Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 2217–2229 | Cite as

Assessing the Impacts of Four Land Use Types on the Water Quality of Wetlands in Japan

  • Azam Haidary
  • Bahman Jabbarian Amiri
  • Jan Adamowski
  • Nicola Fohrer
  • Kaneyuki Nakane
Article

Abstract

This study examined how changes in the composition of land use can affect wetland water quality. Twenty-four wetlands located in Hiroshima prefecture in the western part of Japan were selected for this purpose. The water quality parameters that were explored include: pH, electrical conductivity, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, total dissolved solid, temperature and different forms of nitrogen. These important indicators of the water quality in the study area were measured from December 2005 to December 2006. The composition of land uses was determined for the catchments of the wetlands. They were then categorized into three classes, including non-disturbed, moderately-disturbed and highly-disturbed wetlands, based on the extent of urban area (as the most disruptive land use type within the catchment of the wetlands). The relationship between land use types and water quality parameters for the wetlands was statistically examined. The findings indicated that there were significant positive relationships between the proportion (%) of urban areas within catchments of the wetlands and EC (r = 0.67, p < 0.01), TDS (r = 0.69, p < 0.01), TN (r = 0.92, p < 0.01), DON (r = 0.6, p < 0.01), NH4 +(r = 0.47, p < 0.05), NO2 (r = 0.50, p < 0.05), while negative relationships were observed between the proportion (%) of forest area in these wetlands and EC (r = −0.62, p < 0.01), TDS (r = −0.68, p < 0.01), TN (r = −0.68, p < 0.01), DON (r = -0.43, p < 0.05), and NH4 + (r = −0.55, p < 0.01). Analysis of the variance also revealed significant differences within the wetland groups in terms of the annual mean of electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, total nitrogen, nitrite, dissolved inorganic nitrogen and dissolved organic nitrogen in the study area. Moreover, the study also indicated that the forest area plays a significant role in withholding nutrient loads from the wetlands, and hence, it can act as a sink for surface/subsurface nutrient inputs flowing into such water bodies from the watersheds.

Keywords

Wetland Land use Water quality Catchment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author (A.H.) would like to thank the Christian Albrecht Universitaet zu Kiel in Germany for their institutional support. The second author (B.J.A) acknowledges the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for conducting this research.

References

  1. Akratos CS, Tsihrintzis VA, Pechlivanidis I, Sylaios GK, Jerrentrup H (2006) A free-water surface constructed wetland for the treatment of agricultural drainage entering Vassova Lagoon, Kavala, Greece. Fresenius Environ Bull 15(12b):1553–1562Google Scholar
  2. Amiri BJ, Nakane K (2006) Modeling the relationship between land cover and river water quality in the Yamaguchi prefecture of Japan. J Ecol Field Biol 29:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amiri BJ, Nakane K (2009) Modeling the linkage between river water quality and landscape metrics in the Chugoku district of Japan. Water Resour Manag 23:931–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amiri BJ, Sudheer KP, Fohrer N (2012) Linkage between in-stream total phosphorus and land cover in Chugoku district Japan: an ANN approach. J Hydrol Hydromech 60:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. APHA (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewaters, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnold CL, Gibbons CJ (1996) Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. J Am Plann Assoc 62:243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basnyat P, Teeter D, Flynn KM, Lockaby BG (1999) Relationships between landscape characteristics and nonpoint source pollution inputs to coastal estuaries. Environ Manag 23:539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boskidis I, Gikas GD, Pisinaras V, Tsihrintzis VA (2011) Spatial and temporal changes of water quality, and SWAT modeling of Vosvozis River Basin, North Greece. J Environ Sci Health A 45(15):421–1440Google Scholar
  9. Brabec E, Schulte S, Richards PL (2002) Impervious surfaces and water quality: a review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. J Plan Lit 16:409–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks KN, Folliott PF, Gregersen HM, DeBano LF (2003) Hydrology and the management of watersheds, 3rd edn. Wiley-Blackwell. pp 574Google Scholar
  11. Castillo MM, Allan JD, Brunzell S (2000) Nutrient concentrations and discharges in a Midwestern agricultural catchment. J Environ Qual 29(4):1142–1151Google Scholar
  12. Clapcott E, Collier KJ, Death G, Goodwin EO, Harding JS, Kelly D, Leathwick JR, Young RG (2011) Quantifying relationships between land-use gradients and structural and functional indicators of stream ecological integrity. Freshw Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02696.x
  13. Cooke SE, Prepas EE (1998) Stream phosphorus and nitrogen export from agricultural and forested watersheds on the boreal plain. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:2292–2299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crosbie B, Chow-Fraser P (1999) Percentage land use in the watershed determines the water and sediment quality of 22 marshes in the Great Lakes basin. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:1781–1791Google Scholar
  15. Daley, ML, McDowell WH (2002) Relationship between dissolved organic nitrogen and watershed characteristics in a rural temperate basin. American Geophysical Union, Spring Meeting, Washington D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  16. DeBusk WF (1999) Nitrogen cycling in wetlands, institute of food and agricultural sciences. University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  17. Gikas GD, Yiannakopoulou T, Tsihrintzis VA (2006) Water quality trends in a coastal lagoon impacted by non-point source pollution after implementation of protective measures. Hydrobiologia 563(1):385–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grant WA, Pederson AK, Marine SL (1997) Ecology and natural resource management: systems analysis and simulation. John Wiley & Sons. Pp. 400Google Scholar
  19. Gregory MB, Calhoun DL (2007) Physical, chemical, and biological responses of streams to increasing watershed urbanization in the piedmont ecoregion of Georgia and Alabama; Chapter B of effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in six Metropolitan areas of the United States; U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5101-B: Reston, VA, USA, 2007; p.104; available online only at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5101B (accessed on July 2010)
  20. Haidary A, Nakane K (2008) Comparative study of the nitrogen dynamics of three wetlands in Higashi-Hiroshima area, west Japan. Pol J Environ Stud 18:617–626Google Scholar
  21. Helms BS, Schoonover JE, Feminella JW (2009) Assessing influences of hydrology, physicochemistry, and habitat on stream fish assemblages across a changing landscape. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Houlahan JE, Findley CS (2004) Estimating the “critical” distance at which adjacent land-use degrades wetland water and sediment quality. Landsc Ecol 19:677–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones KB, Neale AC, Nash MS, Van Remortel RD, Wickham JD, Riitters KH, O’Neill RV (2001) Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: a multiple watershed study from the United States mid-Atlantic region. Landsc Ecol 16:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jordan TE, Whigham DF, Hofmockel KH, Pittek MA (2003) Wetlands and aquatic processes nutrient. J Environ Qual 32:1534–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaste O, Henriksen A, Hindar A (1997) Retention of atmospherically-deriven nitrogen in subcatchments of the Bierkreim river in Southwestern Norway. Ambio 26:269–303Google Scholar
  26. Lee BA, Kwon J, Kim JG (2005) The relationship of vegetation and environmental factors in wangsuk stream and gwarim reservoir: I. Water environments. Korean J Ecol 28:365–373Google Scholar
  27. Liddle MJ (1975) A selective review of the ecological effects of human trampling on natural ecosystems. Biol Conserv 7:17–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. May CW, Horner R, Karr J, Mar B, Welch E (1997) Effects of urbanization on small streams in the puget sound lowland ecoregion. Watershed Prot Tech 2(4):483–494Google Scholar
  29. Mouri G, Takizawa S, Oki T (2011) Spatial and temporal variation in nutrient parameters in stream water in a rural–urban catchment, Shikoku, Japan: effects of land cover and human impact. J Environ Manage 92:1837–1848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ngoye E, Machiwa J (2004) The influence of land use patterns in the ruvu river catchment on water quality in the river system. Phys Chem Earth 29:1161–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Norton MM, Fisher TR (2000) The effects of forest on stream water quality in two coastal plain watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay. Ecol Eng 14(4):337–361Google Scholar
  32. Papastergiadou ES, Retalis A, Apostolakis A, Georgiadis T (2008) Environmental monitoring of spatio-temporal changes using remote sensing and GIS in a Mediterranean Wetland of Northern Greece. Water Resour Manag 22:579–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Plameri L, Treppel M (2002) A GIS-based score system for siting and sizing of created or restored wetlands: two case studies. Water Resour Manag 16:307–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richards C, Host G (1994) Examining land use influences on stream habitats and macro-invertebrates. Water Resour Bull 30:729–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schueler T (1994) The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Prot Tech 1:100–111Google Scholar
  36. Shimoda M (1993) Effect of urbanization on pond vegetation in the Saijo basin, Hiroshima prefecture, Japan. Hikobia 11:305–312Google Scholar
  37. Tsihrintzis VA, Hamid R (1997) Modeling and management of urban stormwater runoff quality: a review. Water Resour Manag 11(2):137–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsihrintzis VA, Vasarhelyi GM, Lipa J (1995) Multiobjective approaches in freshwater wetland restoration and design. Water Int IWRA 20(2):98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsihrintzis VA, Fuentes HR, Gadipudi R (1996) Modeling prevention alternatives for nonpoint source pollution at a wellfield in Florida. Water Resour Bull AWR 32(2):317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tsihrintzis VA, Fuentes HR, Gadipudi R (1997) GIS-aided modeling of nonpoint source pollution impacts on surface and ground waters. Water Resour Manag 11(3):207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. U.S. EPA (2002) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: land-use characterization for nutrient and sediment risk assessment. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. EPA-822-R-02-025Google Scholar
  42. Ukita M, Nakanishi H (1999) Pollutant load analysis for the environmental management of enclosed sea in Japan. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Management of Enclosed Coastal SeasGoogle Scholar
  43. Water and River Commission (2001) Living wetland: an introduction to wetlands. Water Facts 16:1–20Google Scholar
  44. Ye L, Cai QH, Liu RQ, Cao M (2009) The influence of topography and land use on water quality of Xiangxi River in three Geoges reservoir region. Environ Geol 58:937–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Azam Haidary
    • 1
  • Bahman Jabbarian Amiri
    • 2
  • Jan Adamowski
    • 3
  • Nicola Fohrer
    • 4
  • Kaneyuki Nakane
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Environmental Dynamics and Management, Graduate School of Biosphere ScienceHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural ResourcesUniversity of TehranKaraj, Iran
  3. 3.Department of Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental SciencesMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Ecology Centre, Institute of Nature Protection and Water Resources ManagementChristian Albrecht Universität zu KielKielGermany

Personalised recommendations