Water Resources Management

, Volume 27, Issue 11, pp 4021–4037 | Cite as

Using Promethee V to Select Alternatives so as to Rehabilitate Water Supply Network with Detected Leaks

Article

Abstract

The problem of the ageing infrastructure of urban water distribution networks and the loss of water associated with this has been one of the greatest infrastructure problems in urban areas. When a leakage is detected in the water supply network, problems arise when seeking to rehabilitate the network. Therefore, the decision problem is to choose which components to add or to improve and to maximize the benefits, which will result from the changes implemented. In addition, it is important to minimize costs, since water supply companies have limited budgets. Moreover, there are often several leakage points in the same water supply network and in the same period of analysis. Therefore, this paper puts forward a model for rehabilitating the greatest number of leakage points in a water network; it respects the constraints which a water company may have. Promethee V is used to assist the decision maker (DM) in selecting a set of feasible alternatives for rehabilitating the network from the criteria and the constraints set by the DM on the problem. For demonstration purposes, the proposed model was tested in a simulated network.

Keywords

Water distribution network Leakage Network rehabilitation Promethee V 

References

  1. Abu-Taleb MF, Mareschal B (1995) Water resources planning in the Middle East: application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method. Eur J Oper Res 81:500–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albadvi A, Chaharsooghi SK, Esfahanipour A (2007) Decision making in stock trading: an application of Promethee. Eur J Oper Res 177:673–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida AT, Vetschera R (2012) A note on scale transformations in the PROMETHEE V method. Eur J Oper Res 219:198–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvisi S, Franchini M (2009) Multiobjective optimization of rehabilitation and leakage detection scheduling in water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135:426–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behzadian M, Kazemzadeh RB, Albadvi A, Aghdasi M (2010) PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res 200:198–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Bimpas M, Amditis A, Uzunoglu N (2010) Detection of water leaks in supply pipes using continuous wave sensor operating at 2.45 GHz. J Appl Geophys 70:226–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brans JP, Mareschal B (2005) Chapter 5. Promethee methods. In: Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Int Ser Oper Res Manag Sci 78(3):163–186Google Scholar
  9. Brans JP, Vincke PH (1985) A preference ranking organization method, the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Manag Sci 31(6):647–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brennan MJ, Gao Y, Joseph PF (2007) On the relationship between time and frequency domain methods in time delay estimation for leak detection in water distribution pipes. J Sound Vib 304:213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheung PB, Girol GV, Abe N, Propato M (2010) Night flow analysis and modeling for leakage estimation in a water distribution system. In: Boxall JB, Maksimovic C (eds) Integrating water systems. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 509–513Google Scholar
  12. Christodoulou S, Deligianni A (2010) A neurofuzzy decision framework for the management of water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 24:139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark RM, Stafford CL, Goodrich JA (1982) Water distribution systems: a spatial and cost evaluation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 108:243–256Google Scholar
  14. Delgado-Galván X, Pérez-García R, Izquierdo J, Mora-Rodríguez J (2010) An analytic hierarchy process for assessing externalities in water leakage management. Math Comput Model 52:1194–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Environmental Protection Agency - EPA (2007) Innovation and research for water infrastructure for the 21st century – research plan. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development – National Risk Management Research Laboratory, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrante M, Brunone B (2003a) Pipe system diagnosis and leak detection by unsteady-state tests. 1. Harmonic analysis. Adv Water Resour 26:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferrante M, Brunone B (2003b) Pipe system diagnosis and leak detection by unsteady-state tests. 2. Wavelet analysis. Adv Water Resour 26:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. French S, Geldermann J (2005) The varied contexts of environmental decision problems and their implications for decision support. Environ Sci Pol 8(4):378–391Google Scholar
  19. Hadzilacos T, Kalles D, Preston N, Melbourne P, Camarinopoulos L, Eimermacher M, Kallidromitis V, Frondistou-Yannas S, Saegrov S (2000) UtilNets: a water mains rehabilitation decision-support system. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24:215–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haghighi A, Samani HMV, Samani ZMV (2011) GA-ILP method for optimization of water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 25:1791–1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hajkowicz S (2007) A comparison of multiple criteria analysis and unaided approaches to environmental decision making. Environ Sci Pol 10(3):177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halhal D, Walters GA, Ouazar D, Savic DA (1997) Water network rehabilitation with structured messy genetic algorithm. J Water Resour Plan Manag 123(3):137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herz RK (1998) Exploring rehabilitation needs and strategies for water distribution networks. J Water Serv Res Technol 47:275–283Google Scholar
  24. Holnicki-Szulc J, Kolakowski P, Nasher N (2005) Leakage detection in water networks. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 16:207–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim JH, Mays LW (1994) Optimal rehabilitation model for water-distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 120:674–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kleiner Y, Adams BJ, Rogers JS (1998) Long-term planning methodology for water distribution system rehabilitation. Water Resour Res 34:2039–2051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lambert V, Hirner W (2002) Losses from water supply systems: standard terminology and recommended performance measures. Voda i sanitarna tehnika 32:29–38Google Scholar
  28. Lee PJ, Vítkovský JP, Lamberta MF, Simpsona AR, Liggett JA (2005) Leak location using the pattern of the frequency response diagram in pipelines: a numerical study. J Sound Vib 284:1051–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee PJ, Lambert MF, Simpson AR, Vítkovský JP, Liggett J (2006) Experimental verification of the frequency response method for pipeline leak detection. J Hydraul Res 44:693–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Macharis C, Brans JP, Mareschal B (1998) The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure – A PROMETHEE-GAIA based procedure for group decision support. J Decis Syst 7:283–307Google Scholar
  31. Macharis C, Springael J, Brucker K, Verbeke A (2004) PROMETHEE and AHP: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. Eur J Oper Res 153:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mamlook R, Al-Jayyousi O (2003) Fuzzy sets analysis for leak detection in infrastructure systems: a proposed methodology. Clean Technol Environ Policy 6:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morais DC, Almeida AT (2007) Group decision-making for leakage management strategy of water network. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:441–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morais DC, Almeida AT (2006) Group decision model to manage water losses. Pesquisa Operacional 26(3):567–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morais DC, Cavalcante CAV, de Almeida AT (2010) Prioritization of areas of loss control in water distribution networks. Pesqui Oper 30(1):15–32Google Scholar
  36. Mounce SR, Boxall JB, Machell J (2010) Development and verification of an online artificial intelligence system for detection of bursts and other abnormal flows. J Water Resour Plan Manag 136:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mpeshaa W, Gassmana SL, Chaudhrya MH (2001) Leak detection in pipes by frequency response method. J Hydraul Eng 127:134–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mpeshaa W, Chaudhrya MH, Gassmana SL (2002) Leak detection in pipes by frequency response method using a step excitation. J Hydraul Res 40:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muggleton JM, Brennan MJ (2005) Axisymmetric wave propagation in buried, fluid-filled pipes: effects of wall discontinuities. J Sound Vib 281:849–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muggleton JM, Brennan MJ, Linford PW (2004) Axisymmetric wave propagation in fluid-filled pipes: wavenumber measurements in in vacuo and buried pipes. J Sound Vib 270:171–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Puust R, Kapelan Z, Savic DA, Koppel T (2010) A review of methods for leakage management in pipe networks. Urban Water J 7:25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramos H, Reis C, Ferreira C, Falcão C, Covas D (2001) Leakage control policy within operating management tools. In: Ulanicki B, Coulbeck B, Rance JP (eds) Water Software Systems: theory and applications. CCWI Computer and Control for Water Industry. Research Studies Press Ltd 2001, pp 61–73Google Scholar
  43. Sægrov S, Melo Baptista JF, Conroy P, Herz RK, LeGauffre P, Moss G, Oddevald JE, Rajani B, Schiatti M (1999) Rehabilitation of water networks: survey of research needs and on-going efforts. Urban Water 1:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saldarriaga JG, Ochoa S, Moreno ME, Romero N, Cortes OJ (2010) Prioritised rehabilitation of water distribution networks using dissipated power concept to reduce non-revenue water. Urban Water J 7:121–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silva VBS, Morais DC, Alemida AT (2010) A multicriteria group decision model to support watershed committees in brazil. Water Resour Manag 24(14):4075–4091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tabesh M, Yekta AHA, Burrows R (2009) An integrated model to evaluate losses in water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 23:477–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tabesh M, Delavar MR, Delkhah A (2010) Use of geospatial information system based tool for renovation and rehabilitation of water distribution systems. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7:47–58Google Scholar
  48. Vetschera R, Almeida AT (2012) A PROMETHEE-based approach to portfolio selection problems. Comput Oper Res 39:1010–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vincke P (1992) Multicriteria decision aid. Jonh Wiley and Sons, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  50. Walters GA, Halhal D, Savic D, Ouazar D (1999) Improved design of “anytown” distribution network using structured messy genetic algorithms. Urban Water 1:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu ZY (2009) Unified parameter optimisation approach for leakage detection and extended-period simulation model calibration. Urban Water J 6:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wu ZY, Simpson AR (2001) Competent genetic-evolutionary optimization of water distribution systems. J Comput Civ Eng 15(2):89–101Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal University of PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations