Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Increasing Water Security: An Algorithm to Improve Water Distribution Performance

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water Distribution Systems (WDSs) are indispensable infrastructures for urban societies. Due to vitality of continuous supply of drinking water in urban areas, it is necessary to have a performance evaluation and monitoring system to provide the expected level of security in water distribution systems. A main weakness point of these systems is the physical break of pipes which results in high level of water loss, pollution risk and public unsatisfactory. In this study, a framework is developed to increase physical water supply security in urban areas. For this purpose, a physical vulnerability index (PVI) is developed for evaluation of physical statues of water mains. In quantifying PVI, pipe characteristics and bedding soil specifications are considered. The importance of these factors on PVI is determined using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In system performance evaluation, the pipe role in system performance is incorporated regarding pipe location in WDS, distance of pipe from reservoir and average pressure of pipe. Then, System Physical Performance Index (SPVI) is evaluated. An optimization algorithm is employed to determine ways to improve the system performance through enhancing the physical condition of the pipe in the system at a minimum cost. The genetic algorithm is employed for solving the optimization model. A global sensitivity analysis method named FAST, is used for sensitivity analysis to incorporate the correlation between different parameters in analysis. The proposed framework is applied to a case study located in Tehran metropolitan area. The results of this study show the significant value of the proposed algorithm in supporting decision makers to better choose vulnerable pipes for rehabilitation practices in order to decrease system vulnerability against physical failures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Al-Barqawi H, Zayed T (2008) Infrastructure management: integrated AHP/ANN model to evaluate municipal water mains’ performance. J Infrastruct Syst 14(4):305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adge WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreou S (1986) Predictive models for pipe break failures and their implications on maintenance planning strategies for deteriorating water distribution systems. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreou SA, Marks DH (1987) Maintenance decisions for deteriorating water pipes. J Pipelines 7:21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Baoyu Z, Xinhua Z, Yuan Z (2009) Vulnerability assessment of regional water distribution systems. Environ Scie Info Appl Technol 2:473–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Brémond B (1997) Statistical modeling as help in network renewal decision. European Commission Co-operation on Science and Technology (COST), Committee C3 – Diagnostics of Urban Infrastructure, Paris, France

  • Chun MH, Han SJ, Tak NI (2000) An uncertainty importance measure using a distance metric for the change in a cumulative distribution function. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 70(3):313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark RM, Stafford CL, Goodrich JA (1982) Water distribution systems: a spatial and cost evaluation. J Water Res Plan Manag 108(3):243–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantine AG, Darroch JN (1993) Pipeline reliability: Stochastic models in engineering technology and management. In: Osaki S, Murthy DNP (eds.), World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore

  • Cukier RI, Fortuin CM, Shuler KE, Petschek AG, Schaibly JH (1973) Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I. Theory. J Chem Phys 59(8):3873–3878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dandy GC, Engelhardt M (2001) Optimal scheduling of water pipe replacement using genetic algorithms. J Water Res Plan Manag 127(4):214–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dandy GC, Engelhardt M (2006) Multi-objective trade-offs between cost and reliability in the replacement of water mains. J Water Res Plan Manag 132(2):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey K (2003) Analytic hierarchy process analyzes risk of operating cross-country petroleum pipelines in India. Nat Hazards Rev 4(4):213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey K (2004) Decision support system for inspection and maintenance: a case study of oil pipelines. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 51(1):47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Schaetzen W, Savic DA, Walters GA (1998) A genetic algorithm approach to pump scheduling in water supply systems. Proceedings of Hydroinformatics 98, Rotterdam, Netherlands: 897–899

  • Eisenbeis P, Rostum J, Le Gat Y (1999) Statistical models for assessing the technical state of water networks—Some European experiences. Proceedings of AWWA Annual Conference, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht R, Haarhoff J (1996) Optimization of variable speed centrifugal pump operation with a genetic algorithm, Computer methods and water resources III. In: Abousleiman Y, Brebbia C, Chend A-D, and Ouazar D (eds) Computational mechanics. UK pp. 497–504

  • Francos A, Elorza FJ, Bouraoui F, Bidoglio G, Galbiati L (2003) Sensitivity analysis of distributed environmental simulation models: understanding the model behavior in hydrological studies at the catchment scale. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79(2):205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu G, Kapelan Z, Reed P (2012) Reducing the complexity of multi-objective water distribution system optimization through global sensitivity analysis. J Water Res Plan Manag 138(3):196–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Kuo CH (1987) Genetic algorithms in pipeline optimization. J Comput Civ Eng 1(2):128–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulter IC, Kazemi A (1988) Spatial and temporal groupings of water main pipe breakage in Winnipeg. Can J Civ Eng 15(1):91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haaker MPR, Verheijen PJT (2004) Local and global sensitivity analysis for a reactor design with parameter uncertainty. Chem Eng Res Des 82(A5):591–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iman RL, Conover WJ (1982) A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Commun Stat - Simul Comput 11(3):311–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs P, Karney B (1994) GIS development with application to cast iron water main breakage rate. Proceedings of 2nd international conference on water pipeline systems. BHR Group Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland

  • Jeffery (1985) Predicting urban water distribution maintenance strategies: A case study of New Haven Connecticut, Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil Engineering

  • Kettler AJ, Goulter LC (1985) An analysis of pipe breakage in urban water distribution networks. Can J Civ Eng 12(2):286–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kioutsioukis I, Tarantola S, Saltelli A, Gatelli D (2004) Uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis of road transport emission estimates. Atmos Environ 38(38):6609–6620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner Y, Rajani B (2001) Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: statistical models. Urban Water 3:131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Mohanty S (2001) Sensitivity analysis of a complex, proposed geologic waste disposal system using the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 72(3):275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackle G, Savic DA, Walters GA (1995) Application of genetic algorithms to pump scheduling for water supply. In: Genetic Algorithms in Engineering Systems: Innovations and applications, 400–405, GALESIA’95, IEE Conf. no. 414

  • McMullen ID (1982) Advanced concepts in soil evaluation for exterior pipeline corrosion. Proceedings of the AWWA Annual. Conference, Miami

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazif S, Karamouz M, Tabesh M, Moridi A (2010) Pressure management model for urban water distribution networks. Water Res Manag 24:437–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto J, Varum H, Bentes I, Agarwal J (2010) A Theory of Vulnerability of Water Pipe Network (TVWPN). Water Res Manag 24:4237–4254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røstum J (1997) The concept of business risk used for rehabilitation of water networks. In: Proceedings of the 10th EJSW at Tautra. Deterioration of Built Environment: Buildings, Roads and Water Systems, J. Røstum, L. Dören and W. Schilling (ed) Norwegian University of Science and Technology, IVB-report B2-1997-2, ISBN 82-7598-040-2 67–75

  • Saaty TL (1991) Decision-making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Chan KPS (1999) A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 41(1):39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab M, Savic DA, Walters GA (1996) Multiobjective genetic algorithm for pump scheduling in water supply systems. Rep No 96/02, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

  • Shamir U, Howard CDD (1979) An analytic approach scheduling pipe replacement. J AWWA 71(5):248–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson AR, Dandy GC, Murphy L (1994) Genetic algorithms compared to other techniques for pipe optimization. J Water Res Plan Manag 120(4):423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran T, Malano H, Thompson R (2003) Application of the analytical hierarchy process to prioritize irrigation asset renewal: the case of the La Khe irrigation scheme, Vietnam. Eng Constr Archit Manag 10(6):382–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walaski TM, Pelliccia A (1982) Economic analysis of water main breaks. J AWWA 74(3):140–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Fang S, Shinkareva S, Gertner GZ, Anderson A (2001) Uncertainty propagation and error budgets in spatial prediction of topographical factor for revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 45(1):109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Gertner GZ (2007) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with correlated parameters. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(10):1563–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Sara Nazif, Mohsen Yousefi & Zahra Zahmatkesh

  2. Environmental Engineering Programs, Polytechnic Institute of NYU, Brooklyn, NY, USA

    Mohammad Karamouz

Authors
  1. Sara Nazif
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Karamouz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohsen Yousefi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zahra Zahmatkesh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Karamouz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nazif, S., Karamouz, M., Yousefi, M. et al. Increasing Water Security: An Algorithm to Improve Water Distribution Performance. Water Resour Manage 27, 2903–2921 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0323-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0323-2

Keywords