with Detected Leaks. Water Resour Manage 27, 4021–4037 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0393-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0393-1

Keywords

Navigation